- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 3,003
- Reaction Score
- 10,817
The fact that UConn is in the G5 division of total bs as a starter. This is why we need to be in a Px conference ASAP.
Navy, but no Army or Air Force? Seems like a nonstarter. Under this scenario, the battle for the last 2 "Power" spots in this scenario would be UConn vs Navy in the East and USF vs Memphis in the South. It is critical that we keep on our current trajectory in football. Given the changing landscape, I am cautiously optimistic that we will be in a Power Conference within the next 36 months.The fact that UConn is in the G5 division of total bs as a starter. This is why we need to be in a Px conference ASAP.
1) it's the athleticLike who cares what the NYT thinks about CFB? That's like caring what a newspaper in Birmingham thinks about the shows on Broadway.
This is a proposal from a bunch of administrators. This is not the opinion of some joker journalists. It might have some legs. The fact Cincy and UCF are in the upper division while we are not is a huge issue. We have a massive football perception issue that needs to be resolved quickly. We can't afford to lose anymore and need to get into a Px conference ASAP. This will be the reality once the big boys got a sniff that there are more money they can squeeze out of the system.Like who cares what the NYT thinks about CFB? That's like caring what a newspaper in Birmingham thinks about the shows on Broadway.
Take the article url and drop it here: PrintFriendlyIs there an alternative access link to this article?
Zero percent chance this ever happens. Conference realignment is driven by media dollars/big brand matchups, not geography. Why on earth would B1G and SEC schools ever agree to do this? Not gonna happen.
Thank you!Take the article url and drop it here: PrintFriendly
1) it's the athletic
2) the proposal is from a group of CFB executives, not some random journalist
Read the article next time
This is a proposal from a bunch of administrators. This is not the opinion of some joker journalists. It might have some legs. The fact Cincy and UCF are in the upper division while we are not is a huge issue. We have a massive football perception issue that needs to be resolved quickly. We can't afford to lose anymore and need to get into a Px conference ASAP. This will be the reality once the big boys got a sniff that there are more money they can squeeze out of the system.
They’ve lost me at Boston CollegeThis is a proposal from a bunch of administrators. This is not the opinion of some joker journalists. It might have some legs. The fact Cincy and UCF are in the upper division while we are not is a huge issue. We have a massive football perception issue that needs to be resolved quickly. We can't afford to lose anymore and need to get into a Px conference ASAP. This will be the reality once the big boys got a sniff that there are more money they can squeeze out of the system.
Zero percent chance this ever happens. Conference realignment is driven by media dollars/big brand matchups, not geography. Why on earth would B1G and SEC schools ever agree to do this? Not gonna happen.
I don't disagree with the premise of the article, though I do find issue with how UConn was, again, conveniently left out despite meeting criteria 1, 2, and 4 (albeit not per the 100 years, but let's be honest, what happened in the 60's means zilch today, so better to make it a 25 year look back). But seriously, this writer is out of his mind if he thinks FBS will go back to a more regional league setup.
Agree with a lot of your thoughts, but there's no way there'd be this sort of division of all the P's together. The G's yeah maybe. The end game would be the top 30 or so brands/NFL lite standing on their own and then geography/rival-based groupings of everyone else. I don't like it but the big money will drive things. Money goes to money.The deal at major football and basketball programs with the non-revenue sports has always been that football and basketball pay for the whole program, so the rest of the sports put up with things like realignment where field hockey and volleyball teams travel halfway across the country for a game. With the House settlement coming, and potential additional litigation beyond it, football and basketball have become a lot less profitable.
I think a lot of programs are going to be doing some hard assessments of their athletic budgets, and it will impact the non-revenue sports. Most non-revenue sports' coaches that I have seen quoted on this topic wish football would split off, and I think there is a growing number of major universities that may agree with that.
The main reason to keep it all under one roof at this point is if the P2 is making a power play for basketball too. That would be incredibly stupid, likely fail, and result in even more litigation, but I do not put anything past the idiots that run college sports.
I think that TV/Streaming would like football splitting off because that could result in better regional schedules that fans would care more about.
Agree with a lot of your thoughts, but there's no way there'd be this sort of division of all the P's together. The G's yeah maybe. The end game would be the top 30 or so brands/NFL lite standing on their own and then geography/rival-based groupings of everyone else. I don't like it but the big money will drive things. Money goes to money.
This is why I stopped watching any college football other than our Huskies.As if you can dislike someone even more. The best thing for the rest of college football fans to do is stop watching SEC and B1G games. They are a ruthless monopoly acting like a mafia gang. At some point, there has to be some sort of congressional inquiry into this since they are destroying rest of the colleges.