NBA Discussion 2016/2017 | Page 14 | The Boneyard

NBA Discussion 2016/2017

My first thought on that trade is that it's awful for Charlotte. Plumlee isn't exactly on a great contract
 
Yeah, I know much has been made on this board of Kemba's team-friendly contract, but it's pretty hard to believe that the Hornet's back-up center is going to be paid more than their all-star point guard.
 
That AO for IT swap has to be one of the worst trades in the history of sports.

IT is an AS and AO never played a minute in the league

Crazy thing is people will say that 10 years from now. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy.
 
Geez, Kemba has sucked lately. He's a lousy shooter in general and seems to have reverted to that mainly.

Glad he's an AS, but he's been terrible in last 20+ games.
 
.-.
JSM1970 said:
Geez, Kemba has sucked lately. He's a lousy shooter in general and seems to have reverted to that mainly.

Glad he's an AS, but he's been terrible in last 20+ games.
Expand ...

If by 20+ games, you mean 5 games, sure. But if you actually mean 20 games, he is putting up 22 on 43/39 splits. A dip from his torrid start, but still ASG worthy numbers. I don't think I have ever seen another poster lie so much to make UCONN alum seem much worse than they actually are. Nice fake facts.
 
walker11 said:
After becoming a very bad player because of 3 off games, Kemba has become a very good player again after scoring 29 tonight in a losing effort.
Expand ...

Unfortunately there isn't really any denying that he plays for a bad team which seems to be trending down. Would be cool to see Kemba end up on a competitor someday.
 
.-.
Looks like an injured Rudy will be stuck in Sac purgatory, I hope they dont play a role in ending a career early.
 
Guess the Celtics really didn't want Boogie - they could've put together a better package without breaking a sweat.

Also, NO need a SG real bad now, and our old friend Ben Gordon is tearing up the d-league...
 
Matrim55 said:
Guess the Celtics really didn't want Boogie - they could've put together a better package without breaking a sweat.

Also, NO need a SG real bad now, and our old friend Ben Gordon is tearing up the d-league...
Expand ...
Is he tearing it up? Obviously I've seen that he's back in the D League but I never actually looked to see how well he was doing
 
Wonder if there is anything to the Otto Porter/LAC rumors. He's the type of player that could take that team to the next level, but I can't imagine why Washington would want to make him available.

50+ games in, things are starting to get very interesting. The title race still seems like a formality, but there are some story lines that intrigue me as a casual NBA fan.

One, the East is wide open - you look at Detroit in the eight spot and you wonder if they could beat a team like Boston in the first round. When you're #2 seed has a +2.8 point differential (and Cleveland is only +5.4), that means it's a really weak conference. I don't exempt Cleveland from this, either. I think they're more vulnerable than people think, and while I wouldn't pick Toronto to beat them, but you could have a series there. Washington looks dangerous and even Atlanta is intriguing.

I'm fascinated by the Cousins trade. Cousins would have fit much better in Boston, IMO. He can work with Davis just because they're both amazing players, but it isn't optimal. Seems like they're building a team to win the 1974 title. You'd much rather pair Davis with a perimeter guy and play him as a pick and pop killer. Somebody like Paul George would have fit much better, IMO. They'll probably be just good enough to win one game against Golden State in the playoffs, but who knows how these things play out.

San Antonio lurks, as always. I think Patty Mills needs more minutes, but their front court is built - unlike New Orleans - to dictate the tenor of the game on both ends. The Clippers still carry the cache of a contender to me, even if everything points against that - they've rarely been whole over the last two years, and the last time they were, they were a Falcons-like choke job from the conference finals (same sort of thing happened against OKC the previous year). Houston feels gimmicky to me but they'll still be fun to watch, and this Jazz team should be fun to check out when I get around to realizing they exist.
 
Boogie was not a need in Boston, especially with his locker room attitude.
 
.-.
He definitely fills a need, but Ainge didn't feel he was worth the risk. The Celtics desperately need frontcourt help, though.
 
champs99and04 said:
Wonder if there is anything to the Otto Porter/LAC rumors. He's the type of player that could take that team to the next level, but I can't imagine why Washington would want to make him available.

50+ games in, things are starting to get very interesting. The title race still seems like a formality, but there are some story lines that intrigue me as a casual NBA fan.

One, the East is wide open - you look at Detroit in the eight spot and you wonder if they could beat a team like Boston in the first round. When you're #2 seed has a +2.8 point differential (and Cleveland is only +5.4), that means it's a really weak conference. I don't exempt Cleveland from this, either. I think they're more vulnerable than people think, and while I wouldn't pick Toronto to beat them, but you could have a series there. Washington looks dangerous and even Atlanta is intriguing.

I'm fascinated by the Cousins trade. Cousins would have fit much better in Boston, IMO. He can work with Davis just because they're both amazing players, but it isn't optimal. Seems like they're building a team to win the 1974 title. You'd much rather pair Davis with a perimeter guy and play him as a pick and pop killer. Somebody like Paul George would have fit much better, IMO. They'll probably be just good enough to win one game against Golden State in the playoffs, but who knows how these things play out.

San Antonio lurks, as always. I think Patty Mills needs more minutes, but their front court is built - unlike New Orleans - to dictate the tenor of the game on both ends. The Clippers still carry the cache of a contender to me, even if everything points against that - they've rarely been whole over the last two years, and the last time they were, they were a Falcons-like choke job from the conference finals (same sort of thing happened against OKC the previous year). Houston feels gimmicky to me but they'll still be fun to watch, and this Jazz team should be fun to check out when I get around to realizing they exist.
Expand ...

I believe I heard Lowe talking about Porter to the Clippers. He said the GM of the Wizards dropped the phone when asked about Otto. Tough to see the Clippers picking up a 3 who moves the needle unless they unload Blake, an idea I actually like. If they can get 2 of Bradley, Smart, Brown or Crowder, plus the Nets pick, I like the move for both teams. They can't compete with the Clippers with the current construction. Might as well go with a pNr offense with CP3 and Jordan and spread the floor with 3 and D wings. I'm not exactly sure how the Celtics would fit in Blake but Stevens would find a way to maximize his high-level individual abilities. Blake is actually the best playmaker out of himself, George and Butler and would allow IT to remain the go-to scorer.

I am excited for the deadline and hope that chaos ensues but it typically underwhelms. I do have curiosity to see how the Raptors and Pelicans play in the 2nd half but barring an injury Lebron, but like you said, I can't see a way to any series besides Cavaliers/Warriors.
 
This trade tells me Ainge did his usual "throw shhh offers at them and hope they stick" technique. No, it didn't work.
 
walker11 said:
I believe I heard Lowe talking about Porter to the Clippers. He said the GM of the Wizards dropped the phone when asked about Otto. Tough to see the Clippers picking up a 3 who moves the needle unless they unload Blake, an idea I actually like. If they can get 2 of Bradley, Smart, Brown or Crowder, plus the Nets pick, I like the move for both teams. They can't compete with the Clippers with the current construction. Might as well go with a pNr offense with CP3 and Jordan and spread the floor with 3 and D wings. I'm not exactly sure how the Celtics would fit in Blake but Stevens would find a way to maximize his high-level individual abilities. Blake is actually the best playmaker out of himself, George and Butler and would allow IT to remain the go-to scorer.

I am excited for the deadline and hope that chaos ensues but it typically underwhelms. I do have curiosity to see how the Raptors and Pelicans play in the 2nd half but barring an injury Lebron, but like you said, I can't see a way to any series besides Cavaliers/Warriors.
Expand ...
0% chance Ainge offers that package for Griffin.

I'm actually a bigger Griffins fan than most, but doesn't really fit as well with Horford on the roster. And even if he stays healthy, he isn't really good enough to get them past Cleveland.
 
UConn990411 said:
0% chance Ainge offers that package for Griffin.

I'm actually a bigger Griffins fan than most, but doesn't really fit as well with Horford on the roster. And even if he stays healthy, he isn't really good enough to get them past Cleveland.
Expand ...

I think Blake and Horford fit well. That's the benefit of Horford IMO - he can fit well with a variety of different skill sets. He has earned a reputation of having one the best mid-range jumpers among bigs and has stretched his range to the 3 point line. Blake's flaw is obvious - he doesn't have a 3 pointer, but he is a great playmaker and while I don't know the best utilization of the pair, I have confidence that Stevens would find it.

Boston needs to make a move eventually, even if the move doesn't push them past the Cavs. No realistic move is going to elevate any Eastern Conference team to the #1 spot. But you can't just waste for Lebron to decline. Top tier free agents have very little incentive to move when they will sacrifice 30 mil so a trade is the only real option. The Celtics have a lot of assets but they depreciate by the day. And I like the Griffin/Horford fit more than I like the IT/Butler or IT/George fits simply because all those guys thrive in ISO situations. I'm sure there are much smarter NBA guys than myself who wholeheartedly disagree but this is just my opinion.

The pick doesn't need to be the '18 pick. Could Bradley, Brown and the '19 pick get it done? The Clippers would remain in the upper echelon of the West with Deandre and CP3 and a good supporting cast and would very likely have a top 3 pick in '19 since the Nets have the worst roster in the League. This allows them to remain relevant in the near term which is important with an aging CP3, and they would have a crack at drafting a franchise player in '19. The Celtics would have a great core of IT, Jae, Blake, Horford and Smart to go along with likely Fultz or Ball, who both look like future stars.
 
walker11 said:
But you can't just waste for Lebron to decline.
Expand ...
Seriously. You make your team as good as you can without mortgaging your future, and you see what luck falls your way. The Cavs this year are vulnerable with their injuries, and LeBron isn't young. It's quite possible he'll get hurt one year--and then you capitalize.
 
.-.
You guys are overstating the Cavs' vulnerability - they've been on cruise control this season, and they still have a nice cushion for the 1 seed.

Obviously a longer term injury can change things, but is it really worth giving up assets to beat the Cavs, only to get waxed by the Warriors? I'm not so sure.
 
UConn990411 said:
You guys are overstating the Cavs' vulnerability - they've been on cruise control this season, and they still have a nice cushion for the 1 seed.

Obviously a longer term injury can change things, but is it really worth giving up assets to beat the Cavs, only to get waxed by the Warriors? I'm not so sure.
Expand ...

This I agree with. As long as they have LeBron, they are the prohibitive favorite in the East. And LeBron has been injured a total of 0 time in what, 12 years?

But don't you think they should make a trade? What do you want to see? They are in such good shape that they could roll the dice with this roster and load up with 2 top 3 picks the next 2 years. The only likely casualty would be Bradley. And they could have near max space this summer, if they stretch Olynyk, I believe. It just gets back to the free agency quandary. They are so well positioned (thanks Nets and Ainge) that's it difficult to see them falling out of the top 4 in the East in the next 3 to 4 years.
 
walker11 said:
This I agree with. As long as they have LeBron, they are the prohibitive favorite in the East. And LeBron has been injured a total of 0 time in what, 12 years?

But don't you think they should make a trade? What do you want to see? They are in such good shape that they could roll the dice with this roster and load up with 2 top 3 picks the next 2 years. The only likely casualty would be Bradley. And they could have near max space this summer, if they stretch Olynyk, I believe. It just gets back to the free agency quandary. They are so well positioned (thanks Nets and Ainge) that's it difficult to see them falling out of the top 4 in the East in the next 3 to 4 years.
Expand ...
Of course I'd love to see them make a move. If the price for George or Butler (preferably George) comes way down, I'm all for it. Not only does he take them up a notch, but he's only 26 so they wouldn't be mortgaging the future at all. Realistically though, they end up plugging some holes with minor moves (Bogut at center, for instance).

But I don't want to see them fall into the trap of making a trade just because it feels like they're close. The Celts are in position to be be good for 5+ years, and they still have plenty of untapped potential coming their way. Jaylen Brown, the two Euros who are getting rave reviews, the Brooklyn pick, even Rozier and Smart - unless a no-brainer trade comes along, I'm fine with seeing how all these guys pan out.

They might be players for a guy like Hayward in the offseason, but they also need to start locking up some of their own talent soon - namely IT and Bradley, if they choose to keep him. Another reason to hold onto your young players is to have a steady pipeline of talent for cheap, which will allow them to keep the players they want without breaking a sweat.
 
Last edited:


gut feeling is drummond will be moved by the deadline, I haven't been the biggest fan of his on court progression but man is the master of panic really getting screwey here. SVG must be doing everything he can to off RJ and AD ,what if he is unable to?
 
James said:


gut feeling is drummond will be moved by the deadline, I haven't been the biggest fan of his on court progression but man is the master of panic really getting screwey here. SVG must be doing everything he can to off RJ and AD ,what if he is unable to?
Expand ...

Get him to the C's, they'd be right up with the Cavs if they do so.
 
James said:


gut feeling is drummond will be moved by the deadline, I haven't been the biggest fan of his on court progression but man is the master of panic really getting screwey here. SVG must be doing everything he can to off RJ and AD ,what if he is unable to?
Expand ...

I know we love our social media "following" rumors so much.

*Apparently* Andre unfollowed the Pistons on Insta and Twitter. Not sure if this is actually true because I don't have a Twitter and don't necessarily feel like creeping on Instagram, but that could possibly be something to think about

Also, he re-tweeted Isaiah Thomas' eye emoji tweet this morning and then tweeted the same tweet himself. Don't look too much into it obviously, just relaying some info.
 
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,184
Messages
4,556,031
Members
10,441
Latest member
Virginiafan


Top Bottom