- Joined
- Jun 9, 2017
- Messages
- 6,479
- Reaction Score
- 25,800
Tunnel of Love gets ripped on by some but it's damn good.
While I agree the overall album quality drops some, there are still bunch of really fantastic songs post 1980
Tunnel of Love gets ripped on by some but it's damn good.
The Rising and Magic are very solid albumsWhile I agree the overall album quality drops some, there are still bunch of really fantastic songs post 1980
Sarah Vaughan fills out that group.So...I am not interested in going through 9 pages of comments, so forgive me if this has been said. But I don't care who your fourth is.... Sinatra is King of all American music and Springsteen and Whitney aren't far behind. Stick in whoever for fourth, but those 3 are unbeatable. And I am not a New Jersey fan.
Wow. I can see you lifting your shirt dancing to "Tell Her About It."
Fourth would be Paul Simon - thats an impressive group with a broad rangeSo...I am not interested in going through 9 pages of comments, so forgive me if this has been said. But I don't care who your fourth is.... Sinatra is King of all American music and Springsteen and Whitney aren't far behind. Stick in whoever for fourth, but those 3 are unbeatable. And I am not a New Jersey fan.
Should beSteam was never a real band
What about Charles Ives. Tracy Chapman. And carol king?Props for bringing Ap in to the convo. Apathy is hands down the king of CT.
But they were the manHe was really good in Scrubs.
Steely Dan is good - but Bon Jovi is internationally famous and Steely Dan being a band and not a person was a joke on a national television marketing campaign.
Wasn’t Tupac originally from Norwalk or at least stayed there for awhile? I knew his cousin and a friend of ours family fostered him in CT for a spell. Oddly. They had a member who is friends with Moby now.If Connecticut included NY, NJ MA and eastern PA to more or less equal Texas, we’d kill it.
Fourth would be Paul Simon - thats an impressive group with a broad range
There's a difference between being "good" artistically and selling tickets. It's why I don't think that Bon Jovi necessarily belongs on any Rushmore.1. I actually posted in this thread about seeing Nickleback and they stunk.
2. Comparing Nickleback to Billy Joel is absurd.
I love the BY - the nonsensical posturing is amazing.
There's a difference between being "good" artistically and selling tickets. It's why I don't think that Bon Jovi necessarily belongs on any Rushmore.
That said, Billy Joel is much better than Nickelback.
Well...fame necessarily has to be--and should be--a factor. But a Mt. Rushmore ought to be factoring more than fame. It has to factor in innovation and influence. Which means it is also going to be era specific. Ultimately, a Rushmore tells you more about the person building it than it does the people on it.obviously... arianna grande is popular.
but building a mt rushmore has to include fame -
saying a shady glen cheeseburger should be on the mt rushmore and not the big mac is just listing 4 things you like not building a mt rushmore.
Well...fame necessarily has to be--and should be--a factor. But a Mt. Rushmore ought to be factoring more than fame. It has to factor in innovation and influence. Which means it is also going to be era specific. Ultimately, a Rushmore tells you more about the person building it than it does the people on it.
I have no flipping idea who "Southside Johnny" is so I'm in no place to argue his case.there is no case for southside johnny over bon jovi than i like him better.
I have no flipping idea who "Southside Johnny" is so I'm in no place to argue his case.
There are all sorts of bands that are more listened to now than they were when they first came out, and there are bands that influenced others through their cult status enough that they've become themselves famous. There are too many examples to make any single notation worthwhile.
It's the same with movies. Bon Jovi sucks enough and there are enough other bands at that time doing interesting things at the same time that I have little doubt very few people will care about Mr. Bovine Joni in like 50 years.
You can just look at who were the top sellers at the time current popular bands were playing to see that this is the case.
It’s not like Sinatra is at the height of his popularity.
Don’t want to start another thread but who’s on your Boy Band Mount Rushmore
I gotta say, takes like "actually Sinatra is chick feces" are the reason I read the internet.
Thank you @whaler11