Can we just give Harkless his props and move on. He's impressive and getting better game by game.
Can we just give Harkless his props and move on. He's impressive and getting better game by game.
mauconn, lets put it this way. If Daniels were as good as Harkless, he'd be getting 35 minutes at Uconn and it wouldn't be a war for PT in practice. Harkless would be an easy 30+ minute per game player at Uconn right now. Some seem to think that if roles were reversed that Harkless would be Daniels and vice versa. That is not the case. Big east ROY is a two horse race between Drummond and Harkless. To think Harkless wouldn't be getting lion's share of minutes at the SF spot at Uconn is crazy, even though there are some decent players there.
Well with 3 NCs I suppose we really can't challenge Calhoun's methods but this is worrisome for future recruiting. Last years recruiting class could be the best we see for a long time as kids see this stuff (i.e. Harkless getting PT and Daniels fighting to stay relevant). I am hoping that Daniels is growing mentally as a player from the spotty PT and hard practices as I was thrilled when we got him and I really want to see him thrive in our program (not just bc he was the alternative to Moe).
It was bad advice to go to a team where he's the go-to guy and he's averaging 16 and 8 with about 1.5 steals, blocks, and assists? And he poured in 30 and 13 against Duke?Oh well, he would have fit well with UConn. Someone gave him bad advice.
This is a good description. Kid seems to have a locked-in angle at his hips, and he doesn't seem to swivel much at the waist, either on D or on O.Daniels appears to be really tight in the hips . . .
mauconn, lets put it this way. If Daniels were as good as Harkless, he'd be getting 35 minutes at Uconn and it wouldn't be a war for PT in practice. Harkless would be an easy 30+ minute per game player at Uconn right now. Some seem to think that if roles were reversed that Harkless would be Daniels and vice versa. That is not the case. Big east ROY is a two horse race between Drummond and Harkless. To think Harkless wouldn't be getting lion's share of minutes at the SF spot at Uconn is crazy, even though there are some decent players there.
This is a good description. Kid seems to have a locked-in angle at his hips, and he doesn't seem to swivel much at the waist, either on D or on O.
Not sure what it is, but there it is.
The problem with all the Harkless vs Daniels comparisons is that they ignore the timeline of events. Daniels essentially took Jamal Coombs-McDaniel's scholarship after Harkless was long gone. If you believe Nate Blue, Harkless soured on UConn when Roscoe Smith was signed. Whatever you want to say about Roscoe and his struggles to find a role now, he contributed to a national championship. Had Harkless somehow known that Jamal Coombs-McDaniel was going to transfer, maybe he would have been less worried about Roscoe. But for Daniels to be the one getting the wrath of the "I wish we had Harkless" crowd ignores that, what, 15 months elapsed between one backing out and the other committing?
I love Scoe on the team. He is solid and is a good defender, rebounder, and glue guy. The whole issue is Harkless over Daniels.
It was bad advice to go to a team where he's the go-to guy and he's averaging 16 and 8 with about 1.5 steals, blocks, and assists? And he poured in 30 and 13 against Duke?
RayRay at UConn only averaged 13 and 5 his freshman year.
Why is it that some fans think that any recruit who doesn't choose UConn made a mistake?
It's like they're 9th grade girls bitter about their putative beau taking a rival female to the dance.
So you think we're going to the final four this year?He'd be featured in the Final 4 instead of the CBIA or whatever the heck that is.
So you think we're going to the final four this year?
Nah. He wouldn't get 1/2 the playing time at UConn.With Moe Harkless, yes.
Nah. He wouldn't get 1/2 the playing time at UConn.
Improved AAU player? C'mon. Harkless is a lottery pick if he leaves after his sophomore year and is on the cusp this year. He was easily the best player on the court against Duke yesterday and it wasn't even close. Duke had nobody near as good. Daniels isn't even close at the point, just because he's the same height. Some of these comparisons are nuts.
...and the same can easily be said about DD if he had the minutes Harkless has. You really think everybody will equate him to a lottery pick with JC minutes?
It's an issue because the magic-man thinks he's an NBA Guru.....
No one is arguing they are different players but two points are being made here. One, Harkless wouldn't get the same minutes and given the surrounding cast of players, he would not get the same production as he has at St Johns. Second, there is no guarantee what DD would produce given th same minutes Harkless does but given the cast he would have at St Johns, his production has to be better than hs current output. My guess is it would be enough to generate enough buzz. Think Cleaveland Melvin. Maybe not at the lottery level, but Harkless isn't at that point eitherNo, you can't say that about Daniels. If you give Daniels 60 minutes of play there's no guarantee he can do what Harkless has. I'd venture to guess he wouldn't match numbers with 35 per game instead of 15. It's a preposterous assumption. They are different players irrespective of their height or minutes played.
Nah. He wouldn't get 1/2 the playing time at UConn.