Maryland post game thread | Page 14 | The Boneyard

Maryland post game thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's hope this is a bump in the road.

But it feels like we have hit a wall.
I liked what I saw from Fagnano, and I was one of his biggest critics last year. Seems like a different and much improved QB. I don’t know who worked with him in the off season but someone on the coaching staff was doing something right. So assuming of course Mora saw the same progress for Fagnano, you have to wonder about Evers prospects for improvement going forward.
 
Last edited:
it’s starts in the locker room. The players know.. can see through the BS.. Need to fix that 1st before anything else. We got the players.. just play the best players..let the REAL players make plays.. the pieces of the puzzle are there..
I agree. I think we have enough to win. We gotta grow a pair in order to turn the corner. I know we're supposed keep our composure as competitors out there, but did anyone else pick up on WR Jasaiah Gathings' facial expression on the bench near the end of the game??? I didn't look at that as being a sore loser. To me it seemed like a competitor that doesn't like or hates losing. WE NEED MORE OF THAT IN ORDER TO TURN THE CORNER. NO MORE ACCEPTING MEDIOCRITY (DURING PRACTICE)...Gotta develop a killer instinct. Enough is enough.
 
Let's hope this is a bump in the road.

But it feels like we have hit a wall.
My positive takeaway is that at least I’m not on the Conf Realignment board! Talking about something real here!
 
On to next week…some quick thoughts on what I saw in the MC/Air Force game.

Air Force makes our passing game look competent. Their running game was not great either. (55 attempts for 166 yds, a 3.0 per carry average) I’m not particularly worried about next week. We probably won’t win 56-7, but I can see us putting up some points and keeping MC off the scoreboard for the most part. The other thing I noticed was that of the 2 QBs who played for MC, neither one was a very accurate passer and they really had no downfield game. I will say I thought MC hit hard and tackled well. Just my 2 cents. Prediction…I’d say 35-10 UConn With the MC TD coming late in the game.
View attachment 103263
Good Analysis. From what I saw, Merrimack had size and definitely looked good against the run. I'm not sure this is the blow out that people are hoping for. For me, I am just hoping for a win. A convincing win would be better but a complete blow out is not likely to happen considering where our offense is at this time. I do hope our defense is dominating.
 
I’ve read before that what we are doing is more if 4-2-5 shape.

But the system wasn’t the problem yesterday.
I noticed on a couple of the scramble/ completions that Maryland got that our DBs and LBs looked like they didn’t get enough depth to keep the coverage. On one play in particular, they had a line directly across the field, but the completion went into the dead area they had forgotten about. I think it’s about them looking into the backfield too much and forgetting about the receivers, if that makes any sense.
 
.-.
There's still probably more kids playing Football in the Dakotas than CT lol, and the Midwest has a large Football culture

They don't play Football up here, and NE is almost always last in recruiting talent
Here's a question for you. Who has more college football programs the states of Texas + Florida, or the states of New York + CT + Massachusetts?

Texas + Florida = 62
New York + CT + Massachusetts = 71

In other words there are more kids playing college football in NY+ CT+ MA than in Texas + Florida.

Yes, there is more HS talent in Texas and Florida, but many of the Northeast kids are underdeveloped in high school. Edsall showed us that when he recruited 2*s and no *s and made them into talented FBS football players. Look at a guy like Kendall Reyes. From New Hampshire and totally under the radar recruit. He was a 6'4" 220 LB in HS and became a 6'4" 300 lb DT at UConn. Those types of guys are not recruited by the top schools as they don't recruit undersized players.
 
Here's a question for you. Who has more college football programs the states of Texas + Florida, or the states of New York + CT + Massachusetts?

Texas + Florida = 62
New York + CT + Massachusetts = 71

In other words there are more kids playing college football in NY+ CT+ MA than in Texas + Florida.

Yes, there is more HS talent in Texas and Florida, but many of the Northeast kids are underdeveloped in high school. Edsall showed us that when he recruited 2*s and no *s and made them into talented FBS football players. Look at a guy like Kendall Reyes. From New Hampshire and totally under the radar recruit. He was a 6'4" 220 LB in HS and became a 6'4" 300 lb DT at UConn. Those types of guys are not recruited by the top schools as they don't recruit undersized players.
If we have so many programs why are we near the bottom in top recruits produced? What do you think our problem is?

We should naturally be higher then given the sheer population alone
 
This is what I want to hear about. Couldn’t see game. I was horrified hearing we were going back to 3-3-5. How did it look? Any potential? Any fingerprints from the new DC showing he is going to put some psychos out there? Were we confused in our roles on D, but once we get the hang of it, maybe it works. Would like some analysis, other than how crappy we feel.

A lot of good fb minds here.
We didn't generate a big pass rush and got picked apart in the zone because of it. It looked like we had multiple guys covering one guy in a specific zone and it left people open. I just don't think the spacing was very good and guys were probably a bit unclear of where exactly they needed to be. It's game 1 year 1 stuff with a new scheme.
 
The system wasn't the problem. Seemed like lots of 4-2-5. We were rushing 4 generally.
We were getting gashed on the run. On the pass, we lost outside contain and had no rush, and our multitude of DBs were cushion crazy. 3-3 is a hollowed-out speed defense that doesn’t work unless you have super athletes.
 
.-.
The Dakotas are surrounded by Minnesota, Iowa, Nebraska, Wyoming, and Montana. Connecticut has more HS football talent than any of those states.
Are you sure about that? Minnesota’s population is almost twice that of Connecticut’s.
 
If you want to base your opinion on one away game against a very good Maryland team then I have to say you sound more like a trouble maker than a true UConn football fan.
But it was not one game. It goes back to last year at a minimum in the Mora era. If you think yesterday's game was an indication of how this team will be this year, it will be a big disappointment. Both offense and defense were dismal. Maryland may be good, but it should never have gotten away like it did. I did not expect a win, but a respectable showing. It was not. This program should be in the upper eschelons of the G5 by now, and they are nowhere near it.
 
Pennsylvania St is not in New England and is more Ohio than Pennsylvania
I was just going off of your list that included Pitt, Rutgers, Syracuse, and Maryland. All of which are also not in New England, but Penn State falls approximately in the middle of all of them.
 
.-.
I've never been a fan of the 3-3-5 (going back long before we attempted it with Crocker seven yers ago) but to some extent I understand why, with the direction this sport is taking having some variant of that defense is necessary.

The biggest problem with the 3-3 front is that if the opponent can sucessfully block each of the three defensive linemen one on one, you're cooked. That's what happened for the most part yesterday, hopefully we won't see anyone else who can do the same.

We did switch off quite a bit to 4-2 up front (which we were told would happen a lot this season0,) which makes it a bit easier for the front line to battle the offensive line, but this is at the cost of flexibility in attacking from the LB's and, if the offensive line can hanbdle the front four, you're left trying to matchup with a safety at linebacker.

I'm not ready to give up on the season nor am I ready to give up on Brock as a defensive coordinator but I was hoping that we would be a bit more cohesive at this point than we were. There was thing they showed on TV yesterday, that each of the past five recruiting classes for Maryland were all top 40, two being top twenty, so yes, there was quite a bit of talent on the other side.

Time will tell on the remainder of the season.
 
I've never been a fan of the 3-3-5 (going back long before we attempted it with Crocker seven yers ago) but to some extent I understand why, with the direction this sport is taking having some variant of that defense is necessary.

The biggest problem with the 3-3 front is that if the opponent can sucessfully block each of the three defensive linemen one on one, you're cooked. That's what happened for the most part yesterday, hopefully we won't see anyone else who can do the same.

We did switch off quite a bit to 4-2 up front (which we were told would happen a lot this season0,) which makes it a bit easier for the front line to battle the offensive line, but this is at the cost of flexibility in attacking from the LB's and, if the offensive line can hanbdle the front four, you're left trying to matchup with a safety at linebacker.

I'm not ready to give up on the season nor am I ready to give up on Brock as a defensive coordinator but I was hoping that we would be a bit more cohesive at this point than we were. There was thing they showed on TV yesterday, that each of the past five recruiting classes for Maryland were all top 40, two being top twenty, so yes, there was quite a bit of talent on the other side.

Time will tell on the remainder of the season.
The issue I see the team did not looked well coached. The secondary for 2nd year in a row can not cover or tackle. Too many cheap shots on sliding QBs. UConn has little room for error.
 
If we have so many programs why are we near the bottom in top recruits produced? What do you think our problem is?

We should naturally be higher then given the sheer population alone
In the Northeast, football recruits aren't as developed as in places like Texas and Georgia. For UConn, there are tons of football players within 300 miles of UConn. Unfortunately, UConn does not have the football tradition to get the top recruits and you can only change that by winning. Kind of like how Calhoun had to go outside of the footprint to recruit players to change the narrative about UConn basketball.
 
In the Northeast, football recruits aren't as developed as in places like Texas and Georgia. For UConn, there are tons of football players within 300 miles of UConn. Unfortunately, UConn does not have the football tradition to get the top recruits and you can only change that by winning. Kind of like how Calhoun had to go outside of the footprint to recruit players to change the narrative about UConn basketball.
The issue is even before Calhoun, UConn still had a history in basketball. For football UConn does not have that history. In fact outside the ivory league there is really no tradition in college football in New England. If you are a star recruit you are going SEC or BIG. It would be like CT star basketball kid selecting UNH over UConn.
 
.-.
But it was not one game. It goes back to last year at a minimum in the Mora era. If you think yesterday's game was an indication of how this team will be this year, it will be a big disappointment. Both offense and defense were dismal. Maryland may be good, but it should never have gotten away like it did. I did not expect a win, but a respectable showing. It was not. This program should be in the upper eschelons of the G5 by now, and they are nowhere near it.
Um….ok:rolleyes:
 
I've never been a fan of the 3-3-5 (going back long before we attempted it with Crocker seven yers ago) but to some extent I understand why, with the direction this sport is taking having some variant of that defense is necessary.

The biggest problem with the 3-3 front is that if the opponent can sucessfully block each of the three defensive linemen one on one, you're cooked. That's what happened for the most part yesterday, hopefully we won't see anyone else who can do the same.

We did switch off quite a bit to 4-2 up front (which we were told would happen a lot this season0,) which makes it a bit easier for the front line to battle the offensive line, but this is at the cost of flexibility in attacking from the LB's and, if the offensive line can hanbdle the front four, you're left trying to matchup with a safety at linebacker.

I'm not ready to give up on the season nor am I ready to give up on Brock as a defensive coordinator but I was hoping that we would be a bit more cohesive at this point than we were. There was thing they showed on TV yesterday, that each of the past five recruiting classes for Maryland were all top 40, two being top twenty, so yes, there was quite a bit of talent on the other side.

Time will tell on the remainder of the season.
Being down 4 projected starters on D (Yates, Dixon-Williams, Engram & Akles) in addition to a dinged up LB who was a game day decision (McDonald) to start the game sure didn’t help the cause. Depth will always be an issue.

This week will hopefully provide more answers (or concerns)…
 
Being down 4 projected starters on D (Yates, Dixon-Williams, Engram & Akles) in addition to a dinged up LB who was a game day decision (McDonald) to start the game sure didn’t help the cause.

This week will hopefully provide more answers (or concerns)…
... and losing 2 more due to targeting calls during the game. It really isn't mentioned enough that our D out there was short-handed...
 
... and losing 2 more due to targeting calls during the game. It really isn't mentioned enough that our D out there was short-handed...
Thx - I actually forgot to include Durante Jones who was out to for the first half… so that made 5 MIA w/ McDonald not @ full strength.
 
Being down 4 projected starters on D (Yates, Dixon-Williams, Engram & Akles) in addition to a dinged up LB who was a game day decision (McDonald) to start the game sure didn’t help the cause. Depth will always be an issue.

This week will hopefully provide more answers (or concerns)

... and losing 2 more due to targeting calls during the game. It really isn't mentioned enough that our D out there was short-handed...
Maryland was treating the game as a scrimmage allowing their QB2 to get time during the first half. Maryland could have easy scored 70 points.
 
Still annoyed at performance. Maryland definition of a mid level power program. Just couldn’t compete.

win this week. Has to show some explosiveness and athleticism in this game too.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,160
Messages
4,555,218
Members
10,438
Latest member
UConnheart


Top Bottom