Two years ago we got absolutely rolled by a few mid to lower tier ACC teams and ended up having a pretty good season. Last year we started off by hanging in there with a pretty good 9 win ACC team, that would have been better if their QB didn't get hurt mid season, and we had a horrible season. Maryland is probably going to be a good mid tier Big Ten team that is better than any of those.
Regardless, if recent history suggests anything, it is that judging how our season goes based on any particular early game against a P4/P5 opponent, may not be the best idea.
While it was a crap show, in prior years it seemed like both the technique/execution and physical talent were miles off. Even when we had the good season 2 years ago, the physical talent on the team seemed to be overcome by great game day execution. This was even the case last year when it looked like even if our players had executed perfectly, every team appeared to have more physical talent than us.
Yesterday we played a team that should have been way above us in the physical talent area and they were definitely above us in that area, but not as much as I would have expected. Our execution definitely stunk a lot of the game, but at very few points did it seem like if we executed, Maryland's physical talent would have been too much. It felt like we were surprisingly close in that area compared to where we should be.
Technique and execution are things the team can improve and physical talent is something they cannot. From my view, even though the game yesterday was not good in any way, I saw a team that has the potential to be a good team if they can execute. That is something that we have not had in years. Regardless of if it works out in the end or not, I think there is a glimmer of hope that if the team gets it together execution/technique wise, they could be a pretty decent, comfortably bowl bound team.