This is a really great and interesting point. Tennessee coaches can say "come to Tenn - play with Russell for 3 years and Graves for 2 years. Help put us near the top to challenge for a NC". But playing with those kids is great if you want to be friends with them. It's alarming to hear Holly say she's not taught the team offense (or defense - not sure which it was). But getting back to playing with "player X or Y"... I really hope Wilson and her family take a long and hard look at the team chemistry and how the coaches run practices.
Her parents really want A'ja to take a steady and objective look at all 4 teams and make the best decision irrespective of any emotions involved. A'ja's mom is making a list of pros and cons of each program. One of the most important has to be how the coaches develop and coach the players. And watching a UCONN practice vs. watching a Tennessee practice (or SC or UNC for that matter) has to be like night and day for recruits to witness first hand.
I was talking to Milford about that tonight - UCONN runs a true motion offense. More often than not, when they grab a rebound, there are only 1-2 dribbles, and then the ball is continuously passed up and around the court in running offense. How many other teams set up offense with a guard dribbling at random around the perimeter, without any discernible purpose, trying to find a crack in the zone, or pull the man to man defense out of position, but WITHOUT utilizing passing, which makes defenses react much more quickly? It happens an awful lot, even when you watch other "top" teams.
Compare how UCONN runs offense and plays defense and compare that to the other 3 teams, and if that's at, or near, the top of her list in importance, then the choice should be relatively simple...