He’s quick, if not fast. Clark Kellogg might say that he has spurtabilityI hear this guy Come you mentioned is a good rebounder- sticky hands
Just to be clear, not a decision
I’m all in favor of the kids wanting to enjoy their recruiting and having edits of their final schools. But honest question, what’s the point of “cutting down” to a final 11 schools as a transfer? Seems like a bit much.
I think the feeling is that Sid May stay now with the uncertainty of the transfer rule.....so maybe we only add one playerCole is starting next year 100%. Lineups of him and Gaffney starting together have been discussed too, not out of the question. All depends who we get in this next month or two.
You think Nolley's coming here to play a stretch 4? I thought the reason he wanted out of Tech was to paly the 3? Roscoe Smith ring a bell?
Not as annoying as "The Field of 68"There’s something mildly infuriating about announcing a top 11 rather than a top 10.
in 2014 our top 5 players in terms of mpg were kemba, bazz, lamb, roscoe and oriakhi so roscoe primarily played stretch 4
yeah 2011. who cares about olander starting he averaged 9.6 mpg. the point is roscoe played most of his minutes at the 4 and as part of our best lineup....what point are you trying to make?1. You mean in 2011.
2. In 2011, Roscoe started at the 3 each half and was then switched over to a stretch 4 when we went smaller, so he was playing both.
3. In 2012 he barely played. He wanted to play the 3 and the coaches wanted him to play the 4. Thus, Tyler Olander became the third big.
4. And then in 2013 he left because Calhoun saw him as a 4 and he saw himself as a 3.
Also what people conveniently leave out in the Roscoe Smith narrative is he went to UNLV... and played the 4. Which is what we should be doing with Nolley, he'll play the 4 which in our system is a wing and meets his criteriayeah 2011. who cares about olander starting he averaged 9 mpg. the point is roscoe played most of his minutes at the 4 and as part of our best lineup.... what point are you trying to make?
There’s something mildly infuriating about announcing a top 11 rather than a top 10.
Money.Great Shot too
yeah he should have posted a top 10 plus 1 insteadThere’s something mildly infuriating about announcing a top 11 rather than a top 10.
He’s just what we need for National Championship #4 2yeah he should have posted a top 10 plus 1 instead
1. You mean in 2011.
2. In 2011, Roscoe started at the 3 each half and was then switched over to a stretch 4 when we went smaller, so he was playing both.
3. In 2012 he barely played. He wanted to play the 3 and the coaches wanted him to play the 4. Thus, Tyler Olander became the third big.
4. And then in 2013 he left because Calhoun saw him as a 4 and he saw himself as a 3.
It's really fun trying to watch people try and convince themselves UConn is going to play 1980s basketball in 2020
The 4 on the the national championship winning UNC team you mention was Justin Jackson, who is 6'8 193. But sure let's hear more about how Nolley can't work as a 4I get what you’re saying. But there’s also something to be said for zigging while others zag.
Unc went to back to back title games with a double big said.
not saying this is the front court team to go that far, but it’s not impossible to do.
I hope you're right, but Dan started Whaley and Carlton instead of Adams or Gilbert after Akok went down. That makes me uneasy.It's really fun trying to watch people try and convince themselves UConn is going to play 1980s basketball in 2020