- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 22,495
- Reaction Score
- 55,495
For much of the year, most rating services don't publish their rankings publicly, so trying to track players is a tricky, difficult enterprise. And there's the formula itself which also is of course completely ad hoc. I've had several nice discussions with folks who have messaged me about why, and have also been given some food for thought. I chuckle at those who decide after 2 minutes that I have no idea what I'm doing.
As I said earlier in this very thread, the Nurse case is particularly tricky, and I've been unsure how to handle. 2 months ago, I had no info on her. And it wasn't until today I realized Pn had given her a rating. I thought About calculating her score differently, but kept deferring whether or how to do that. It's just one player; so I punted.
The JUCO comment is particularly rich. I've barely seen any JUCO ratings before this month, and I'm sorry, your royal highness, that I don't want to put in the effort to enter all of their info, track their ratings, and then figure out how to integrate them with the HS ratings. (How do you score the the #10 JUCO - same as the #10 HS? #50? #110?)
As I said earlier in this very thread, the Nurse case is particularly tricky, and I've been unsure how to handle. 2 months ago, I had no info on her. And it wasn't until today I realized Pn had given her a rating. I thought About calculating her score differently, but kept deferring whether or how to do that. It's just one player; so I punted.
The JUCO comment is particularly rich. I've barely seen any JUCO ratings before this month, and I'm sorry, your royal highness, that I don't want to put in the effort to enter all of their info, track their ratings, and then figure out how to integrate them with the HS ratings. (How do you score the the #10 JUCO - same as the #10 HS? #50? #110?)