Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 875 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

It seems odd that they had no trouble adding Cal and Stanford when the PAC 12 dissolved as well as SMU,. but didn't give UConn a thought at that time. Maybe UConn would have accepted a reduced revenue share. In the scenario you describe, it seems to me that once the ACC implodes and they possibly invite UConn as one of the backfills, it will now longer be a "power" conference, but more like the current PAC 12 which will by and large resemble the AAC. They may actually take Tulane, Memphis and USF and ignore UConn again. I think UConn and the goverment of Ct should be more aggressive at this time in promoting UConn to the Big 12 or ACC and force ESPN to endorse and enable such a move through further incentives. The State of Ct I believes has a large surplus at this time. I hope we are back to the days of "monitoring", because that is what it seems like. I do believe AD Dave has been doing the very best he could with what support he has.
The ACC added Cal, Stanford, and SMU due to their willingness to take a reduced revenue share and the schools increased the number of ACC Network full price cable subscribers, much more than UConn could have, which also boosted revenues. All that said, the ACC is now a conglomeration of schools instead of a conference of similar schools and inherently unstable.
 

The NCAA has always used the men's tourney revenue as a slush fund to prop up every other NCAA sanctioned sport for men and women other than football.

So, yes, the top dogs in college basketball get nowhere near the revenue share for what they generate.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
168,392
Messages
4,570,301
Members
10,476
Latest member
dd356


Top Bottom