SMU better keep winning football games!Imagine you are an ACC school that is getting a $7 million payment reduction and has to find $20 million for revenue sharing.
It looks like Football will "hold the most value" while basketball will have a smaller percentage. Another aspect of the deal is it will be easier to leave the conference by 2029-2030 school year. They reworked the contract so it will cost less than $100 to leave the ACC by the time the Big10 and Big12 contracts are up for renewal.This seems ill advised. Will be interested in whether basketball ratings count in the metrics. They certainly should. That would produce some interesting results with FSU perhaps not faring as well as it thinks. UNC will BB at the helm might top the list overall. Hiring him makes even more sense now.
Feels like this is a disaster waiting to happen for the ACC.
Belichick helps but several other things are potentially coming online that will allow UNC to compete at a high level regardless of conference membershipThis seems ill advised. Will be interested in whether basketball ratings count in the metrics. They certainly should. That would produce some interesting results with FSU perhaps not faring as well as it thinks. UNC will BB at the helm might top the list overall. Hiring him makes even more sense now.
Feels like this is a disaster waiting to happen for the ACC.
Imagine you are an ACC school that is getting a $7 million payment reduction and has to find $20 million for revenue sharing.
But the Big 12 doesn’t pay better than the ACC, if I’m not mistaken. Kind of feels like it’s a P2 or nothing for those programs you named. The only way I see the Big 12 as attractive for those programs is if the ACC goes bye-bye like the PAC and you have new money available.The best case scenario for UConn was that the exit fee structure remain in place.
Now, the Big 12 can at least imagine a scenario where they can grab Clemson or FSU or Miami or whoever.
As always, the worst case scenario for us is always the scenario that plays out.
Depends on how much the Big12 can get in their next media deal. It seems that FSU is he’ll bent on getting out of the ACC and, if FSU/Clemson can’t get into the Big10, how much more would the Big12 contract get if they were in the league.But the Big 12 doesn’t pay better than the ACC, if I’m not mistaken. Kind of feels like it’s a P2 or nothing for those programs you named. The only way I see the Big 12 as attractive for those programs is if the ACC goes bye-bye like the PAC and you have new money available.
The best case scenario for UConn was that the exit fee structure remain in place.
Now, the Big 12 can at least imagine a scenario where they can grab Clemson or FSU or Miami or whoever.
As always, the worst case scenario for us is always the scenario that plays out.
Huh? Clemson and FSU got almost nothing out of this lawsuit. They wanted a guaranteed disproportionate revenue advantage over the rest of the ACC. They got a performance split. They wanted to walk immediately, they got a declining exit fee starting in 2030 that is still massive and exposes them to UNC and UVa beating them to the door.
Probably not as much as they would get if they wait until the ACC is able to get full market rate deal. So for them & their fan base it's likely SEC or bust. Also they won't take deals like Oregon/UW did just to get inDepends on how much the Big12 can get in their next media deal. It seems that FSU is he’ll bent on getting out of the ACC and, if FSU/Clemson can’t get into the Big10, how much more would the Big12 contract get if they were in the league.
It’s definitely a large part of the equation. Cutting any of the 9.9 equivalency programs on the men’s side allows schools with football programs a way to balance the books without adding more scholarships to the female side. It’s crappy but it’s reality.That’s an interesting point. But lots of schools are cutting wrestling.
I wonder if that’s Title IX and not money related.
I’m not sure I agree with FSU and Clemson getting almost nothing. This was a negotiation where both sides needed to look like they got something. The ACC bought itself a few years of relative quiet, and FSU/Clemson got a workable number that makes leaving the ACC entirely possible. If performance based payments are based on ratings, then they made out there as well. FSU and Clemson will almost always be cashing the biggest checks without making it look like The Boston Colleges and Wakes are being completely extorted.Huh? Clemson and FSU got almost nothing out of this lawsuit. They wanted a guaranteed disproportionate revenue advantage over the rest of the ACC. They got a performance split. They wanted to walk immediately, they got a declining exit fee starting in 2030 that is still massive and exposes them to UNC and UVa beating them to the door.
The Big 12 has a long wait ahead of them for FSU and Clemson. I don’t know that “nothing changes for the ACC” really hurts UConn relative to where we were before.