Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 767 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

.-.
Exit 4 said:
Expand ...

So half a Gonzaga and half a UConn doesn't count? That sucks. I figure if Gonzaga is in, then we're in too if we want it. And I don't see why we wouldn't unless the exit fee would be enormous.

Anyone who wouldn't want this is nuts because it's the best case scenario that's potentially available. Even if we don't get paid a ton.
 
JMick said:
So half a Gonzaga and half a UConn doesn't count? That sucks. I figure if Gonzaga is in, then we're in too if we want it. And I don't see why we wouldn't unless the exit fee would be enormous.
Expand ...
FWIW - I really don't want this P12 football only idea ....I seem to be in the minority.

I will enjoy the meme's though
 
JMick said:
So half a Gonzaga and half a UConn doesn't count? That sucks. I figure if Gonzaga is in, then we're in too if we want it. And I don't see why we wouldn't unless the exit fee would be enormous.
Expand ...
The NCAA rule is written so that only full members count. There's been a lot of talk that the PAC wanted to get to 9 football teams for 8 conference games, so all hope is not lost even if we can't count for the 8th. I think UNLV + Gonzaga/UConn is very much in play here now.
 
JMick said:
So half a Gonzaga and half a UConn doesn't count? That sucks. I figure if Gonzaga is in, then we're in too if we want it. And I don't see why we wouldn't unless the exit fee would be enormous.

Anyone who wouldn't want this is nuts because it's the best case scenario that's potentially available. Even if we don't get paid a ton.
Expand ...
Gonzaga full and UConn half might, unsure
 
Exit 4 said:
FWIW - I really don't want this P12 football only idea ....I seem to be in the minority.

I will enjoy the meme's though
Expand ...
There's really no downside to it if it were to happen.

We would keep the current Big East money, and we would add a pro-rated Pac12 paycheck. Furthermore, it would solve 8 of our 12 games for scheduling purposes (or 7 of 12 depending on which tweet you believe).

Any move to the Pac12 would likely only last until the next realignment. But it's a good football home while the musical chairs plays out...
 
.-.
The Dan Wolken comment seems the most relevant to me. Commissioners, consultants and administrators continue to steal money from the schools. Too much money is going to activities which add very little value to the schools. How much longer before the whole concept of a governing body (NCAA) and conferences is gone?

Athletic departments will spin off as affiliates of the universities and become profit centers. They will negotiate their own media contracts and schedule with guidance from the media outlets. This includes the negotiation of bowls and tournaments. Athletes will be paid directly by the athletic departments. The only question is will the athletes have academic requirements? Welcome to today’s world of “college” athletics!
 
UConnDan97 said:
There's really no downside to it if it were to happen.

We would keep the current Big East money, and we would add a pro-rated Pac12 paycheck. Furthermore, it would solve 8 of our 12 games for scheduling purposes (or 7 of 12 depending on which tweet you believe).

Any move to the Pac12 would likely only last until the next realignment. But it's a good football home while the musical chairs plays out...
Expand ...
Yep as long as there's a minimal exit fee. We also would get CFB playoff money and technically have a shot at the playoff however unlikely it is that ever becomes a problem
 
.-.
JMick said:
Can you give a reason why? It's money and some decent teams to play. Travel will be minimal.
Expand ...

1) Might mean our discussions with the B12 and ACC have really come to an impasse. Of course, I suppose we could sign up for P12 Football only with no GOR/no exit fee for any B12/ACC move...if they would allow it. I want to see what happens this Feb with the ACC/ESPN extension first.

2) Our current independent schedule allows us to build a schedule that has winnable G5 games and also 4 to 5 Power Conf measurement games a year. This year MIGHT play out they way we always intended, winnable schedule to get the recruiting/fanbase mojo restarted, yet also a few reach games. For right now we need to schedule to win.

3) Recruiting... This could work or could be a big fail....seems really high risk though.

Pro:
Great memes
Small boost in our tv $
Slightly improved CFP odds/$
 
UConnDan97 said:
There's really no downside to it if it were to happen.

We would keep the current Big East money, and we would add a pro-rated Pac12 paycheck. Furthermore, it would solve 8 of our 12 games for scheduling purposes (or 7 of 12 depending on which tweet you believe).

Any move to the Pac12 would likely only last until the next realignment. But it's a good football home while the musical chairs plays out...
Expand ...
But we don't have a scheduling problem. Our schedule is beautiful....designed to win.

fbschedules.com

UConn Football Schedule | Future Schedules

View the UConn football schedule for the 2026 season, plus future schedules and opponents at FBSchedules.com.
fbschedules.com
 
Exit 4 said:
But we don't have a scheduling problem. Our schedule is beautiful....designed to win.

fbschedules.com

UConn Football Schedule | Future Schedules

View the UConn football schedule for the 2026 season, plus future schedules and opponents at FBSchedules.com.
fbschedules.com
Expand ...
I don't mind being designed to win, because it helps change the national perception of us. But I also know that playing Oregon State in The Rent will likely draw a lot more folks than playing FAU, especially if it's considered a conference game...
 
Exit 4 said:
1) Might mean our discussions with the B12 and ACC have really come to an impasse. Of course, I suppose we could sign up for P12 Football only with no GOR/no exit fee for any B12/ACC move...if they would allow it. I want to see what happens this Feb with the ACC/ESPN extension first.

2) Our current independent schedule allows us to build a schedule that has winnable G5 games and also 4 to 5 Power Conf measurement games a year. This year MIGHT play out they way we always intended, winnable schedule to get the recruiting/fanbase mojo restarted, yet also a few reach games. For right now we need to schedule to win.

3) Recruiting... This could work or could be a big fail....seems really high risk though.

Pro:
Great memes
Small boost in our tv $
Slightly improved CFP odds/$
Expand ...
#1 just comes down to the exit fee. If it's $15m or less than it's a no brainier.

Money wouldn't just be slightly higher. It would be significantly higher. What do we get now? $1m from CBS? If this was $4-$6 plus CFB playoff money then we're golden. It also grants us bowl access beyond "whatever we might get"

I don't see how it hurts recruiting at all. A home is better than no home. It also leaves us free to schedule 4 winnable local games a year.
 
WrenchFan69 said:


oh my god it's happening
Expand ...

Its Happening Ron Paul GIF

If Gonzaga is getting a full share as a basketball only, we should get a full share as a football only
 
UConnDan97 said:
I don't mind being designed to win, because it helps change the national perception of us
Expand ...
As the school that accepted the offer that virtually everyone else turned down?
 
Last edited:
.-.
jostar1 said:
Expand ...

This is great. They could have just merged the PAC and MWC which would have been a pretty good conference. Instead they tried to swing some absolute best of the rest and got denied by the AAC programs. Amateurs!
nelsonmuntz said:


How the fudge did this silly slap fight between a bunch of mid-majors in the mountains boomerang right into our nuts?
Expand ...

Funniest thing I've read in a while!

Cracking Up Lol GIF by reactionseditor
 
UConnDan97 said:
I don't mind being designed to win, because it helps change the national perception of us. But I also know that playing Oregon State in The Rent will likely draw a lot more folks than playing FAU, especially if it's considered a conference game...
Expand ...
I don't think so... Purdue, Illinois, Syracuse and BC have all come through and have generated relatively modest attendance impacts. Granted, those our OOC games, but they are also big brands and/or local rivals.

We need winning...winning boosts recruiting...winning boosts fan interest. And then the ball is rolling. Our current set up is well designed for winning...we just got to do it and we might be about to start.

I fear going down the P12 path might quickly derail this momentum. I don't have first hand experience with recruiting...I don't know what parents/kids really want....can Mora sell this? IDK.

But if we can get:
1) no GOR
2) $5M+ per year for football only
3) capped at 7 conf games (so we can control the other 5)
4) some $ to fund all our football scheduling contract breakage fees (we will have many!)
5) fair access to CFB $ & bowls

then maybe you go for it anyway.
 
Exit 4 said:
1) Might mean our discussions with the B12 and ACC have really come to an impasse. Of course, I suppose we could sign up for P12 Football only with no GOR/no exit fee for any B12/ACC move...if they would allow it. I want to see what happens this Feb with the ACC/ESPN extension first.

2) Our current independent schedule allows us to build a schedule that has winnable G5 games and also 4 to 5 Power Conf measurement games a year. This year MIGHT play out they way we always intended, winnable schedule to get the recruiting/fanbase mojo restarted, yet also a few reach games. For right now we need to schedule to win.

3) Recruiting... This could work or could be a big fail....seems really high risk though.

Pro:
Great memes
Small boost in our tv $
Slightly improved CFP odds/$
Expand ...

We need bowl tie ins and something to play for. Independence is an infertile rocky place where our seed can find no purchase.
 
CL82 said:
As the school that excepted the offer that virtually everyone else turned down?
Expand ...
No, I said I don't mind the current schedule we have already built, because it is full of matchups that would be considered "winnable" and we can start to put up strong numbers.

My point was that a schedule with the new Pac12 would be stronger and would put more butts in the seats, even if we take a couple more losses in the process...
 
Exit 4 said:
I don't think so... Purdue, Illinois, Syracuse and BC have all come through and have generated relatively modest attendance impacts. Granted, those our OOC games, but they are also big brands and/or local rivals.

We need winning...winning boosts recruiting...winning boosts fan interest. And then the ball is rolling. Our current set up is well designed for winning...we just got to do it and we might be about to start.

I fear going down the P12 path might quickly derail this momentum. I don't have first hand experience with recruiting...I don't know what parents/kids really want....can Mora sell this? IDK.

But if we can get:
1) no GOR
2) $5M+ per year for football only
3) capped at 7 conf games (so we can control the other 5)
4) some $ to fund all our football scheduling contract breakage fees (we will have many!)
5) fair access to CFB $ & bowls

then maybe you go for it anyway.
Expand ...
Mora can sell a football schedule that allows players to get exposure on both coasts and in all time zones (presumably our 4 OOC games would be east coast games).

And remember, he can expand his recruiting footprint based on the aforementioned geographic expansion. He can also expand his influence in the transfer portal, which appears to be even more important nowadays...
 
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,559
Messages
4,583,138
Members
10,493
Latest member
Mwil1032


Top Bottom