Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 769 | The Boneyard
.-.

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

For many reasons, going Indy is now hard to do.

1....With media tightening their belts, big contracts for an individual Indy may not be there.

2....Parking non football sports could be a problem

3....The Big 10 and Big 12 are now at 9 conference games, With more teams, I could see the ACC following suit if they lose the Notre Dame 5 games a year.

4....After conference play starts in full swing, scheduling good teams might be tough.

Even Notre Dame may not get the big NBC money that they want...

Former Fox Sports Exec Patrick Cates:
“My big-picture thought is that Notre Dame will need a conference to support a three-time bump long term. I think either the Big Ten or SEC would do. Also, don’t rule out a third new conference in several years. A lot of assumptions are falling apart as pay-TV-bundle economics go flat.”
Expand ...
 
HuskyHawk said:
Some people view the ACC through distorted lenses. It's easily the #3 conference, ahead of the Big XII. It's only "unstable" because a few schools think they are worthy of B1G or SEC money (none of the Big XII schools are in that situation). Most of the ACC schools that think that are delusional, just like the Pac schools were.

FSU might attract SEC attention but the B1G wouldn't touch them. Same with Clemson. UNC, playing football as it is now, is probably the main prize. B1G might consider UVA to lock up DC. Maybe.
Expand ...
You are partially correct. It's hard to tell right now if the Big 12 or ACC are better than the other given the recent adds to both conferences which I think are dilutive to both conferences. What is true is if the SEC takes Clemson and FSU, ACC football is dead. Given the uncertainty of the future ACC composition, I think some schools like VT, Pitt, and Louisville would consider a B12 invite right now if they could.
 
It may be a long, long time before anyone leaves the ACC.

Oh we all yak about it...but that GOR dam has to break.

One thing the administration at FSU and Clemson know...no league will have them until the threat of another conference owning all their home games is quelled.
 
UConnJim said:
You are partially correct. It's hard to tell right now if the Big 12 or ACC are better than the other given the recent adds to both conferences which I think are dilutive to both conferences. What is true is if the SEC takes Clemson and FSU, ACC football is dead. Given the uncertainty of the future ACC composition, I think some schools like VT, Pitt, and Louisville would consider a B12 invite right now if they could.
Expand ...
I don't see it. FSU, Clemson and UNC are better than any program in the Big XII. You can argue Miami is as well. Year to year it varies of course, but right now the top two teams in the future incarnation of the Big XII are Utah and Kansas.

It's not just the new adds that dilute the Big XII, the prior additions do as well. Cinci was added coming off a CFB playoff and is dead last, winless in conference. Houston 1-4 (K State just beat them 41-0), UCF winless. BYU is the only competitive one. It's a worse football conference than the ACC even if they lose FSU and Clemson (and they won't anytime soon).

Big XII is in great shape for basketball but is going to be pretty dreadful for football.
 
HuskyHawk said:
I don't see it. FSU, Clemson and UNC are better than any program in the Big XII. You can argue Miami is as well. Year to year it varies of course, but right now the top two teams in the future incarnation of the Big XII are Utah and Kansas.

It's not just the new adds that dilute the Big XII, the prior additions do as well. Cinci was added coming off a CFB playoff and is dead last, winless in conference. Houston 1-4 (K State just beat them 41-0), UCF winless. BYU is the only competitive one. It's a worse football conference than the ACC even if they lose FSU and Clemson (and they won't anytime soon).

Big XII is in great shape for basketball but is going to be pretty dreadful for football.
Expand ...

The new Big 12 has four ranked teams in the new CFP rankings (Utah, Kansas, Oklahoma State and Kansas State). And that is in a down year. I don't know how that is dreadful. And while they are ranked high the ACC only has 2 ranked teams, FSU and Louisville meaning they only have one team if FSU leaves. How does that make them a worse conference, especially when they're doing this with the new schools getting acclimated and are also adding Utah, Colorado and Arizona in football? And saying that the new schools "dilute" the conference is silly, they are getting adjusted to the conference.

You can't use the diluted line while touting how a school like UConn gets better once P5 money and exposure rolls in (which they would). That works for everyone. Cincinnati is a perfect example of these, they were terrible in their first year in the Big East and then exploded after its second year of power conference exposure. The four previous additions can tap into Ohio, Florida, Texas or in BYU's case national exposure and national title tradition. Those schools will be a force soon enough.
 
Last edited:
What teams really prospered after changing conferences ? A minority, I think.

Rutgers...nope

Maryland...last year was the first year that they won 8 games in the the B1G Did not have above a .500 regular season in 7 of 9 seasons in B1G.

WVU...decent but not like the 4X champs they were in the BE.

Miami...hasn't sniffed an ACC Championship in 20 years.

Cuse and BC...nada

Texas A&M...better than in Big 12...but still not an SEC CCG contender

Nebraska...not the Huskers of the Big 12

Colorado....the Pac wasn't their panacea

Penn State....punching their weight...success story, I guess.
 
.-.
billybud said:
What teams really prospered after changing conferences ? A minority, I think.

Rutgers...nope

Maryland...last year was the first year that they won 8 games in the the B1G Did not have above a .500 regular season in 7 of 9 seasons in B1G.

WVU...decent but not like the 4X champs they were in the BE.

Miami...hasn't sniffed an ACC Championship in 20 years.

Cuse and BC...nada

Texas A&M...better than in Big 12...but still not an SEC CCG contender

Nebraska...not the Huskers of the Big 12

Colorado....the Pac wasn't their panacea

Penn State....punching their weight...success story, I guess.
Expand ...
I am not a Rutgers fan, quite the opposite, but they have prospered compared to where they were before B1G money came along. I have said before that of all undeserving athetic programs they hit the jackpot.. and their olympic sports and football have improved. The are middle of the B1G in football now, not ready for OSU or Michigan, but competetive with others, nearly won the B1G in basketball last year, and not so bad in other olympic sports now. All of the above schools have a life raft to guarantee their future, even those that may be in a new ACC after 2036 and that is the most important thing.
 
.-.
Notre Dame currently makes $22m annually for football. We can see where the market goes for it with their next contract, but probably only Ohio State and Alabama are on their level.
 
HuskyHawk said:
I don't see it. FSU, Clemson and UNC are better than any program in the Big XII. You can argue Miami is as well. Year to year it varies of course, but right now the top two teams in the future incarnation of the Big XII are Utah and Kansas.

It's not just the new adds that dilute the Big XII, the prior additions do as well. Cinci was added coming off a CFB playoff and is dead last, winless in conference. Houston 1-4 (K State just beat them 41-0), UCF winless. BYU is the only competitive one. It's a worse football conference than the ACC even if they lose FSU and Clemson (and they won't anytime soon).

Big XII is in great shape for basketball but is going to be pretty dreadful for football.
Expand ...
Since 2005, I think the future Big 12 teams have been somewhat comparable to the ACC, although Clemson has won 2 championships and nobody in the Big 12 has. Miami and UNC have not had a top 10 finish.

Top 10 final rankings since 2005:

Big 12:
TCU: 8
Cincinnati: 3
Oklahoma St.: 3
West Virginia: 3
Baylor: 2
UCF: 2
Utah: 2
Houston: 1
Iowa St.: 1
Kansas: 1
Arizona: 0
Arizona St.: 0
BYU: 0
Colorado: 0
Texas Tech: 0
Total = 26


ACC:
Clemson: 8
FSU: 5
Stanford: 5
Virginia Tech: 3
BC: 1
Georgia Tech: 1
Louisville: 1
Pitt: 1
Cal: 0
Duke: 0
Miami: 0
North Carolina: 0
NC State: 0
SMU: 0
Syracuse: 0
Virginia: 0
Wake Forest: 0
Total = 25

If Clemson or FSU leave the ACC down the road, the Big 12 is the clear better football conference.
 
UConnJim said:
Since 2005, I think the future Big 12 teams have been somewhat comparable to the ACC, although Clemson has won 2 championships and nobody in the Big 12 has. Miami and UNC have not had a top 10 finish.

Top 10 final rankings since 2005:

Big 12:
TCU: 8
Cincinnati: 3
Oklahoma St.: 3
West Virginia: 3
Baylor: 2
UCF: 2
Utah: 2
Houston: 1
Iowa St.: 1
Kansas: 1
Arizona: 0
Arizona St.: 0
BYU: 0
Colorado: 0
Texas Tech: 0
Total = 26


ACC:
Clemson: 8
FSU: 5
Stanford: 5
Virginia Tech: 3
BC: 1
Georgia Tech: 1
Louisville: 1
Pitt: 1
Cal: 0
Duke: 0
Miami: 0
North Carolina: 0
NC State: 0
SMU: 0
Syracuse: 0
Virginia: 0
Wake Forest: 0
Total = 25

If Clemson or FSU leave the ACC down the road, the Big 12 is the clear better football conference.
Expand ...
Top 10 is not the relevant measure. Look at Bowl games, Top 25 and TV ratings. Arizona and Miami are not equivalent for TV purposes. Nor are North Carolina and Arizona State. This measure underrates BYU, which is valuable.
 
HuskyHawk said:
Top 10 is not the relevant measure. Look at Bowl games, Top 25 and TV ratings. Arizona and Miami are not equivalent for TV purposes. Nor are North Carolina and Arizona State. This measure underrates BYU, which is valuable.
Expand ...
How can Miami and UNC be better programs when they haven’t had a recent top 10 finish? Attendance is about a wash. As for TV ratings, the Big 12’s championship game last year with Kansas St./TCU had almost triple the TV ratings if the ACC Championship game of Clemson/UNC. The Big 12 game was noon Saturday with no competition and the ACC game was Saturday night and went up against Big 10.
 
UConnJim said:
How can Miami and UNC be better programs when they haven’t had a recent top 10 finish? Attendance is about a wash. As for TV ratings, the Big 12’s championship game last year with Kansas St./TCU had almost triple the TV ratings if the ACC Championship game of Clemson/UNC. The Big 12 game was noon Saturday with no competition and the ACC game was Saturday night and went up against Big 10.
Expand ...
Top 10 is an arbitrary and irrelevant metric. Nobody cares about that. The time of those games tells the story, one is worthy of prime time, the other was not. TCU also drew ratings because a win put them in the playoff, and some fans were rooting against that. I like the Big XII, I grew up a Big 8 fan, but without OU and UT it is pretty weak.
 
HuskyHawk said:
Top 10 is an arbitrary and irrelevant metric. Nobody cares about that. The time of those games tells the story, one is worthy of prime time, the other was not. TCU also drew ratings because a win put them in the playoff, and some fans were rooting against that. I like the Big XII, I grew up a Big 8 fan, but without OU and UT it is pretty weak.
Expand ...
Sagarin ratings adjusted for new additions and subtractions for the ACC and Big 12:

ACC: 73.57
Big 12: 75.88
 
.-.
ZooCougar said:
When a coach says he “needs more NIL” what he is basically saying is that he needs a bigger payroll.
Expand ...
This. The college sports we used to know is no longer, it is now basically a pro sports lite now. It is just a matter of time top teams will have the biggest payroll. NIL is just another form of compensation like payroll. It sucks for schools like UConn with our lack of revenue, but that's the new reality.
 
WestCoastHusky said:
This. The college sports we used to know is no longer, it is now basically a pro sports lite now. It is just a matter of time top teams will have the biggest payroll. NIL is just another form of compensation like payroll. It sucks for schools like UConn with our lack of revenue, but that's the new reality.
Expand ...
And it’s only going to get worse.

Currently the kids are getting paid thru the guise of NIL. Very soon they will be receiving payment directly from the schools.

The NCAA is done. We will end up with multiple “entities” that will oversee college athletics. The SEC & B1G will set the “guidelines” for whatever the new “big boy” organization will be. Everyone else will fall in line by class according to what they can afford to spend
 
BigTenFan said:
Yes- that is absolutely true but Uconn won't be in B1G 10 anytime soon. I think Uconn's best shot at getting out of football purgatory is finding a way into ACC.
There is no money being an independent and highly recruited HS players want to be on National TV on Saturday -
Expand ...


I think you are right. If the B1G passed on Stanford and Cal, they are passing on UConn.

The B1G will only add whoever FOX/NBC/CBS deems worthy.
 
Rufus said:
I think you are right. If the B1G passed on Stanford and Cal, they are passing on UConn.

The B1G will only add whoever FOX/NBC/CBS deems worthy.
Expand ...
I think the Big 10 passed on Stanford and Cal because the timing was not right. And, the Big 10 didn't want to take Washington and Oregon at first. LT, I think Stanford and Cal are going to the Big 10 in a western pod with USC/UCLA/Washington/Oregon. In the meantime, they are in the ACC, probably until the GOR expires.
 
.-.
UConnJim said:
I think the Big 10 passed on Stanford and Cal because the timing was not right. And, the Big 10 didn't want to take Washington and Oregon at first. LT, I think Stanford and Cal are going to the Big 10 in a western pod with USC/UCLA/Washington/Oregon. In the meantime, they are in the ACC, probably until the GOR expires.
Expand ...
You would think that Calford made the same pitch to the B1G that they made to the ACC about coming in at a reduced rate and the B1G passed.

Why would they want to add them in the future at a full share? Having 4 Western schools is plenty to enable non-football scheduling. Adding them doesn’t bring any addition dollars
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Online statistics

Members online
149
Guests online
6,026
Total visitors
6,175
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,971
Messages
4,462,245
Members
10,332
Latest member
Sir Oolick


Top Bottom