- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 100,655
- Reaction Score
- 407,354
They’re all nuts…
"Major programs"?Of course SDSU would be the one to lead this. They aren't making any friends, that's for sure! Between SDSU causing trouble in the MW, Arizona State and Utah looking down at the Big 12, and FSU more or less with the finger on the trigger to leave the ACC, there is lots of public drama going on in college sports!
But we lack a long history in football and our program has been terrible for many years. Leaving the AAC killed our football program and our image.It’s not just bad enough where west coast teams and SMU are being talked about over us in an east coast league. It’s that we aren’t even being mentioned as a possibility when we are in the footprint, just won a natty, and had a football coach of the year candidate who has coached in a P5 league and the NFL. And the network impacting the decision is within our borders. You can’t make it up.
Mike Aresco or his kicker/punter grand kid, which are you?But we lack a long history in football and our program has been terrible for many years. Leaving the AAC killed our football program and our image.
No. He's there for only a few years, and at some point, every governor is going to have to answer, are the tuition increases sustainable?So if hypothetically the governor of the State showed up at a UConn football practice today, expressed his support for the program and the athletic department, and specifically declared on the record that the athletics deficit was not a major concern, would that be enough to satisfy the "it's not sustainable" crowd here?
BCU is not as bad as you claim. They're only terrible now. In the 80s they were pretty good. Nor am I certain you'll be kicked out of the ACC. It's probable, but not at all assured. Although I do give you guys credit: you gave UConn a pretty tough game last year.But we lack a long history in football and our program has been terrible for many years. Leaving the ACC killed our football program and our image.
You realize the 80’s were 35 years ago.BCU is not as bad as you claim. They're only terrible now. In the 80s they were pretty good. Nor am I certain you'll be kicked out of the ACC. It's probable, but not at all assured. Although I do give you guys credit: you gave UConn a pretty tough game last year.
???They wanted to shed Oregon State and Washington State. Those two schools were arguably the two least valuable remaining properties in the P5, and like we've seen so many other times in realignment, survival came down to whichever league had the least amount of dead weight. This is how the Big 12 outlived the PAC-12 and why it will probably outlive the ACC despite having lesser brands on the whole.
Yes, but you haven't seen a cereal named after a college football player since then, have you?You realize the 80’s were 35 years ago.
Texas is the best state for football, certainly, but at some point, that well is going to run dry.Ugh, literally the landing space in between.....but a whole new state for ACCN and recruiting. I hate to say it....but it sounds feasible.
Had to Google it…. Says they came out in 1998. Nothing to do with BC.Yes, but you haven't seen a cereal named after a college football player since then, have you?
At some point, the talent is going to be totally drained.
They did all that...Who's giving the directive? In the face of the deficit it's never made sense to me how they've built a new hoop practice facility, built a hockey arena, new baseball stadium, upgraded soccer stadium, softball field, and keep improving the Burton facility. Along with making Hurley a top 5? highest paid coach in America.
I get some or even a lot of that money was through donations but if we were at the point where we'd need to consider budget cuts (cutting programs) it's an awfully odd way to go about it.
OK, they did it for a Canadian football star then.Had to Google it…. Says they came out in 1998. Nothing to do with BC.
Simple. ACC Network and carriage fees in a large metro area and state. If the ACC takes SMU it’s a ST solution, but LT mistake.How in the world is smu even in the conversation. This has to be a joke or some bad Intel. There are probably high-school teams that outdraw them.
Anyone remember the SMU Pony Express with Eric Dickerson?Texas is the best state for football, certainly, but at some point, that well is going to run dry.
Look at the schools that rely on Texas talent: Texas, Texas A&M, TCU, Baylor, Houston, Texas Tech, Oklahoma, Oklahoma St, LSU.
9 P4 schools have Texas as their prime recruiting territory.
Is there room for one more in SMU?
At some point, the talent is going to be totally drained.
Isn't the acc network already in Dallas?Simple. ACC Network and carriage fees in a large metro area and state. If the ACC takes SMU it’s a ST solution, but LT mistake.
Yup... Craig James, Patriots '86 Super Bowl team.Anyone remember the SMU Pony Express with Eric Dickerson?
This all started because of my joke post for our resident impostor NE football. It wasn't a serious discussion.I enjoy making fun of BC as much as anyone and I still believe if Flutie was say 6' or 6'1" he would have been viewed as just a pretty good college QB, not a Heisman candidate, much less winner.
That said, I'm pretty sure Flutie Flakes were a fundraiser for his (very young) kid who was born with some affliction (don't recall what specifically). It is something no infant should ever have to endure and no parents should ever have to deal with.
You have to wonder if cable systems in states like California or Texas are going to say, YES, ACC, we agree to jack up everyone's rate by 50 cents so ALL our cable subscribers can watch SMU or Stanford.Simple. ACC Network and carriage fees in a large metro area and state. If the ACC takes SMU it’s a ST solution, but LT mistake.
ESPN might have a springing clause in their contracts whereby ACCN is added when a school is added in their DMA. But if not, these communities will want the channel.You have to wonder if cable systems in states like California or Texas are going to say, YES, ACC, we agree to jack up everyone's rate by 50 cents so ALL our cable subscribers can watch SMU or Stanford.
This doesn't seem feasible to me.