- Joined
- May 21, 2018
- Messages
- 257
- Reaction Score
- 598
I get the Big East attachment, but for me, the Big East attachment died when Cuse, BC et al left. It just wasn't the same. We have a P5, 4,3 operation. An argument can be made that when UCF, BYU et all we're added to the XII that our facilities and performance, at the time weren't up to par. That narrative has changed dramatically. We check too many boxes to be left out again. I never forget rule #1 but we bring too much to the table now to be overlooked. (depending on the source, We have the #30 media market which overlaps #1 and #9. BY talks about adding value, it appears he gets that with UConn. I'm not trying to disrespect any schools, yes our football has seen better days, but what has CU, UA, ASU done in football in recent memory, 1 Natty from 33 years ago. Yes football drives the bus but something also has to be said about our collection of Natties across multiple sports. Yes, XII doesn't sponsor some of our sports, my point is just about every sport UC participates in, we're successful. XII already has BYU, do they bring SLC market or does Utah? I would think UConn's status as a flagship in a new market would bring more to a new conference as opposed to another school in a state that you already have. I remain cautiously optimistic.This is great
"There are, of course, emotional ties to the Big East and certain fans who would cast away football for a sole focus on basketball in the Big East. But the university has shown it will support football aggressively, the motivation being that the sport, in this landscape, has to be driving a bus that carries every UConn program to a place from which it can win."
"The rest lines up just fine. Look across the nation, across platforms: Does any program, in its major sports, have a better four-coach lineup than Mora, Hurley, Geno Auriemma and Jim Penders? The Huskies win in Olympic sports, too. UConn has a big-time feel and a big-time operation without a big-time affiliation. It needs one."
