Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 412 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

There are plenty of reasons why Colorado would prefer the PAC 12, but the only question they truly need to answer is, are we better leaving now or in a few years when 2-4 more schools are gone to the Big 10? If you believe that is going to happen, is there any other option but leaving now? I’m sure they are disappointed to be in this situation, but they’ve been an irrelevant athletic department for a few decades. If not for Denver and solid academics, they’d be a good fit in the Mountain West.
I’m guessing that the general consensus here is that Colorado is willing to stick around pending a fair TV deal. If the PAC gets something reasonably close to the B12, they stay put and wait. They know the B1G may be grabbing a few schools and if that causes the PAC to implode, they believe they have a life raft via the B12.

Not sure what the number is that will spook CU to bolt but I have to imagine that anything less than $20m/yr is going to be tough to swallow.
 
There are plenty of reasons why Colorado would prefer the PAC 12, but the only question they truly need to answer is, are we better leaving now or in a few years when 2-4 more schools are gone to the Big 10? If you believe that is going to happen, is there any other option but leaving now? I’m sure they are disappointed to be in this situation, but they’ve been an irrelevant athletic department for a few decades. If not for Denver and solid academics, they’d be a good fit in the Mountain West.
That is not a question that any serious person needs to answer. Like the person who has waited for a promotion for years turning it down because he wants to take an internal transfer to another department and he thinks that would make it less likely. In the history of corporate HR worldwide that has never happened. Only in idle speculation has it ever occurred.
 
Arggggghhhh! I just want off this rollercoaster.
Yeah, the only way to win is not to play. But personally I will give it another week. I do think it would be more effective to announce at the half at the NCST game though.
 
...
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2023-07-23 at 11.14.04 AM (1).png
    Screen Shot 2023-07-23 at 11.14.04 AM (1).png
    772.1 KB · Views: 223
I’m guessing that the general consensus here is that Colorado is willing to stick around pending a fair TV deal. If the PAC gets something reasonably close to the B12, they stay put and wait. They know the B1G may be grabbing a few schools and if that causes the PAC to implode, they believe they have a life raft via the B12.

Not sure what the number is that will spook CU to bolt but I have to imagine that anything less than $20m/yr is going to be tough to swallow.
Would have to think the linear partner and linear v paid streaming will be a big factor.
 
.-.
That is not a question that any serious person needs to answer. Like the person who has waited for a promotion for years turning it down because he wants to take an internal transfer to another department and he thinks that would make it less likely. In the history of corporate HR worldwide that has never happened. Only in idle speculation has it ever occurred.
 
It’s ok to be a contrarian, but you should make some sense. 1/100 would be an improvement.
 
There are plenty of reasons why Colorado would prefer the PAC 12, but the only question they truly need to answer is, are we better leaving now or in a few years when 2-4 more schools are gone to the Big 10? If you believe that is going to happen, is there any other option but leaving now? I’m sure they are disappointed to be in this situation, but they’ve been an irrelevant athletic department for a few decades. If not for Denver and solid academics, they’d be a good fit in the Mountain West.
Washington and Oregon to the B10 seems like an inevitability at some point. Once that happens, what is the incentive for the AZ schools to stick around? If I was CU, I’d be making the leap to the Big 12 and trying to get some others to follow
 
Washington and Oregon to the B10 seems like an inevitability at some point. Once that happens, what is the incentive for the AZ schools to stick around? If I was CU, I’d be making the leap to the Big 12 and trying to get some others to follow
Not really. Conferences can only grow as large as TV partners are willing to pay, and Notre Dame and North Carolina are the Big 10's top two targets. Why settle if you don't have to?
 
.-.
Wait... Big 12 isn't a good geographic fit but leaving the AAC, which has a very similar geographic footprint, was the wrong call? lmfao at least try to have some consistency
The 40mil in additional $ makes it a much easier pill to swallow
 
Buddy it is never ending. IF we do move to the B12 the ok let’s try and get to the ACC or B1G when they take more teams. It will never end lol
True…. Sadly UConn is one of two former BCS schools not in P5 conference, excluding ND.

But I think this time is different. We’d potentially be in stronger league that would still be acquirer vs target in next round.

I could live with Big 12 over depleted ACC. Especially if a couple more eastern teams are plucked.
 

Colorado is leaving the PAC unless the PAC has A LOT of magic happen. PAC is a west coast conference, which has much less appeal/value than the other P5 conferences. Plus they lost the two major national athletic schools to the B1G.

Colorado knows the B12 is their lifeboat to long term stability, money, and relevance. They won’t say yes to the B12 until they review the PAC numbers (due diligence), but they are leaving the PAC
 


- Big 12 TV deal with ESPN/FOX is “60% of conference revenue”

- Reiterates “if something is additive, we certainly need to pursue it”

- We have guiding principles for expansion: “Leadership, Cultural Fit, Brand Upside, Geography, Athletic Performance”

- “I want to be a national conference”

- “Basketball is an important part of expansion too”

- Says basketball can lead to “international opportunities”. Says he has communications with Adam Silver on importance and future of basketball.
 
.-.


- Big 12 TV deal with ESPN/FOX is “60% of conference revenue”

- Reiterates “if something is additive, we certainly need to pursue it”

- We have guiding principles for expansion: “Leadership, Cultural Fit, Brand Upside, Geography, Athletic Performance”

- “I want to be a national conference”

- “Basketball is an important part of expansion too”

- Says basketball can lead to “international opportunities”. Says he has communications with Adam Silver on importance and future of basketball.

Well, that's a positive, Adam Silver has a regular history of standing on stage next to UConn basketball players, and that is going to happen with even more regularity moving foreward.
 
.-.
ACC Football Media Day Minutes (7/25/23)

-> Q. You talked a lot about where you are in terms of the conference and looking at growing and expanding and bridging that gap. One of the biggest things that's out there that people constantly whisper about with the ACC, a team that's on the slate of televised games for ACC is Notre Dame. Is there any progress towards getting Notre Dame to join as a full member with football as well, or is that not something that's on the table at the moment?

JIM PHILLIPS: Another really good question. We've had a lot of conversations, let me put it bluntly, with Notre Dame, and they've been very clear. They value their independence, and I think they feel strongly that that will continue well into the future.

If they ever have the desire of joining the conference, they know that we would welcome them with open arms, but I think -- I can't speak for Jack right now and Pete in the future or Father John, but I think it's been a healthy relationship both ways for the ACC and for Notre Dame.

They’re sports, other than football, I think have thrived in the ACC. I think they really enjoy the academic prowess that the ACC brings as well, but they've been pretty clear about their desire to stay independent. So I don't see that changing any time soon. <-
 
ACC Football Media Day Minutes (7/25/23)

-> Q. You talked a lot about where you are in terms of the conference and looking at growing and expanding and bridging that gap. One of the biggest things that's out there that people constantly whisper about with the ACC, a team that's on the slate of televised games for ACC is Notre Dame. Is there any progress towards getting Notre Dame to join as a full member with football as well, or is that not something that's on the table at the moment?

JIM PHILLIPS: Another really good question. We've had a lot of conversations, let me put it bluntly, with Notre Dame, and they've been very clear. They value their independence, and I think they feel strongly that that will continue well into the future.

If they ever have the desire of joining the conference, they know that we would welcome them with open arms, but I think -- I can't speak for Jack right now and Pete in the future or Father John, but I think it's been a healthy relationship both ways for the ACC and for Notre Dame.

They’re sports, other than football, I think have thrived in the ACC. I think they really enjoy the academic prowess that the ACC brings as well, but they've been pretty clear about their desire to stay independent. So I don't see that changing any time soon. <-
So nothing new.
 
ACC Football Media Day Minutes (7/25/23)

-> Q. You talked a lot about where you are in terms of the conference and looking at growing and expanding and bridging that gap. One of the biggest things that's out there that people constantly whisper about with the ACC, a team that's on the slate of televised games for ACC is Notre Dame. Is there any progress towards getting Notre Dame to join as a full member with football as well, or is that not something that's on the table at the moment?

JIM PHILLIPS: Another really good question. We've had a lot of conversations, let me put it bluntly, with Notre Dame, and they've been very clear. They value their independence, and I think they feel strongly that that will continue well into the future.

If they ever have the desire of joining the conference, they know that we would welcome them with open arms, but I think -- I can't speak for Jack right now and Pete in the future or Father John, but I think it's been a healthy relationship both ways for the ACC and for Notre Dame.

They’re sports, other than football, I think have thrived in the ACC. I think they really enjoy the academic prowess that the ACC brings as well, but they've been pretty clear about their desire to stay independent. So I don't see that changing any time soon. <-
How is Jim Phillips still the ACC commissioner? He was the AD at Northwestern from 2008 to 2021 during the football hazing issues.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,190
Messages
4,556,230
Members
10,441
Latest member
Virginiafan


Top Bottom