The vast majority of P4 schools rely on the state for facility improvements. Michigan does. Texas does. Donors don't pay for stadiums, except in the case of T Boone Pickens and the $450m he donated (then rescinded because he lost all his money, only to give it again a decade later). The bonding for those projects goes through the school, not the AD. So does the debt service. You won't see debt service for facilities on the AD's balance sheet. And if donors pony up for stadiums, the money never goes to the construction of the stadium itself. Instead, it becomes athletic donor revenue.Bingo- the concern is the lack of big time athletics donors/fundraising (which is something UConn has struggled with for years). Relying on the state to fund improvements to facilities (look at how long its taken to do anything at The Rent, XL, Gampel as an example) rather than a large base of donors is one of many things that highlight the existing issue, along with the lack of initiative related to NIL and low fundraising amount as it relates to football.
I would hope as part of the presentation, AD David Benedict has a list of high end donors willing to step up with multi-year commitments once it becomes official.
Yes. But most or all of it is to pay us. Maybe a little of it would go to the other schools to pay travel expenses. Adding UConn is supposed to be revenue neutral to the other schools.Wait is ESPN offering to up the Big 12 Media deal to add us?
There is only one or two left. They can’t do everything. And, there is no dedicated college football writer at any of the legacy papers.Our state media is worthless
My way of thinking is it is either tomorrow because they have the votes or "still working out the details" because BY doesn't have the votes and turns to hoping that Mora's boys change some minds by not being awful.I think the only thing left of concern is finding out when they will take an official vote. Especially if Zanetto is correct that the needed votes are secured and all these meetings are formalities. You'd think the final pitch and vote would be before College Football really kicks off.
Hopefully don’t need to sweeten it if Yormark & Endeavor can convince 6 of them to join the 6 schools already on board. If they’re on the fence, the benefit of the doubt should go to Yormark.Gotta wonder which of the 8 schools voted yes or no and which ones of the remaining 8 are left undecided.
And what it would take to sweeten the deal for everyone so we get the 12 needed votes.
Possible alternative consideration: After Big 12 presidents potentially just received media details, Endeavor’s reports, more information from UConn, etc, why would anyone reasonably believe undocumented rumors to be accurate? Alternatively, what’s the likelihood no university presidents would be compelled to share important updates with their respective board of trustees before any formal votes would occur? Bit early in the process? To be determined.I don’t really understand the assumption that yormark still has the votes when it was just reported that the unofficial vote was 6-2 and at least a couple schools still needed convincing. Otherwise the latest intel would be along the lines of “yormark still has the votes…”
That wasn't an "unofficial" vote. Dodd got info about 8 schools.I don’t really understand the assumption that yormark still has the votes when it was just reported that the unofficial vote was 6-2 and at least a couple schools still needed convincing. Otherwise wouldn’t the latest intel be along the lines of “yormark still has the votes…”
It seems he's never had the votes to begin with. He's trying to persuade themI don’t really understand the assumption that yormark still has the votes when it was just reported that the unofficial vote was 6-2 and at least a couple schools still needed convincing. Otherwise wouldn’t the latest intel be along the lines of “yormark still has the votes…”
The loss of UConn on its channels really hurts espn hoops credibility.This feels illegal but it's probably not. It's surely a conflict of interest.
Oklahoma State will vote no even if it's 15-1Also the two no votes…guarantee one is Oklahoma State and other is TCU?
Thst would be my guess.
Et tu, former Big East partner?Also the two no votes…guarantee one is Oklahoma State and other is TCU?
Okie really is one of those schools that is tied to being southwest football culturally.Oklahoma State will vote no even if it's 15-1
I would almost certainly bet the other no is Utah given their vocal displeasure with joining and wanting to be in as strong of a football league as possibleAlso the two no votes…guarantee one is Oklahoma State and other is TCU?
Thst would be my guess.
TCU didn't play any games in the Big East.Et tu, former Big East partner?
If you've ever been to Stillwater, you would sympathize with those poor people. This is all they have. By the way, the water is not still in Stillwater. But there's still some water left there. And that's how it got its name.Okie really is one of those schools that is tied to being southwest football culturally.
Except UConn actually has excellent NIL for basketball And reasonably good NIL for football.Bingo- the concern is the lack of big time athletics donors/fundraising (which is something UConn has struggled with for years). Relying on the state to fund improvements to facilities (look at how long its taken to do anything at The Rent, XL, Gampel as an example) rather than a large base of donors is one of many things that highlight the existing issue, along with the lack of initiative related to NIL and low fundraising amount as it relates to football.
I would hope as part of the presentation, AD David Benedict has a list of high end donors willing to step up with multi-year commitments once it becomes official.
Reasonably good would depend who you are comparing us to. Football funding is the issue here.Except UConn actually has excellent NIL for basketball And reasonably good NIL for football.
Look at the portal class we have this year. We are able to compete with P4 schools.Reasonably good would depend who you are comparing us to. Football funding is the issue here.
I think it’s OSU and Utah. TT and UCF leaning no. So perhaps it all comes down to Colorado. Don’t those Coloradoites realize NE has a ton of HS seniors who are rich and like weed?Also the two no votes…guarantee one is Oklahoma State and other is TCU?
Thst would be my guess.
You're guaranteeing a guess?Also the two no votes…guarantee one is Oklahoma State and other is TCU?
Thst would be my guess.