- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 27,809
- Reaction Score
- 38,631
I’d be shocked if any of the B12 Presidents know ( or care) anything about NIL.
Then you are out of touch.
I’d be shocked if any of the B12 Presidents know ( or care) anything about NIL.
really? The Big 12 didn't think so
Such an obviously large brand. I don't think you understood this clearly enough. What you think about basketball does not matter. You are not invited to their party. You will be left out. The party is the P2 and they will exclude everybody that isn't them.
"We were a lock until they had better options. But next time when they have better options it'll be different!"
The Big XII presidents were obsessed with adding more "power five schools"
That is all they cared about.
I like your line of thinking. That would be nice.UConn isn't getting into the P2 but they are the highest-earning G5, the only one above 100M annually and about on par with Colorado, KState and NC State. We were right around BYU level as the massive G5s and they made the P5 jump. As the sole member of this group left we will likely be the last G5 making the jump for a long time
We almost got into the B12 alone with our championship run last year (and yes, we were confirmed as an approved addition before the four corner schools all became available at once). This year our viewership has skyrocketed even more and this is disregarding the fact we are on the cusp of another legendary March Madness run and all the attention that comes with. It's the perfect time considering the ACC and B12 are destabilizing and looking for members right now
UConn could be receiving a B12 or ACC invite as early as this summer, don't let Zoo or the other people here tell you otherwise
UConn is already P5 level in revenue. They are notWhen they add, they won’t add any G5. And if they do, it would be like Tulane/Memphis/USF.
I think we are above those three in the pecking order but it won't matterWhen they add, they won’t add any G5. And if they do, it would be like Tulane/Memphis/USF.
Nothing is a lock until the papers are signed. I don't agree that Plan A was just about a virtual certainty. We waited all year for the PAC to get their medial deal, then things fell apart quickly. UConn was under serious consideration for a long time until the PAC fell apart. The Baylor AD even came out and said that certain G5 schools could get pro-rata share. When the PAC collapsed, those schools dropped into their lap. Of course the Big 12 was going to go with P5 schools in their geographic area.We were never ever ever a lock.
We were plan B. And plan A was just about a virtual certainty.
You guys are kidding yourselves if you think otherwise.
Why be personally ugly. A forum is like a bar with a group of guys chatting. Yeah, he said nothing new. But he also stated a truth. The language of conference realignment has been football.Wait. UConn is in trouble on football? Holy $@!$#. How did you figure that out, because all the signs are that things are great. You must be the smartest guy on the Internet for coming up with UConn football is not in a great place. Have you had your IQ tested?
There has been a lot of personal ugliness and bitterness on this forum lately. Let it go. This board was started 13 years ago. I've been on it the whole time. We're all frustrated, but there is no need for the nastiness.Why be personally ugly. A forum is like a bar with a group of guys chatting. Yeah, he said nothing new. But he also stated a truth. The language of conference realignment has been football.
So those programs had more value than UConn. Well, at least we're getting somewhere. Massive brand value, less than Utah.Reason we are not in the B12 is because the 4 corner schools fell into their lap, which happened to include the brand of Deion Sanders and another top 10 basketball brand.
You really think the P2 are going to exclude Kansas, Arizona and Duke from sport? If so, the one that doesn't understand this clearly is you
Are you even a UConn fan?So those programs had more value than UConn. Well, at least we're getting somewhere. Massive brand value, less than Utah.
Nothing is a lock until the papers are signed. I don't agree that Plan A was just about a virtual certainty. We waited all year for the PAC to get their medial deal, then things fell apart quickly. UConn was under serious consideration for a long time until the PAC fell apart. The Baylor AD even came out and said that certain G5 schools could get pro-rata share. When the PAC collapsed, those schools dropped into their lap. Of course the Big 12 was going to go with P5 schools in their geographic area.
I don't know if that's exactly true. I think they preferred P5 options, but if none were available we were in with Colorado."We were a lock until they had better options. But next time when they have better options it'll be different!"
The Big XII presidents were obsessed with adding more "power five schools"
That is all they cared about.
More than OSU, Wazzu, Cal, StanfordSo those programs had more value than UConn. Well, at least we're getting somewhere. Massive brand value, less than Utah.
No way, as well as many others in this threadAre you even a UConn fan?
If the ADs of other schools were informed about the plan then it was real, this is not trueUConn was used. The plan all along was to get the 4 corners and Utah.
Yormark just used UConn to let people think they had alternative. The Big 12 presidents and ADs were never on board with taking UConn. There might have been a few but it wasn’t enough to make a difference.
Is this the Pollard interview you are referencing or is there another?We were 100% a lock if not for all the four corner schools joining as Jamie Pollard revealed. There is a timeline where UConn is in the B12 and the presidents approved it, maybe after a bit of initial deliberation.
If the ADs of other schools were informed about the plan then it was real, this is not true
If the ADs of other schools were informed about the plan then it was real, this is not true
so what is this? Sounds like a plan to me, the same interview I mentioned to you that you continue to ignoreHe doesn’t have a plan. The schools have a plan and they vote on it. He never had the votes for UConn.
You’re so clueless. He doesn’t run the conference like an authoritarian dictator. He’s the errand boy for the member institutions.
Is this the Pollard interview you are referencing or is there another?
ISU AD Hints That UConn Was Part of Big 12's Expansion Focus
After Colorado made the jump to the Big 12 around two weeks ago, the public’s focus shifted to the rest of the Pac-12 and where they might end up. Sure, there was noise about UConn potentially coming in as the 14th school, but there wasn’t any validity to that, right? You bet there was. That […]www.heartlandcollegesports.com
so what is this? Sounds like a plan to me
Absolutely nothing you have said in this thread has any sort of basis, your argument has no valueRead up.
This article doesn’t help your argument.