Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 814 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
1,469
Reaction Score
5,984
Does having UConn basketball in your conference will make you more money than not having them?

The answer is clearly yes
Its not quite that simple... it's do they make you more many than you'd have to pay out for them. If UConn had taken a reduced deal maybe they would be in the Big XII, but that wasn't in vogue yet.. heck the Big XII was desperate enough that they negotiated differences into some of the Pac-12 additions deals. Utah was excluded from the provision that would've bound them to the conference for 99 years and Colorado got a signing bonus.
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Messages
2,238
Reaction Score
6,618
UConn isn't getting into the P2 but they are the highest-earning G5, the only one above 100M annually and about on par with Colorado, KState and NC State. We were right around BYU level as the massive G5s and they made the P5 jump. As the sole member of this group left we will likely be the last G5 making the jump for a long time


We almost got into the B12 alone with our championship run last year (and yes, we were confirmed as an approved addition before the four corner schools all became available at once). This year our viewership has skyrocketed even more and this is disregarding the fact we are on the cusp of another legendary March Madness run and all the attention that comes with. It's the perfect time considering the ACC and B12 are destabilizing and looking for members right now


UConn could be receiving a B12 or ACC invite as early as this summer, don't let Zoo or the other people here tell you otherwise
I can’t remember his name but we used to have a poster who was insistent there was gonna be a bidding war between the Big and ACC over us. Maybe you changed your name
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2024
Messages
363
Reaction Score
1,481
I can’t remember his name but we used to have a poster who was insistent there was gonna be a bidding war between the Big and ACC over us. Maybe you changed your name
That's not me but I am confident UConn will receive a bid from someone. College athletics have changed so much over the course of the past few years. The B12 and ACC are de-emphasizing football as they can't compete with the P2 and there's only so many brands left they can acquire to protect themselves
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 11, 2024
Messages
363
Reaction Score
1,481
Who exactly do you think is going to be left in the ACC? Are you people this clueless? It's PAC-2 all over again
The only guys likely leaving the ACC are UNC, UVA, FSU, and maybe Clemson. There's still a lot of big brands left, including our old rivals. I also wouldn't be surprised if we saw a Big East-ACC basketball merger one day to counteract the B12 basketball dominance
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
27,505
Reaction Score
37,271
Why would it provide more money? The conference isn't going to exist in a few years

LOL. Don’t even try with these people.

When it all falls apart, CalFord will probably link up with the PAC-2 and maybe they raid the MWC. Or join the MWC.

People here are torturing themselves needlessly.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2015
Messages
21,125
Reaction Score
53,299
The only guys likely leaving the ACC are UNC, UVA, FSU, and maybe Clemson. There's still a lot of big brands left, including our old rivals. I also wouldn't be surprised if we saw a Big East-ACC basketball merger one day to counteract the B12 basketball dominance
Yeah ok. Someone hasn't been paying attention.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
27,505
Reaction Score
37,271
If it provides more money and CFP payout? UConn needs the cash for so many reasons including paying the BB coaching staff.

You have to have a conference to get more money.

Whatever is left will get a temporary PAC 2 type deal.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
27,505
Reaction Score
37,271
I can’t remember his name but we used to have a poster who was insistent there was gonna be a bidding war between the Big and ACC over us. Maybe you changed your name

Butch
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
27,505
Reaction Score
37,271
Its not quite that simple... it's do they make you more many than you'd have to pay out for them. If UConn had taken a reduced deal maybe they would be in the Big XII, but that wasn't in vogue yet.. heck the Big XII was desperate enough that they negotiated differences into some of the Pac-12 additions deals. Utah was excluded from the provision that would've bound them to the conference for 99 years and Colorado got a signing bonus.

The only way we should accept a reduced deal is if football is involved.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
27,505
Reaction Score
37,271
Joining the ACC at this point in time would be the dumbest decision ever

We don’t even know what the ACC would be. These people don’t want to look before they leap.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2015
Messages
21,125
Reaction Score
53,299
Oh yes how could I forget, the B1G has dibs on Boston College.
Yeah you're right we should join the conference that's going to be BC, Wake, Tulane, USF, Memphis, Temple, Cal, Stanford, OSU, SMU and WSU. Perfect fit. Brilliant idea.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2024
Messages
363
Reaction Score
1,481
Yeah you're right we should join the conference that's going to be BC, Wake, Tulane, USF, Memphis, Temple, Cal, Stanford, OSU, SMU and WSU. Perfect fit. Brilliant idea.
If UConn is getting the actual media revenue it needs to support itself then why not? Is the argument about bad basketball? In that case, what happened to Syracuse, Pitt, Louisville, Duke, VT, and NC State in your list? They aren't leaving unless it's to the B12 which is another likely destination for UConn

Also again, a BE-ACC basketball superconference is a possibility and was even brought up by the hosts during our College Gameday appearance
 
Last edited:

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
59,339
Reaction Score
221,435
Yeah you're right we should join the conference that's going to be BC, Wake, Tulane, USF, Memphis, Temple, Cal, Stanford, OSU, SMU and WSU. Perfect fit. Brilliant idea.
You forgot Syracuse. That's OK, pretty much everyone else has too.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2015
Messages
21,125
Reaction Score
53,299
If UConn is getting the actual media revenue it needs to support itself then why not? Is the argument about bad basketball? In that case, what happened to Syracuse, Pitt, Louisville, Duke, VT, and NC State in your list? They aren't leaving unless it's to the B12 which is another likely destination for UConn

Also again, a BE-ACC basketball superconference is a possibility and was even brought up by the hosts during our College Gameday appearance
Because there won't be any revenue. At the very best you're looking at Georgia Tech, Wake, BC and Syracuse remaining and at that point the conference is dead and they'll have to redo a media deal.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
59,339
Reaction Score
221,435
Because there won't be any revenue. At the very best you're looking at Georgia Tech, Wake, BC and Syracuse remaining and at that point the conference is dead and they'll have to redo a media deal.
Let's say the ACC remnants gets a miserable media distribution of $15 million per school. That would still be over three times what the big east gets currently and about double what it's likely to get in the future.

Just saying.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2015
Messages
21,125
Reaction Score
53,299
Let's say the ACC remnants gets a miserable media distribution of $15 million per school. That would still be over three times what the big east gets currently and about double what it's likely to get in the future.

Just saying.
I don't see who is going to pay them anything north of $10m. The AAC gets $7 and the MWC gets $4
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2024
Messages
363
Reaction Score
1,481
Because there won't be any revenue. At the very best you're looking at Georgia Tech, Wake, BC and Syracuse remaining and at that point the conference is dead and they'll have to redo a media deal.
The ACC isn't gonna die, it's just gonna change and adapt. Did the B12 die when Texas and OU left? No, they adapted and are fine - and those 2 brands are much bigger than FSU/Clemson and make up a much larger part of their football viewership than these two do for the ACC

Whatever revenue we get from a new ACC will still be at least 3-4x as much as the current BE deal
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
5,763
Reaction Score
14,208
Agreed, UConn will only support winners because that's northeast culture. But I also agree with others that the athletic department in the Hathaway era had absolutely no idea what it was doing.
Define winners?
In 6 -7 AAC seasons we won 11 games
The first few years with a 3-2 4 conference wins , not exactly a winning team we were averaging in the high 20K for attendance .
Playing in the hated AAC .
We had 1-2 conference win in the last 3 4 years , that’s not bad that’s pathetic.and attendance fell off the table.
I applaud the brave football fans that stuck with that program . Those guys are special
Even as a middle of the road but competition AAC team averaging 30k was doable . If we were competing for AAC titles you wouldn't be able to get a ticket .
To say our fans only support a winner is hyperbole, Also we have to play Marquis schools is an exaggeration . If we’re playing good exciting football the FBS opponent is irrelevant.
Nobody should have had to endure the second Randy travesty.?
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2015
Messages
21,125
Reaction Score
53,299
The ACC isn't gonna die, it's just gonna change and adapt. Did the B12 die when Texas and OU left? No, they adapted and are fine - and those 2 brands are much bigger than FSU/Clemson and make up a much larger part of their football viewership than these two do for the ACC

Whatever revenue we get from a new ACC will still be at least 3-4x as much as the current BE deal
Delusional. Why are you ignoring what happened to the PAC12?
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
59,339
Reaction Score
221,435
I don't see who is going to pay them anything north of $10m. The AAC gets $7 and the MWC gets $4
I view those two leagues as a floor and not a ceiling. You don't think the predicted ACC remnants have more value than the new ACC which is even more dreadful than the old one? And comparing the remnants to the mountain west conference? Puh-lease.
 
Last edited:

Online statistics

Members online
363
Guests online
1,970
Total visitors
2,333

Forum statistics

Threads
159,583
Messages
4,196,443
Members
10,066
Latest member
bardira


.
Top Bottom