This is such a failure of logic that it's painful.
And you base this inane comment on the fact that you think they are all staying until 2036 because nobody has challenged the GOR.
I suppose there's a chance but good luck with that
This is such a failure of logic that it's painful.
Miami is fools gold. The media continues to love them, which leads to overinflated early rankings. And every year reality sets in : they are a mediocre program with bandwagon-only fans.I'm more surprised that Miami voted yes on this than I am that NC State flipped their vote.
The SEC may have no interest in Miami, but I believe the B1G would jump at the chance to get into recruiting-rich Florida with a newly minted AAU school.
With nil money, Ohio state and Michigan can get a kid from Miami without ever playing them. Saying a school opens up a recruiting base for a school is so 1980.Miami is fools gold. The media continues to love them, which leads to overinflated early rankings. And every year reality sets in : they are a mediocre program with bandwagon-only fans.
Since 2007, they are 1-10 in bowl games.
Uconn had one shot at this. They took Louisville. Since then, nothing matters. What’s crazy is that moving back to the Big East helped us tremendously and killed us at same time. Networks have what they value for pennies on the dollar. No need to move us. I am at the point that I feel fortunate. As a 48 year old, I enjoyed UConn’s dominance and its spectacular ride in my prime. My guess is that in 15 years, UConn athletics are priced out, I am in my 60s and I relive the glory days contently on YouTube. So be it. We got a lifetime of memories in 25 years.anyone think we maybe should have stayed in the AAC? I get the basketball argument but at least we’d have a home for football. Plenty of other schools Tulane, Houston, UCF, Cinci made it work. Now look at them. Honestly maybe the problem was us.
So much has changed since UConn left the AAC that the AAC should be begging any takers to accept a football only deal. It's lost Louisville, Rutgers, UConn, Cincy, Houston, UCF, SMU. It will probably fall behind the Mountain West and the Sun Belt. Maybe even the MAC. It should go after independents Army, UConn, UMass, and perhaps other regional programs like Western Kentucky, Middle Tennesse, App State, Marshall.The aac has already turned down uconn as a football only member…I doubt they would want us now..DB needs to think of a way to get more revenue when our football tv deal expires… I think he might have a plan in place with the rollout of uconn+
Aresco should show vision and balls and grab Mt. Union.ECU, Tulane & Tulsa joined the AAC in 2014, Navy joined the AAC in 2015, and Aresco is only now informally exploring Army. If true, I have clearly given Aresco too much credit in the past.
So much has changed since UConn left the AAC that the AAC should be begging any takers to accept a football only deal. It's lost Louisville, Rutgers, UConn, Cincy, Houston, UCF, SMU. It will probably fall behind the Mountain West and the Sun Belt. Maybe even the MAC. It should go after independents Army, UConn, UMass, and perhaps other regional programs like Western Kentucky, Middle Tennesse, App State, Marshall.
And it's repeated here constantly.With nil money, Ohio state and Michigan can get a kid from Miami without ever playing them. Saying a school opens up a recruiting base for a school is so 1980.
So stop bringing up how a school opens up a recruiting base. No one cares.And it's repeated here constantly.
No.anyone think we maybe should have stayed in the AAC? I
Hold on. When UConn did play rough, half this board, including you, lost your spit.
UConn's problem was geography. BCU convinced the ACC that it owned New England, and Syracuse convinced the ACC that they owned New York. Neither school will ever allow us in the ACC as a result, and that pretty much puts a stake in us with the ACC, which was always the most likely destination.
Leaving the AAC per se was not the problem. We had legitimate travel issues based on.the disappointing contract signed by that conferenceanyone think we maybe should have stayed in the AAC? I get the basketball argument but at least we’d have a home for football. Plenty of other schools Tulane, Houston, UCF, Cinci made it work. Now look at them. Honestly maybe the problem was us.
In no universe was the AAC ever allowing UConn to be football only.However if we were even moderately competitive in that conference we possibly could have left with our dignity intact or even asked to stay as a FB only
.
With nil money, Ohio state and Michigan can get a kid from Miami without ever playing them. Saying a school opens up a recruiting base for a school is so 1980.
Cal has a lot of connections and the opportunity to rub elbows with Cal's academic side makes other university presidents, you know the folks making these decisions, pitch a tent.They're adding one of the worst athletic department in the country when it comes to major sports, they don't care about sports at all, and they're getting an invite because.... they feel bad? Seriously it seems like Cal is getting a spot because people feel bad. It's so weird.
Does NC State flip its vote this morning if they were returning from a stinging loss in E. Hartford? I kid.