- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 21,046
- Reaction Score
- 47,640
Probably means the lawsuit.We never played rough.
You, as per usual, are off the wall.
Probably means the lawsuit.We never played rough.
You, as per usual, are off the wall.
They're welcoming them because it makes it easier for them to leave."I'm just here so I don't get fined" vibes. We're welcoming you because we had to.
E f f ESPNI hate to say it - but that might happen. All depends what is said in the halls and behind closed doors at the ESPN Bowl/CFB industrial complex. We might have to join something as football only to keep post season access.
This move solidified the end of the ACC. UConn's best move right now is to not make a bad knee-jerk move to a G5 conference and stand pat for the remnants of the impending ACC dissolution or pick up a future B12 invite.
It is unconscionable how stupid the ACC is to have added these three against the objections of their three biggest brands.
That tidbit about the 15-team rule is huge to understanding this to be honest. Pittsburgh and Syracuse will now be in a tv contract that makes much more than Kansas and Arizona even if UNC/Clemson/FSU leave.
That’s what I’m terrified of. But that being said, every non P-5 school isn’t giving up their programs. ECU, Tulane etc. aren’t just cutting them. We need figure out the next best non p5 option.
Expect us to make the same pitch this fall to be #18. Will the public hear about it - probably not. Unlike the past, this has been a year of pitching ideas and the pitching will continue.
Pretty sad that’s how far we’ve fallen back to but yes I agree.Our best non-P4 option would be the AAC. Join the AAC (football only) and try to do what Tulane did last year, which in the future would put us in the expanded playoff.
The pitch will be made.....when we join the AAC for football only next spring you'll have your confirmation it is fully dead.The current ACC will never take us. I don’t know why that isn’t abundantly clear to people at this point.
Charlie nice to meet youHere's an idea. Stanford, Cal and SMU need another West Coast school to reduce travel time, say it is SDSU. Let the ACC add SDSU and UConn at the same time. Maybe the B12 will get jealous and there is a war between the two conferences to get UConn/SDSU.
Expect us to make the same pitch this fall to be #18. Will the public hear about it - probably not. Unlike the past, this has been a year of pitching ideas and the pitching will continue.
I don't understand. I am confused.Charlie nice to meet you
I don’t know. But if that 15-team threshold is accurate, Disney could save a lot of money taking the top of the Big XII to the ACC in 2031. No one will be bidding $60+m for the state of Utah at that point.Do you really think Disney would honor that contract if any key members left the ACC?
We acted like we were Rhode Island or New Hampshire for way, way too long and it’s killed us.
I disagree. UConn had national championships in polo, soccer, field hockey in the 70s and 80s. It was in the college world series in the late 70s. We have had many All Americans and some Olympians.Again, with the exception of M/W Basketball, until the late-1990s, UConn was UMass/URI. A Northeast state flagship basketball school with I-AA football. It wasn't until the 1980s that UConn was the strongest football program in its own state - it was Yale.
UConn tried to join the FB club way too late. And they only joined because of the opportunity presented by the Patriots proposal and the Big East offer. UConn didn't even really try - it just fell into their lap. Schools like UNLV, Hawaii, and East Carolina have been playing at the major level for twice as long as UConn.
Its a tough pill to swallow, but that's what's happening. Its not like the school can wave their finger and let 60+ years be forgotten. No one in the current administration has the ability to fix the conference situation with money or marketing; they can only do their best with what they've got to work with.
Also goes by ChuckI don't understand. I am confused.