Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 710 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
21,724
Reaction Score
52,619
Are they allowed to stay the PAC since most of the conference left? And will they still get NCAA credits?

They can have a decent football conference if they pick off the top of the AAC and MWC. It's won't be worth any money but it'll be pretty good football kind of like the early 00s CUSA
The MW exit fee is too high. It’s the whole conference (or 9/12) or none.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
20,588
Reaction Score
44,798
OK it's hilarious that the schools that want to leave are the ones holding other people back from expansion. This happens all the time and it's a joke.
Kind of Washington and Oregon being difficult in PAC negotiations.
 
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
5,043
Reaction Score
19,910
Wow. SMU is really about to be added before Uconn. Horrible football also and terrible in almost all other sports. Not to mention there’s only 10 people that watches them on TV. So why do fans of other school so quick to question Uconn’s accomplishment but no one mentions how terrible SMU is in pretty much all sports?
Supposedly, SMU is asking for no money and they would bring the Dallas/Fort Worth market for the ACC Network which would add ~$36 million to the ACC. If the ACC gets pro-rata for SMU from ESPN and SMU is taking zero, then adding SMU could add a total of ~$60 million to the ACC to be split among the rest of the schools. That is the only reason SMU is being considered.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,349
Reaction Score
5,629
I think they likely have the data that shows Jane Dowe donated $15,000 and has season tickets in Hartford or John Smith has season tickets in Gampel and donated $17,000. No?

As for the the political side, you're right, who knows.
That data they have. They don’t know how much John Smith would give if they only played in Storrs, or how much more a Storrs season ticket holder would donate if they played all their games in Storrs.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2015
Messages
20,708
Reaction Score
49,711
Supposedly, SMU is asking for no money and they would bring the Dallas/Fort Worth market for the ACC Network which would add ~$36 million to the ACC. If the ACC gets pro-rata for SMU from ESPN and SMU is taking zero, then adding SMU could add a total of ~$60 million to the ACC to be split among the rest of the schools. That is the only reason SMU is being considered.
It's wild to me that the ACCN would get picked up in Dallas just because SMU joins the conference. Is this really how the legacy cable deals are working? No wonder cable is dying.

Can't even get the Yankees on Comcast in the valley and SMU is going to get the ACCN added for all of Dallas?
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
765
Reaction Score
1,184
It's wild to me that the ACCN would get picked up in Dallas just because SMU joins the conference. Is this really how the legacy cable deals are working? No wonder cable is dying.

Can't even get the Yankees on Comcast in the valley and SMU is going to get the ACCN added for all of Dallas?
Did you never wonder how Rutgers got into the B10?
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
57,253
Reaction Score
210,236
Trey Wallace key? IDK - but here is story with some numbers.....The yes votes are not done trying to work the no votes.

Hmmm interesting group of opposition. I wonder if this new addition would cause an opening of the contract and would require everyone to sign a GOR expansion.
 
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
5,043
Reaction Score
19,910
Times have changed since Rutgers

There is no way with cable bleeding that they will force full market prices on customers in DFW for SMU and the ACC network

They may carry it, but it will be pennies per month.
ACC Network is probably already in the Dallas/Fort Worth market at an out of market rate (I didn't check) at more than a few pennies per month, say ~$0.35/month. Going to an in market rate could add $1/month.

Remember, the ACC is laser focused on how they can raise revenues in the short term, not on the LT viability of the conference. They are trying to keep FSU and Clemson happy.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
21,724
Reaction Score
52,619
Remember, the ACC is laser focused on how they can raise revenues in the short term, not on the LT viability of the conference. They are trying to keep FSU and Clemson happy.

Odd strategy.
FSU Short-term unhappiness seems irrelevant bc of the GOR. Seminoles are stuck, happy or not.
Longterm happiness is what will determine conference viability.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2018
Messages
6,259
Reaction Score
21,366
Odd strategy.
FSU Short-term unhappiness seems irrelevant bc of the GOR. Seminoles are stuck, happy or not.
Longterm happiness is what will determine conference viability.
13 years is a long time. Wed all take an invite to the acc right now with no guarantee that the conference will exist in its present form in 13 years.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,349
Reaction Score
5,629
Hmmm interesting group of opposition. I wonder if this new addition would cause an opening of the contract and would require everyone to sign a GOR expansion.
Well, if that’s true we know what is going on. Schools that are confident they will leave the ACC when the GOR is up at the latest don’t want to lose their veto power over the conference or their right to choke the conferences growth that they can use for leverage.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
20,588
Reaction Score
44,798
Well, if that’s true we know what is going on. Schools that are confident they will leave the ACC when the GOR is up at the latest don’t want to lose their veto power over the conference or their right to choke the conferences growth that they can use for leverage.
Can't they admit new members and give them no voting powers over things like dissolution of the conference or anything GOR related? Would seem like the easy fix here.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,349
Reaction Score
5,629
Can't they admit new members and give them no voting powers over things like dissolution of the conference or anything GOR related? Would seem like the easy fix here.
Yes, assuming the core 4 is only worried about the future and not trying to get something from the rest of the conference NOW.
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,230
Reaction Score
33,130
Well, if that’s true we know what is going on. Schools that are confident they will leave the ACC when the GOR is up at the latest don’t want to lose their veto power over the conference or their right to choke the conferences growth that they can use for leverage.

Or maybe they are being rational that adding schools just to add schools is a bad strategy in a world where fans will need to care enough about a schedule to proactively subscribe.
 
Joined
Jun 17, 2013
Messages
1,561
Reaction Score
4,187
Disagree. At the time it was taken, there was an argument that, over an extended period of time, it was the second (to PSU) best football program in the Northeast and the best basketball program in the Northeast. Regardless of whether Syracuse “owns” a material TV market, it was a perfectly rational move to extend the ACC’s brand north from Maryland.
I think if the subject expansion had been made 10 years earlier, you are right. By 2011, however, we had just won our 3rd Natty in BB and were beating SU five straight in FB. SU has had 1 BB Natty period and spotty FB performance since then. In sum, there were other forces at work. If the decision was made on performance, support and trajectory, we should have been taken.
 

Online statistics

Members online
369
Guests online
2,585
Total visitors
2,954

Forum statistics

Threads
157,335
Messages
4,094,710
Members
9,985
Latest member
stanfordnyc


Top Bottom