Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 354 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,161
Reaction Score
21,326
Hopefully the next move to be made is the ACC also expanding to 16 schools with Kansas and UCONN. The fear would be they instead choose Kansas and West Virginia.

The ACC needs to be bolder than adding 2 schools. The ACC needs to kill the B12 like they did the Big East.

Adding 5+ teams from the B12 ends the B12 and puts the PAC in a tough spot. Could the ACC go after TTU, Baylor, Kansas, WVU, and Oklahoma State? Could they go 6 and we get in? They need to act boldly and kill the B12.

They don’t want a B12 and PAC merger, then will be the losers. They can‘t place their future in the hands of ND.

I know thats 20, but it helps protect them to some degree from poaching and gives them a chance to survive in 2035. If the end goal is super leagues this is the right move.
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
2,660
Reaction Score
8,735
Ok
Hopefully the next move to be made is the ACC also expanding to 16 schools with Kansas and UCONN. The fear would be they instead choose Kansas and West Virginia.
i would be shocked if the ACC did anything right now. Why expand??? However if they do expand it will be with WVU and Kansas. That is the logical move, and unfortunately for UConn, the smart move. Both schools are signicantly better than UConn at football.
 
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
926
Reaction Score
2,067
The ACC can't be bold because ESPN has already cast its lots with the SEC. They are no longer the hunter, but the hunted.
This sums everything up pretty simply.

ESPN and/or FOX will decide how this shakes out just as they have with every other move that has been made in realignment.

ESPN already has some history in deciding which conferences and schools survive and which ones don't. It's very well known that FOX is all in on college sports and now owns one of the 2 prized whales.

They will determine which of the Little 3 survive just as they will determine which schools currently on the outside get in.

It's always been about the money. Now they just don't try and pretend to hide it.
 
Joined
Aug 4, 2016
Messages
1,116
Reaction Score
1,603
For the Big Ten:

17- Notre Dame
18 - Stanford

Do they stop there? Or keep going?

19 - Oregon
20 - Washington

Keep going?

21 - Cal
22 - Virginia
23 - North Carolina
24 - Duke

For the SEC:

17. Clemson
18. Florida State

19. Oklahoma State
20. Miami

21. NC State
22. Virginia Tech

23. Wake Forest
24. West Virginia
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
5,512
Reaction Score
13,311
A lot of people just waive their hands on the Grant of Rights. If it is so easy to get out of, why can't anyone explain how that happens?
I’m sure the legal genius‘s of the school that want out are going over every inch of that agreement looking for a loophole
Just as the legal Departments on those left behind are building the case for wire it’s ironclad .
This can only be settled in a court of Law
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2013
Messages
8,509
Reaction Score
8,011
Andy Staples (for the Athletic) went back to the source of the ACC GOR, which is the author himself Mark Wilhelm.

Wilhelm is now a corporate attorney with a silk stocking firm Troutman Pepper and broke down the four ways to deal with the GOR.

One was dissolution of the ACC. He did note this was unlikely.

The other three options were walk away (not an option), litigate (incredibly risky), negotiate a buyout (gobs of money).

A good write up if you pay for the Athletic.
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,143
Reaction Score
32,984
I’m sure the legal genius‘s of the school that want out are going over every inch of that agreement looking for a loophole
Just as the legal Departments on those left behind are building the case for wire it’s ironclad .
This can only be settled in a court of Law

It is also fair to assume that the lawyers who drafted the original Grant of Rights knew what they were doing. There are many lawyers who specialize in transactions involving media rights.

I think a lot of people think law works like this:

 
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
4,617
Reaction Score
13,772
You might as well do that now. Because I love saying I told you so.
I will have no problem admitting you are right if they break the GOR but your confidence that it will happen is amazing and you are likely wrong.
The B1G will announce the teams it wants from the ACC in 2034 or 2035.
They are patient and will spend the next 10-12 years assimilating Notre Dame and the Pac12 teams. They are in no rush.
Once proven wrong, all I ask is that you apologize and go one full year without an ounce of bravado in your posts
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,161
Reaction Score
21,326
To the media professionals on here. Is there anything the State of CT could do to remove the ACC and B1G channel from cable in Fairfield County as currently structured? They can’t change the DMA geography but can they control the content and how it is delivered? This is hurting our state school. 1.35M TV sets would be more attractive for streaming.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
87,629
Reaction Score
327,260
Andy Staples (for the Athletic) went back to the source of the ACC GOR, which is the author himself Mark Wilhelm.

Wilhelm is now a corporate attorney with a silk stocking firm Troutman Pepper and broke down the four ways to deal with the GOR.

One was dissolution of the ACC. He did note this was unlikely.

The other three options were walk away (not an option), litigate (incredibly risky), negotiate a buyout (gobs of money).

A good write up if you pay for the Athletic.

Wilhelm was not the author of the GOR:

“When he learned this week that he was one of only a few people in possession of a copy of the ACC’s original grant of rights agreement, Mark Wilhelm took another look at it. He also examined copies of the Big 12 and Pac-12’s agreements, which he obtained around the same time period as a Villanova law student authoring an article on conference grant of rights agreements that would appear in 2014 in the Harvard Law School Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law.”

“The ACC agreement Wilhelm had — which is linked below in this story — is the original grant of rights. He obtained it in 2014 through an open records request to the University of North Carolina while writing that journal article. The agreement he received appears to be the copy that then-UNC chancellor Holden Thorp signed and sent back to the conference. The document contained signature pages for each school’s CEO, which would allow the signed pages to be combined into one fully executed document.”

 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
56,972
Reaction Score
208,814
To the media professionals on here. Is there anything the State of CT could do to remove the ACC and B1G channel from cable in Fairfield County as currently structured? They can’t change the DMA geography but can they control the content and how it is delivered? This is hurting our state school. 1.35M TV sets would be more attractive for streaming.
Every person in Fairfield County has just one TV? I find that hard to believe. If we count their cell phones it’s at least double that number. I have to think 2.7 million TV sets would be even more attractive.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,326
Reaction Score
46,518
Hopefully the next move to be made is the ACC also expanding to 16 schools with Kansas and UCONN. The fear would be they instead choose Kansas and West Virginia.
OK, if you're adding quality schools, but if you lose your marquee schools (Clemson, FSU, UNC, Virginia) and start backfilling with the dregs, your best bet is to just reconstitute the old Big East.

Add Syracuse, BC, WV, Virginia Tech, Pitt, Miami and if you must Duke and Georgia Tech.

I'm not sure where Wake Forest sits in all of this, but it can't be good.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,326
Reaction Score
46,518
The ACC needs to be bolder than adding 2 schools. The ACC needs to kill the B12 like they did the Big East.

Adding 5+ teams from the B12 ends the B12 and puts the PAC in a tough spot. Could the ACC go after TTU, Baylor, Kansas, WVU, and Oklahoma State? Could they go 6 and we get in? They need to act boldly and kill the B12.

They don’t want a B12 and PAC merger, then will be the losers. They can‘t place their future in the hands of ND.

I know thats 20, but it helps protect them to some degree from poaching and gives them a chance to survive in 2035. If the end goal is super leagues this is the right move.
The problem here is that those B12 schools dilute the earnings so much that ACC schools of all ranks start looking for better situations.

For instance, do Pitt, BC and Syracuse really stay in a conference if everyone of true value leaves and they're left with TCU and Baylor and Kansas State?

They're better off in the Big East.

Remember, 20 years ago, the BE was already set to receive about $13m a year from ESPN.

An easy argument could be made that a BE football conference would be easily worth as much as an ACC with only NC State, Virginia Tech, Georgia Tech and Duke left.

Both would be worth more than the dregs of the B12.
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2013
Messages
1,994
Reaction Score
7,875
OK, if you're adding quality schools, but if you lose your marquee schools (Clemson, FSU, UNC, Virginia) and start backfilling with the dregs, your best bet is to just reconstitute the old Big East.

Add Syracuse, BC, WV, Virginia Tech, Pitt, Miami and if you must Duke and Georgia Tech.

I'm not sure where Wake Forest sits in all of this, but it can't be good.
As a Wake Forest parent I have come to root for them (except when they play UConn of course). They have the smallest enrollment of any P5 institution. This is not good for them.
 

FfldCntyFan

Texas: Property of UConn Men's Basketball program
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
12,279
Reaction Score
41,911
To the media professionals on here. Is there anything the State of CT could do to remove the ACC and B1G channel from cable in Fairfield County as currently structured? They can’t change the DMA geography but can they control the content and how it is delivered? This is hurting our state school. 1.35M TV sets would be more attractive for streaming.
For the record (I've lived in Stamford for the entirety of the Big Ten and ACC networks and have had Cablevision/Optimum for all of that time) neither channel is on basic or first tier sports (additional ESPN's, Yes, SNY, CBS & Fox Sports access) packages.

I believe that there was a requirement that in all states (this was a huge reason for Rutgers with New Jersey) that had a Big Tem member, the BTN had to be offered on the basic package, but once the first run expired (I believe approx four years ago) carriers were allowed to move it to a pay level.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2016
Messages
1,986
Reaction Score
4,128
I can't believe that Clemson and some other of the ACC schools found a loophole in the GOR agreement before signing it. They knew this current situation might arise before the mid 2030s. There has got to be a less painful way out. I still think some of the Tobacco Road schools will remain in the ACC. Maybe Duke, UVA, Wake Forest, and perhaps NC.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
20,539
Reaction Score
44,606
SO ND is only 2.5 football games + other sports which is where the range of 125-175 million buyout comes from. NBC is our largest right holder.
Still a crazy amount but more palatable than 400 million.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
430
Reaction Score
1,679
The ACC needs to be bolder than adding 2 schools. The ACC needs to kill the B12 like they did the Big East.

Adding 5+ teams from the B12 ends the B12 and puts the PAC in a tough spot. Could the ACC go after TTU, Baylor, Kansas, WVU, and Oklahoma State? Could they go 6 and we get in? They need to act boldly and kill the B12.

They don’t want a B12 and PAC merger, then will be the losers. They can‘t place their future in the hands of ND.

I know thats 20, but it helps protect them to some degree from poaching and gives them a chance to survive in 2035. If the end goal is super leagues this is the right move.
This scenario is the best I’ve seen thrown out there. With UCONN added with those 5 that makes a very strong conference. Not quite up there with B1G or SEC but winning on the field could change that.
It clearly would be way above anything the PAC, B12, and AAC could throw together.
 

Online statistics

Members online
744
Guests online
4,594
Total visitors
5,338

Forum statistics

Threads
157,022
Messages
4,077,412
Members
9,967
Latest member
UChuskman


Top Bottom