To think Karaban might stick around for four years sounds yummy.We look so much better when he’s on the floor. Very “old” freshman; redshirting with a veteran team last year and playing against the best high school competition. High IQ player.
Geez, please change the title of the thread.
As a rabid Karaban fan, it annoys me to have him get lesser stats than he earns on the court. Not sure I understand why the box scores for the BU game are different at CBS website vs Huskies website, and which stats will be 'official' for Karaban's career. I would have thought there would be 1 source for this stuff. In the post game presser Hurley read Karaban's line and said 2 RBs and that we need more than that from him on the boards. The CBS website says 2 RBs. The Huskies website says 2 offensive and 2 defensive rebounds for a total of 4. Both websites say 4 assists. The highlight clip posted in another thread clearly has 5 assists highlighted. Rewatching the game there were 3 offensive and a defensive rebound = 4 RB.
first Half
@14:13 Offensive Rebound Karaban put back for 2 and was fouled
@12:35 Offensive Rebound with assist pass underneath to Clingan for a jam
second half
@19:27 Entry assist to Sanogo
@16:19 Defensive RB
@12:45 Assist to Sanogo
@ 6:46 Assist to Sanogo
@ 5:35 Offensive Rebound assist to Newton for a 3
I’m pretty sure they missed a Sanogo rebound tooDefinitely odd that there’s this much disparity in one game’s stats.
I think our foul shooting will be fine, and probably better than fine. Here is how our current players are shooting, compared to last year:6 of 9 FT's is higher than the team average - which is barely over 60%. Any many of those made free throws rattled around and fell thru.
They just don't look smooth and confident at the line. Hope it turns around. UCONN's 2014 run was at least in part due to the fact that they were near perfect at the line in crunch time. In that run John Calipari was asked why he didn't foul when trailing by a few points late in the game - "because they never miss"
Nothing like an ultra-small 2-game sample to get fans riled up about something that will likely be a non-issue.I think our foul shooting will be fine, and probably better than fine. Here is how our current players are shooting, compared to last year:
Newton: 10-14 (71.4%), 87.9% last year
Diarra: 3-8 (37.5%), 73.0% last year
Calcaterra: 2-4 (50%), 86.8% last year
Alleyne: 0-0 (!), 85.2% last year, I like him, he’s just taking 3 and D a bit too literally
Sanogo: 4-6 (66.7%), 68.6% last year
Karaban: 6-9 (66.7%), reputation and eye test say he’ll exceed this
Clingan: 5-8 (62.5%), form looks fine
Injured guys:
Hawkins: 82.1% last year
Jackson: 71.4% last year
After looking at that, I think free throw shooting will be a strength of ours. Sanago and Clingan in the 60s would bring the team percentage down a bit because they’ll be at the line so often. In terms of late-game situations, I’ll feel great about most of our guards being at the line.
Wasn't that the point of @ToolzieFan's post?Nothing like an ultra-small 2-game sample to get fans riled up about something that will likely be a non-issue.
And he does that without turning the ball over. Sometimes when you make really quick decisions like that you do something that leads to a turnover. Karaban has a good sense of what he is going to do with the ball before it gets to him.The other thing I have liked so far is Karaban doesn't hold the ball when he gets the ball at the high post or FT line. He catches and knows where to move it to next which keeps the defense off balance and out of position. He is the proverbial SU 2-3 zone killer you want.
One AK pass that caught my attention the other night was to DC .. AK was on the left baseline extended and DC with a mismatch on the right side of the baseline. Two things impressed me.. The speed and vision of AK to see/make the play.. And DC's ability to catch a fairly quick pass and convert with a dunk.. They have a nice rapport on the court and it will pay dividends while they are in Storrs.And he does that without turning the ball over. Sometimes when you make really quick decisions like that you do something that leads to a turnover. Karaban has a good sense of what he is going to do with the ball before it gets to him.
I have to imagine him being here an extra 6 months, basically half a red shirt year, has helped him be very familiar with the offense relative to the new guys and transfers.Agree with the above especially with his anticipation both on the offensive and defensive end.
He has big time basketball high IQ, and game experience will only magnify his skillset.
Yes, he is. Had offers from Harvard and Stanford. To this day I'm surprised he didn't go to Stanford. His parents are very much about education and I figured the combination of academics and athletics at Stanford were too much to ignore. But in the end the family thought it was more important to be closer to home.I’m sure he’s a bright kid too
Pretty sure it came down to us, Penn St, and Northwestern.Yes, he is. Had offers from Harvard and Stanford. To this day I'm surprised he didn't go to Stanford. His parents are very much about education and I figured the combination of academics and athletics at Stanford were too much to ignore. But in the end the family thought it was more important to be closer to home.
Don't remember. Forgot he had an offer from Northwestern also. And Notre Dame too.Pretty sure it came down to us, Penn St, and Northwestern.
This is from an article when he committed to UConn. But I think you're right since he took officials to Penn St. and Northwestern. If I see him again I'll ask why he committed to UConn, even though he's said in interviews why a few times. Maybe he'll tell me more. He lives like a mile from my house but now that he's at UConn he won't be home very often.Pretty sure it came down to us, Penn St, and Northwestern.
Stanford is a great school but he's a basketball player and their basketball program pretty much sucks. He chose UConn over them and every other school who recruited him because UConn is the best basketball school.Yes, he is. Had offers from Harvard and Stanford. To this day I'm surprised he didn't go to Stanford. His parents are very much about education and I figured the combination of academics and athletics at Stanford were too much to ignore. But in the end the family thought it was more important to be closer to home.
Their coach is also on the hot seat. He recruits but doesn’t win, Pejas son will probably be back on the market after the season.Stanford is a great school but he's a basketball player and their basketball program pretty much sucks. He chose UConn over them and every other school who recruited him because UConn is the best basketball school.
Stanford is a great school but he's a basketball player and their basketball program pretty much sucks. He chose UConn over them and every other school who recruited him because UConn is the best basketball school.
I cannot like this enough. The nose-picker will be digging deep...The other thing I have liked so far is Karaban doesn't hold the ball when he gets the ball at the high post or FT line. He catches and knows where to move it to next which keeps the defense off balance and out of position. He is the proverbial SU 2-3 zone killer you want.
I believe that he is gonna be a special Husky player by the time he is done here.Two games. Small sample size.
Karaban passing from top of the key to Sanogo and Clingan and passing from the FT line to the post or the wing.
Spot on.
Great timing, touch, angle, loft, etc.
His feel for the game and ability to find soft spot of the defense has been real good so far.
Stanford has been recruiting really well in the past few years. Curious what’s going on with thatHis earning potential is much higher at the best basketball program. Yeah he could go to Stanford and get a degree and make pretty solid money... but the chances of making 10s of millions is low. It is MUCH higher if he goes to the best basketball school that get him in the league.
Several times now.Yeah, this scared the hell out of me for the briefest of moments
poor man's larry bird.Rich man's Giffey, Henefeld
Wait. What are you basing that on? Because AK, whose game I absolutely love, has played exactly TWO college basketball games. Henefeld shot 38% on threes and 48% overall in his one season. While Karaban could certainly best those percentages, we have no idea at this point if he is a better shooter than Nadav was.I think Karaban is a better shooter than Henefeld was.
Stanford has been recruiting really well in the past few years. Curious what’s going on with that