- Joined
- Dec 25, 2011
- Messages
- 7,181
- Reaction Score
- 8,747
Got caught? You mean got caught... by a rule change, that was applied retroactively, for which we had already been punished, and in order to do so they refused to consider our current APR which would have shown we were in compliance.
That's ex post facto, double jeopardy, and maybe a little Brady violation all rolled into one.
Brady has the tuck rule, this is Emmert's Rule...