Maybe she just saw herself stuck behind Walker and Williams for 2 or 3 years. And maybe (????) Jones. Seems like she could have gotten better coaching/improvement at a few schools other than Tennessee. But maybe she sees herself as the person who brings them back to their glory days. Lots of maybes, who knows. Best of luck to her.
My guess is that one of the reasons Jordan Horston did not pick UConn is that she knows Haley Jones is coming aboard. Their skill sets overlap substantiality.
At UConn, Horston would be stuck behind Williams at the 2, and perhaps (my mouth to God's ears) Bueckers as well after next year. Plus, I think that these days her game is better suited to the 3.
I figured it would be easier to respond to
@Ralph and
@Crossover in one post.
Jordan Horston is an ultra-athletic combo-guard, who, at 6-1, has great handles (though better in transition and with an up-tempo pace than in the halfcourt sets right now). She has an explosive first step and is truly a "pogo stick" leaper. At the 2018 U17 FIBA Women's World Cup, she averaged over 10.1 points, 7.0 rebounds, 5.1 assists, and 3.1 steals for her 7 games (while shooting 57.1 percent from the floor). Notably, her A/TO ratio was 5.1-to-1.0.
Megan Walker is a 6-1 wing who can switch between the two and the three because of her strength, her ability to finish with either hand, and her three-point shooting capabilities (with the "savant skill" - to use one of Rob Clough terms - of a tremendous wingspan).
Christyn Williams is a 5-11 left-handed off-guard. She is a "power guard" - explosive to the rim with a quick first step and great leaping abilities, but is also effective in the mid-range and quite adept at getting hot from three (as she did in the MCDAA game). She is also a great rebounder for her size.
Finally, Haley Jones is a 6-2 forward who can manufacture points outside the point (and is a perimeter threat), but also has really good interior footwork. She is a skilled big forward with versatility in the frontcourt.
TRANSLATION: You could play all four of these players together, with Olivia Nelson-Ododa in the middle. That lineup would be 6-1/5-11/6-1/6-2/6-4. Now, some may argue that is not enough size. But the perimeter size would be unparalleled in women's basketball. And Geno has won titles with 5-9/6-0/6-2/6-2/6-2 (Bird/Taurasi/Cash/Jones/Williams), to use an example. The respective skillsets of Horston/Walker/Williams/Jones/ONO would complement each other very well.
If you reach back in time (and have recruiting services subscriptions), you will read the following evaluation about a player:
Agile, versatile perimeter performer handles and passes in transition; triple-threat creator manufactures and attacks; pro-frame slashes, finishes in traffic, scores vs. contact; court awareness .
This player was Kia Nurse.
Geno Auriemma could have easily make Jordan Horston his primary/secondary playmaker of the future, as he did with Nurse. With Crystal Dangerfield being a senior when Horston will be a freshman, there would only have been one crossover year before Horston could have taken the reins as the primary playmaker (or served as a secondary playmaker if a true PG was recruited in 2020).
Look at what Horston did in a structured system at the 2018 FIBA U17 Women's Basketball World Cup - 10.1 ppg, 7.0 rpg, 5.1 apg, 3.4 spg, while shooting 57.1 percent from the floor and having an A/TO of 5.1-to-1.0. This was much more of a structured system than high school or AAU basketball (not as much as college will be, but still). But look who was coaching Horston at the FIBA U17s -
Carla Berube. Surely Coach Berube knows Geno's system, how to maximize talents in terms of shooting/passing/rebounding, how to mold an athletic, uber-talented passer into a primary playmaker, etc.
Which video were you watching? Since when does being FIBA U17 MVP NOT qualify as UCONN material?
I agree,
@CocoHusky .
See my above comments for supplemental analysis to your post (and the video you posted).