- Joined
- Sep 16, 2011
- Messages
- 50,371
- Reaction Score
- 177,588
Gonna have to make some room for him.Yes.
Gonna have to make some room for him.Yes.
i think the guys who hurley might suggest to look elsewhere because they might not play.... know that if they stay, they will play. for no reason other than lack of options.
i mean carlton/akok aren’t playing 40 minutes each and someone will need to play in the frontcourt. doesn’t look like kofi is walking through that door..Only if there are injuries. If everyone is healthy, the roster is likely to go 10 deep with any kind of significant minutes.
This is basically the conversion you have with these kids and 90% of them get it. And reality is - there’s maybe 2/3 guys you’ll have that conversation with assuming you have to to begin with.
But you need to be careful about how you go about it. These kids are always wary of people trying to snack on them. Everyone’s your best friend when you’re winning and when you’re not they want to throw you in the trash. For some of these kids and teams, it’s a bad message to send that they better look fantastic in a year or two or Coach is gonna run me outta town... Pretty awful way to treat people, never mind kids. And really hard to get buy into any kind of creed of love, brotherhood, culture, etc. While it’d be great that they just get it, most wont.
“That guy doesn’t care about you, he just cares about himself and winning” is a fast way to getting no one ever.
If he's not good enough, then yes. It sucks but you don't win games being niceSome of y’all are not even arguing the same point. You can meet with the player, tell them it’s unlikely they get real minutes, and then what? If the guy decides he wants to stay and fight for minutes... what do you do? Some of you are comfortable kicking off a guy like that? One who is a good teammate, competes, pulls his weight academically? It’s not the player’s fault someone messed up his recruitment. Building a program takes some time, and you can do some damage with what looks like a quick fix. That being said, this is all a philosophical discussion because next year’s roster isn’t set yet.
If he's not good enough, then yes. It sucks but you don't win games being nice
Agreed on doing right by the kids, we just clearly disagree on what that entailsIt’s not about being nice. It’s about doing right by a group of 18-22 year old non-professionals. We clearly disagree on this subject.
The emphasis is that they are non-professionals.It’s not about being nice. It’s about doing right by a group of 18-22 year old non-professionals. We clearly disagree on this subject.
Case in point: Kwintin Williams mysteriously disappearing from the team about a month into the season.
Agreed on doing right by the kids, we just clearly disagree on what that entails
I'm not saying you just walk in and pull a scholarship, I'm just saying I don't need a sunshine and happiness approach when going into these meetings. Kid wants to stay then you make it VERY clear why that's not in his best interest. You call it a scumbag move, maybe. But that's lifeHow is it possibly doing right by the kid by revoking his scholarship when he wants to stay? At least @UCDaveD is completely transparent. It seems like most people are on the same page here. You tell the kid minutes will be hard to come by or that the program is looking for a different style of player or whatever to make the kid understand his best basketball future is elsewhere. If he loves the school and doesn't want to leave, you don't pull the scholarship unless you are a scum bag. You can give the kid a very tight leash and if he is a bad teammate, go ahead and KW him but if they are doing everything right off the court, they deserve their scholarship.
I'm not saying you just walk in and pull a scholarship, I'm just saying I don't need a sunshine and happiness approach when going into these meetings. Kid wants to stay then you make it VERY clear why that's not in his best interest. You call it a scumbag move, maybe. But that's life
“You KW him”.... pretty unfair statement if we’ve never found out what really happenedHow is it possibly doing right by the kid by revoking his scholarship when he wants to stay? At least @UCDaveD is completely transparent. It seems like most people are on the same page here. You tell the kid minutes will be hard to come by or that the program is looking for a different style of player or whatever to make the kid understand his best basketball future is elsewhere. If he loves the school and doesn't want to leave, you don't pull the scholarship unless you are a scum bag. You can give the kid a very tight leash and if he is a bad teammate, go ahead and KW him but if they are doing everything right off the court, they deserve their scholarship.
Yeah I don't think I'm that far off from everyone else, just maybe give a little more pushback if they do want to stayWell then it seems like you have the same take as basically everyone else. No one thinks it's a scum bag move for Hurley to clearly explain to a player why his best basketball move is to go elsewhere.
“You KW him”.... pretty unfair statement if we’ve never found out what really happened
There is a commitment on a year to year basis, none of these are Hurley's recruits and he owes them nothing. Nothing Hurley wants to do is a quick fix, he's trying to build the program back up and by doing that you tell kids who aren't good enough or healthy enough to move somewhere better for them and bring in better talent to replace them.
Hurley's job is to win basketball games.
You're wrong, scholarships are on a year to year basis.A scholarship is not a year to year commitment, and Hurley did recruit the players because when he got hired the first thing he did was reach out and meet all the players and told them he wanted them all to stay.
He made a commitment to them. It’s clear from Hurley’s past that pushing players out is not his style.
You are just itching for transfers because for the past few months you have been stating that there will be several transfers, and to date there has been none.
You really just need to shut up about transfers for a while,
There would never be bench warmers!!! Your son going to another program will in turn make someone else's son have less playing time in that program. That other son will transfer to another program and then someone else's son...
You're wrong, scholarships are on a year to year basis.
I'm itching for us to be good again. Players taking up scholarships to be cheerleaders doesn't make us good, it hurts us terribly. Hurley knows that and wants to upgrade the talent.
We're not winning games because we don't have much talent. Every coach does this, you help the kid find another program that fits his talent level. If a kid doesn't have basketball in his future because of injury you find another way he can get his diploma free of charge. You don't sacrifice your ability to win games by wasting schollies.It doesn’t look good at all, to any players whether they’re current players or potential recruits. It could potentially backfire hard to get that reputation of not caring for the kids on your team, even if you didn’t recruit them.
And I think it’d be especially damaging given where uconn is right now. We’re not winning games, so gotta sell recruits on that legacy of uconn basketball and it’s reputation.