Who is saying they did something wrong? This could be the pettiness of St. Johns and the NCAA is now forced to look into things. Its possible they come back and find nothing. I don't see how it could be anyone else. This is a head scratcher.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but just to be clear - what we're implying is that UConn (administration), either implicitly or explicitly, saw a train coming down the track straight for KO and instead of trying to push him off the tracks, they tied him down. Cool cool. Yep, that's definitely going to attract talent on the court and in the head coaching office.
A win at home vs a depleted SMU is hardly going to move the needle. It was a great win for us following closely, but lets not make it out to be more than it is.
No one is making it more than that. I don’t think anyone on this board expected a win here with our depleted team at home or expected these guys to actually play as well as they did as a team starting 3 Freshmen. To the contrary folks expected a loss, maybe even an ugly loss at that. This is the best win of the season because of where expectations were for this game especially missing Larrier.
Agreed. And while people continue to use talent and experience as an excuse for this season, they conveniently forget that we were just as bad last year even though we had quite a bit of talent and experience. Of course, there is always a weakazzed response and it ususally has something to do with not enough ballhandlers. We had plenty of ball handlers last year. You don't need Pete Maravich to beat Houston.
Exactly UConn leaked this
Hold on, after 3-4 times in a row THEN you let the 8-yr old win?!
I don't know how this process works. It seems like we are assuming guilt. Could it be that when St. Johns refused to comply, the NCAA is forced to do its due diligence? Am I naive to believe that its still possible that nothing comes of this?
