I don't understand your point. You should see him as a poor version of Vital if anything. That's why he's being recruited by the MAAC and America East instead of the MWC and AAC. The point is not whether we should be recruiting Hunter to come here as a scholarship player. The only point anyone has been making is, especially in a year when we're only going to have 12 scholarships and there are question marks about our depth at the point with our #1 having an injury history, wouldn't it be really nice to have a low D-1 player as a walk on to provide depth and alternatives. To which the answer is almost certainly yes.