He was pretty good, but I've never heard anyone long for the good ole days of Travis Knight. He was our center when we were nicknamed the donut team.
We were 33-3 in the Big East his junior and senior seasons, during which he was the third most important player on the team. We have certainly had better and more successful centers since then, and if we long for anything we should long for the days of Emeka, but if we "only" end up with another Travis, we will be sitting pretty.
I just know if we had to go get a rebound,and I could take one guy, I'd take Okafor first - then probably Adrien, Knight 2-3...
This is totally fair, and I think I agree with your order in spite of what the stats say.
Not saying that it was a good contract (it wasn't), but Travis could have been a better player no? I felt that he kind of became the proverbial 'fat and lazy' around that time. Might just be my impression.
That is the rumor, and I haven't seen a lot to dispute it.
Nonetheless, it bothers me that Travis, Doron, Kirk King and a few others from that era aren't remembered as fondly as they should be. It's the price they pay for not winning a title (they would have in '96 if Ricky hadn't gotten hurt; we all know that), but that was a goshdarn fun team to watch.
Anyway, this has gotten pretty far afield. Obviously it means that Josh Sharma is, in fact, the next Travis Knight and he's coming to UConn.