Is University of New Haven Going To Go FCS? | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Is University of New Haven Going To Go FCS?

What's more expensive to run, FCS football or D1 lacrosse? not sure what Central's priorities are regarding athletics and alumni sentiment, but I would think dropping football and redirecting that spending to something like lacrosse or soccer or whatever would better serve the school.
 
What's more expensive to run, FCS football or D1 lacrosse? not sure what Central's priorities are regarding athletics and alumni sentiment, but I would think dropping football and redirecting that spending to something like lacrosse or soccer or whatever would better serve the school.
Why don't you mind yourself

Edit: I talked to a uconn Dean. He has the same take on uconn football
 
Matt Brown (of Extra Points) put out an article last week stating SEVERAL northeastern Division 1 institutions are seriously considering dropping down in the next couple weeks. Don't be stunned if it is a school you know.
And yet we’ve seen many move up too.

It wasnt that long ago that D1 was 330 schools. Now it’s 350+
 
And yet we’ve seen many move up too.

It wasnt that long ago that D1 was 330 schools. Now it’s 350+
Merrimack just took the house deal. Merrimack. Where they are coming up with magic money i don't know
 
What's more expensive to run, FCS football or D1 lacrosse?
Even at Central’s level of FCS, they likely have more scholarship athletes, coaches, etc than a lax team would require. Additionally, fewer FCS football scholarships likely equals fewer Title IX coed scholarships.

Unclear when, but wasn’t Central football D2 a few decades ago? Similar to comparable size, D2 Southern.
 
Even at Central’s level of FCS, they likely have more scholarship athletes, coaches, etc than a lax team would require. Additionally, fewer FCS football scholarships likely equals fewer Title IX coed scholarships.

Unclear when, but wasn’t Central football D2 a few decades ago? Similar to comparable size, D2 Southern.
'92-93 went from D2 independent to D1 AA.

Edit to add that CCSU has about 500 more students. Both schools are 9-10k total enrollment.
 
I believe that was also primarily in response to then NCAA bylaw that was passed that prevented schools who were classified to Division 1 from participating in a lower division for football. That rule saw a number of schools (28 of them) who were D2 or D3 forced into D1. The Pioneer League was formed as a result of the rule change (and the MAAC started sponsoring football).
 
'92-93 went from D2 independent to D1 AA.

Edit to add that CCSU has about 500 more students. Both schools are 9-10k total enrollment.
“D1 AA”…. Man, I haven’t heard that in a long time. Unlocked some old memories haha
 
What years did Northeastern- Bost U. and Hofstra drop football. Did they ever consider restart at D2 -D3 ? Ever any interest for Vermont to get back in the game ?
College FB in the Northeast is hanging on by a thread.
 
What years did Northeastern- Bost U. and Hofstra drop football. Did they ever consider restart at D2 -D3 ? Ever any interest for Vermont to get back in the game ?
College FB in the Northeast is hanging on by a thread.
If a school is in D-1 they cannot compete at a lower level in any sport.

BU cancelled before the 1998 season, kind of late in comparison to when schools would normally announce something like that, which is why we ended up playing (and beating) eventual national champion UMass twice that year.

I'm pretty sure that Northeastern dropped football before BU did but not sure as to exactly when. Hofstra held on quite a few years longer, untill about fifteen years ago.

The northeast (eastern NY, New England) reaaly won't support too many teams so adding won't do a whole lot to help matters.
 
If a school is in D-1 they cannot compete at a lower level in any sport.

BU cancelled before the 1998 season, kind of late in comparison to when schools would normally announce something like that, which is why we ended up playing (and beating) eventual national champion UMass twice that year.

I'm pretty sure that Northeastern dropped football before BU did but not sure as to exactly when. Hofstra held on quite a few years longer, untill about fifteen years ago.

The northeast (eastern NY, New England) reaaly won't support too many teams so adding won't do a whole lot to help matters.

Northeastern dropped football in 2009. They were in the A-10 and then the CAA. BU ended it in the late '90s.
 
What years did Northeastern- Bost U. and Hofstra drop football. Did they ever consider restart at D2 -D3 ? Ever any interest for Vermont to get back in the game ?
College FB in the Northeast is hanging on by a thread.
And that thread is colored national flag blue.
 
NEC is going to be in trouble with teams dropping to D3.

Le Moyne and Stonehill recently came up. Mercyhurst and Chicago St. just joined. But dang, there's probably been 30 different schools involved in this league. No one stays for very long. Merrimack is gone, Duquesne and RoMo are football only. Not very stable.

CCSU needs to move to the MAAC or CAA.
 
What's more expensive to run, FCS football or D1 lacrosse? not sure what Central's priorities are regarding athletics and alumni sentiment, but I would think dropping football and redirecting that spending to something like lacrosse or soccer or whatever would better serve the school.
Lacrosse is a sport that does zero for northeastern schools that a not power schools. I’d be more accurate to say aren’t located in Canada. Over and over I read nonsense about how big lacrosse is going to be, then I look at attendance data and it is in the 100s not even the 1000s. I’ve been to Central Footbsll and basketball games. Pretty solid FCS crowd in football. I’d guess 4000. Good crowd, band all around fun experience. Basketball was the same. Not a sellout but solid attendance. And people were into it.

I’m not sure why people think students, alumni or the general public will care about lacrosse or even soccer. The reality is that neither one draw flies nor generate even modest interest. CCSU probably draws more fans to a football game than any of the D1 lacrosse programs in the state do in a season.

As far as dropping down to D3, in part I blame the NCAA rule. I’m not sure why a school ought not play D2 or D3 football and D1 in other sports, or frankly not play D1 football and Basketball and D3 in hockey and lacrosse. UConn did that in hockey for decades. It was fine.

I suspect it will be the smaller private schools that are the biggest wave of teams dropping down. I also wonder if at some point the “elite” privates like the Ivies and the Patriot just say the heck with all of you and form their own entity with their own rules. Princeton will still be Princeton even if it doesn’t play in the NCAA tournament. I could even see a Georgetown being tempted by such an arrangement.
 
Sacred Heart seems to be doing OK with their football program. They just built a 70m hockey arena. Money does not look like much of a problem to them.
 
Lacrosse is a sport that does zero for northeastern schools that a not power schools. I’d be more accurate to say aren’t located in Canada. Over and over I read nonsense about how big lacrosse is going to be, then I look at attendance data and it is in the 100s not even the 1000s. I’ve been to Central Footbsll and basketball games. Pretty solid FCS crowd in football. I’d guess 4000. Good crowd, band all around fun experience. Basketball was the same. Not a sellout but solid attendance. And people were into it.

I’m not sure why people think students, alumni or the general public will care about lacrosse or even soccer. The reality is that neither one draw flies nor generate even modest interest. CCSU probably draws more fans to a football game than any of the D1 lacrosse programs in the state do in a season.

As far as dropping down to D3, in part I blame the NCAA rule. I’m not sure why a school ought not play D2 or D3 football and D1 in other sports, or frankly not play D1 football and Basketball and D3 in hockey and lacrosse. UConn did that in hockey for decades. It was fine.

I suspect it will be the smaller private schools that are the biggest wave of teams dropping down. I also wonder if at some point the “elite” privates like the Ivies and the Patriot just say the heck with all of you and form their own entity with their own rules. Princeton will still be Princeton even if it doesn’t play in the NCAA tournament. I could even see a Georgetown being tempted by such an arrangement.
I think if lacrosse was going to be popular as a spectator sport it would have revealed itself by now. I still haven't quite pinned down which makes me not like it so much. I feel like its very possession heavy and not very dynamic. Further, since the ball often remains in a stick you can't just look up and tell immediately what's going on. Even in hockey you can usually see the puck within a second or two unless its under 2-3 bodies along the boards.
 
Sacred Heart seems to be doing OK with their football program. They just built a 70m hockey arena. Money does not look like much of a problem to them.
Guessing Valentine is a prodigious fund raiser if he is still there.
 
I think if lacrosse was going to be popular as a spectator sport it would have revealed itself by now. I still haven't quite pinned down which makes me not like it so much. I feel like its very possession heavy and not very dynamic. Further, since the ball often remains in a stick you can't just look up and tell immediately what's going on. Even in hockey you can usually see the puck within a second or two unless its under 2-3 bodies along the boards.
Same here with lacrosse, although it's an unpopular opinion. I feel like they run down the field, guys do a bunch of herky-jerky stick moves, shoot, they run down other end. With soccer there is more of a build-up, trying to create space and passing lanes, it's "beautiful." Rugby is always fun to watch.

It's amazing that Soccer Sundays at UConn used to be by far the biggest event on the Storrs campus
 
Same here with lacrosse, although it's an unpopular opinion. I feel like they run down the field, guys do a bunch of herky-jerky stick moves, shoot, they run down other end. With soccer there is more of a build-up, trying to create space and passing lanes, it's "beautiful." Rugby is always fun to watch.

It's amazing that Soccer Sundays at UConn used to be by far the biggest event on the Storrs campus
Before lowell was looking to elevate i had always told them "lacrosse and rugby if the latter ever becomes varsity"

I think football will always keep rugby as a club sport due to the politics. I think rugby could become more popular.
 
Before lowell was looking to elevate i had always told them "lacrosse and rugby if the latter ever becomes varsity"

I think football will always keep rugby as a club sport due to the politics. I think rugby could become more popular.
Rugby needs to play a club sport no matter how popular it becomes. The tradition of the opposing teams getting together after the games and party all night. The NCAA would ruin it.
 
Rugby needs to play a club sport no matter how popular it becomes. The tradition of the opposing teams getting together after the games and party all night. The NCAA would ruin it.
The NCAA would not allow kegs on the sidelines ;)
 

Online statistics

Members online
170
Guests online
1,386
Total visitors
1,556

Forum statistics

Threads
163,970
Messages
4,377,030
Members
10,168
Latest member
CTFan142


.
..
Top Bottom