Hassan Diarra | Page 5 | The Boneyard

Hassan Diarra

Status
Not open for further replies.
If the rotation is set, I’m not nearly as high as you are with the sweet 16 or bust.
Roster and lineup construction is undoubtedly better this year though. Last year’s roster had a pretty hard ceiling, but they had a high floor.
I think this team is probably better. ...Real key is this lineup better fits what Dan wants to do. Should be better for that reason alone.
next year's team will have synergy. no more 10 pts in 10 min starts that we spend all game digging out of.

we are replacing cole with newton, but martin and whaley are being replaced by committee. we are replacing their rebounding and defense with shooting, passing, and ball handling.

of the projected starters we have a good idea of what to expect from newton, alleyne, and sanogo, but AJ and Hawkins in particular are the x-factors. they will dictate our floor/ceiling but given their talent the ceiling is the roof.
 
Last edited:
You need to add another layer of context to the stats and then the real story becomes abundantly clear very quickly.

Jalen scored 131 points last year; 40 of those came in the first four games of the season against very weak competition, and to take that a step further: 56 came in those 4 games + 2 more with MD-ES and Grambling. He also had 24 of his 65 assists in those 6 games.

Against representative competition, we're talking about a sub-.300 FG% with a 3P% of 15 in 27 games. From the start of Big East play on, he shot .286% from the field, .188% from 3 and scored 44 points in 22 games with a 1.3 to 0.7 assist to turnover ratio. That is not a playable high-major player by any standard whatsoever.

You seem stuck on the assist to turnover ratio, but both Jalen's and H. Diarra's are misleading.

Jalen's fatal flaw is an inability to handle high-major ball pressure. To compensate for that, he turned his back to the defender and backed the ball up the court, eating up a large amount of the shot clock. His inability to initiate offense cratered our shot quality and offense efficiency because of the number of times it led to a game of hot potato to get a shot up for whomever ended up with the ball and less than 10 seconds to make something happen when he finally got us into a half-court set.

Diarra, meanwhile, played in a Buzz Williams system that has always led to low assist-to-turnover ratios.

Remember all those great guards he had at Marquette? Vander Blue averaged 1.8 assists to 2.3 turnovers his final year and a 2.0 assists/2.0 turnovers for his career. Darius Johnson-Odom posted a 2.7 assist to 2.4 turnover mark as an All-Big East first teamer in 2011-12. These are future NBA players on Sweet 16/Elite Eight teams. Look up and down last year's A&M roster and it's the same thing. It's the way they play.

Diarra also improved considerably as the season went on last year against high-major competition. I took his final 15 games as what seems like a fair indicator: He shot 434% from the field, .378% from 3 from that point on and as many have mentioned, there's reason in Texas A&M's roster construction change during the season to believe that is not a coincidence.

All this is to say that Jalen 100% did the right thing in leaving UConn for a level where his skillset can flourish without his inability to handle ball pressure destroying his production. And perhaps more importantly, to nip any idea of using a misrepresentation of what Gaffney was to cut down Hassan before he even plays his first game for us.

This is the proper analysis x1000.

I was/am a huge fan of Gaff and desperately wanted him to succeed at UConn. But an objective deep dive into the metrics shows it just wasn’t meant to be. I hope he kicks arse at FAU.

WRT Diarra, all deep-dive analytics and “eye test” signs point towards this being grand theft auto by Hurley & Co. if we can get him to UConn.
 
I just looked at all of the tweets mentioning that he was entering the portal from a few weeks ago...every single A&M fan in the replies were upset that he is leaving. I’ll take that as a good sign that he’s going to be an impact guy for us in whatever role he has here.
 
I just looked at all of the tweets mentioning that he was entering the portal from a few weeks ago...every single A&M fan in the replies were upset that he is leaving. I’ll take that as a good sign that he’s going to be an impact guy for us in whatever role he has here.
I would have that take too.

Fans can be excruciatingly analytical and critical of a player. That they are upset with his leaving, should be a good indicator of his value to A&M.

If he comes here, welcome aboard. If a superior player comes instead, welcome to him. If they both come, welcome to both of them.
 
I just looked at all of the tweets mentioning that he was entering the portal from a few weeks ago...every single A&M fan in the replies were upset that he is leaving. I’ll take that as a good sign that he’s going to be an impact guy for us in whatever role he has here.
From their board, it seems the staff was caught off guard he was leaving.

Source in case anyone wants to get the A&M fan perspective: Diarra Potential Destinations | TexAgs

Edit: some more fan perspective here:
Diarra in the portal | TexAgs
 
Last edited:
I just looked at all of the tweets mentioning that he was entering the portal from a few weeks ago...every single A&M fan in the replies were upset that he is leaving. I’ll take that as a good sign that he’s going to be an impact guy for us in whatever role he has here.
Good stuff. With Q moving on I’d think he was their third best returning player behind Radford and Coleman. If not very close to that. It’s a big loss as he took a ton of big shots for them.

Texas A&M had a ton of great wins down the stretch vs ranked teams and won laughers most of the way to the finals of the NIT before a Nunge prayer did them in. He was a major part of it.
 
.-.
Hassan Diarra's numbers over the last 16 games of the season:

7.9p, 1.9r, 1.9a, 1.7 to, 0.6s, 46 2p%, 36.6 3p%, 81.4 ft% w/ 2.7 ftas in 18 mpg.

Hypothetically, if those were Diarra's numbers at UConn and we didn't also acquire Newton, I'd be pretty excited handing over the PG reins to Diarra. In reality, there's a chance to have Newton and have Diarra? I'd be psyched and pumped. I'll miss Cole for sure, but that's an awesome 1-2 punch.

As a transfer, there isn't that same inherit excitement as a homegrown guy, but those are solid numbers in SEC regular season/playoff games and NIT play where if you remove Alcorn State, they had a good slate (Oregon, Wake Forest, Washington State, Xavier, average KP rating of 53.5).
 
Will his brother be on campus again? Kid must be on his 6 th degree by now
 
Hassan Diarra NIT/SEC Tournament Highlights Scouting Report/Notes. He's #5 on gray in all the clips.

Things I love:
  • For a guy that is 6'2" 180, he will absolutely put a body on a guy on the block when he's switched onto him or boxing him out. (Semi 11:18) He comes in like a bouncer after a drunk guy just spilled a beer on his favorite shirt. It's not just business, it's personal.
  • He gets downhill (Semi 11:43) - Seems like he can get into the paint against high major defense. In this clip uses his body well to shield and draw the foul.
  • Can even go coast-to-coast (Semi 2:05, Final 5:31) - Big Vital-esque rebound and then strong gather finish. He's an okay rim finisher for his size, but he's clearly not Bouknight or anything (stats put him around Martin, which is good for him and bad for Martin with size difference). Goes into "attack mode" at times after making a shot or two.
  • Really likes to drive and dump-off (Semi 10:24). Sanogo gonna feast on short floaters/dunks. Nice change of pace to get by the big as well.
  • He doesn't have tunnel vision when driving (Semi 11:42) - Broken play, finds a seam and kicks out for open look/extra pass.
  • Keeps his head up in transition (Semi 16:16) - He's certainly not a pure point, but he can find guys on occasion.
  • He's got hops and moxie (Semi 12:43) - Not his man, but he rotates all the way back and really makes a go about it. Announcer talking about the guy catching a body, I'm just impressed a 6'2 guy almost blocked a 6'10 guy at the top of his dunk from behind.
  • Good weak-side positional helper. (Final 13:28) - Texas A&M played no-middle scheme and he was good at cheating off and closing off baseline drives, especially at his size.
  • Knows limitations. Uses threat of shot to get into paint. (Final 9:42) - Attacks closeout and pump fakes on 2 separate occasions on one possession. Leads to assist.
  • Defensive versatility (Final 9:16) - Had a lot of practice guarding and switching all over thanks to A&M's scheme. At 6'2", fronts Nunge in textbook manner in this clip.
  • When decisive and in rhythm, can make shots (Final 7:20) - Seems like to like this pull-up from top of the key when defense goes under.
  • This isn't the normal outcome for this move from him. (Final 4:03) - But it sure looked good. He was a big part of A&M's run in this game (from 15-6 X to 31-26 A&M.
  • He can use his strength and hops to finish over help defenders (Final 11:03) - Should only get stronger and better at finishing over the next couple of years.
  • Diarra was playing crunch time during the NIT finals mostly for his defense.
Things I didn't like as much:
  • Shot selection / decision making (Semis 14:33) - I don't know what this is, but this is not going down at UConn. Pull-up long 2 with a teammate completely wide open for 3 on the wing.
  • Sometimes he tries to go coast to coast, but with bad decision making (SEC F 15:57). Have to back out a 1 v 3.
  • Not big or long enough for top of a zone (SEC F 7:11) - A&M put him up top, and I like his hands up energy and stance, but they just passed right around him. There's a reason Boeheim puts 6'6" long, former volleyball players at the top.
  • He's not enough of a shooting threat and A&M sometimes just parked him as a decoy in the corners or wings for full possessions. (SEC F 6:43) - His man is able to sag off and draw a charge in the paint. The driver should have kicked out, but clearly not a high priority kick-out either.
  • Can miss badly on shots (SEC F 2:05) - Shooting is obviously not his strength and he has a pretty high arcing shot, and when the trajectory is a bit off, who knows where it'll go.
  • Will be at a quickness disadvantage at times (SEC F 5:24) - He draws a foul on this play using his strength, but his man falls down and he barely takes advantage. On some possessions he looks like he has pretty heavy feet.
  • Needs some work on pick and roll reads. (Final 3:20) - Wide open roll man, but overreacts to the stunting defender who recovers and picks his pass.
  • Being in attack mode is good, but sometimes bites off more than he can chew. (Final 2:02) - Just not skilled or big enough to make this move against a big wing defender that has hung with him.
  • Can sometimes be inaccurate with his passes (Final 16:30) - His man is a little late spotting up, but just not good enough from him.
  • Handle is okay, but probably wouldn't hold up to high pressure defense. (Final 4:33) - Big part of his game will be driving to the basket, so his handle has to be tight. A crossover at the FT line is a tough move in that tight of a space.
 
.-.
He wouldn't be a bad player as the 4th guard, or 5th of you count AJ. I don't know that he would be the answer to be a real piece of the rotation. We seem to be after guards with more of a history of scoring.
Should able to get a decent walk on for 4th or 5th guard
 
In all of this comparison talk, I’m thinking SO Hawkins replaces Martin, not Nah.

Newton replaces Cole
Nah replaces Polley
Diarra replaces Gaffney
 
Hassan Diarra NIT/SEC Tournament Highlights Scouting Report/Notes. He's #5 on gray in all the clips.

Things I love:
  • For a guy that is 6'2" 180, he will absolutely put a body on a guy on the block when he's switched onto him or boxing him out. (Semi 11:18) He comes in like a bouncer after a drunk guy just spilled a beer on his favorite shirt. It's not just business, it's personal.
  • He gets downhill (Semi 11:43) - Seems like he can get into the paint against high major defense. In this clip uses his body well to shield and draw the foul.
  • Can even go coast-to-coast (Semi 2:05, Final 5:31) - Big Vital-esque rebound and then strong gather finish. He's an okay rim finisher for his size, but he's clearly not Bouknight or anything (stats put him around Martin, which is good for him and bad for Martin with size difference). Goes into "attack mode" at times after making a shot or two.
  • Really likes to drive and dump-off (Semi 10:24). Sanogo gonna feast on short floaters/dunks. Nice change of pace to get by the big as well.
  • He doesn't have tunnel vision when driving (Semi 11:42) - Broken play, finds a seam and kicks out for open look/extra pass.
  • Keeps his head up in transition (Semi 16:16) - He's certainly not a pure point, but he can find guys on occasion.
  • He's got hops and moxie (Semi 12:43) - Not his man, but he rotates all the way back and really makes a go about it. Announcer talking about the guy catching a body, I'm just impressed a 6'2 guy almost blocked a 6'10 guy at the top of his dunk from behind.
  • Good weak-side positional helper. (Final 13:28) - Texas A&M played no-middle scheme and he was good at cheating off and closing off baseline drives, especially at his size.
  • Knows limitations. Uses threat of shot to get into paint. (Final 9:42) - Attacks closeout and pump fakes on 2 separate occasions on one possession. Leads to assist.
  • Defensive versatility (Final 9:16) - Had a lot of practice guarding and switching all over thanks to A&M's scheme. At 6'2", fronts Nunge in textbook manner in this clip.
  • When decisive and in rhythm, can make shots (Final 7:20) - Seems like to like this pull-up from top of the key when defense goes under.
  • This isn't the normal outcome for this move from him. (Final 4:03) - But it sure looked good. He was a big part of A&M's run in this game (from 15-6 X to 31-26 A&M.
  • He can use his strength and hops to finish over help defenders (Final 11:03) - Should only get stronger and better at finishing over the next couple of years.
  • Diarra was playing crunch time during the NIT finals mostly for his defense.
Things I didn't like as much:
  • Shot selection / decision making (Semis 14:33) - I don't know what this is, but this is not going down at UConn. Pull-up long 2 with a teammate completely wide open for 3 on the wing.
  • Sometimes he tries to go coast to coast, but with bad decision making (SEC F 15:57). Have to back out a 1 v 3.
  • Not big or long enough for top of a zone (SEC F 7:11) - A&M put him up top, and I like his hands up energy and stance, but they just passed right around him. There's a reason Boeheim puts 6'6" long, former volleyball players at the top.
  • He's not enough of a shooting threat and A&M sometimes just parked him as a decoy in the corners or wings for full possessions. (SEC F 6:43) - His man is able to sag off and draw a charge in the paint. The driver should have kicked out, but clearly not a high priority kick-out either.
  • Can miss badly on shots (SEC F 2:05) - Shooting is obviously not his strength and he has a pretty high arcing shot, and when the trajectory is a bit off, who knows where it'll go.
  • Will be at a quickness disadvantage at times (SEC F 5:24) - He draws a foul on this play using his strength, but his man falls down and he barely takes advantage. On some possessions he looks like he has pretty heavy feet.
  • Needs some work on pick and roll reads. (Final 3:20) - Wide open roll man, but overreacts to the stunting defender who recovers and picks his pass.
  • Being in attack mode is good, but sometimes bites off more than he can chew. (Final 2:02) - Just not skilled or big enough to make this move against a big wing defender that has hung with him.
  • Can sometimes be inaccurate with his passes (Final 16:30) - His man is a little late spotting up, but just not good enough from him.
  • Handle is okay, but probably wouldn't hold up to high pressure defense. (Final 4:33) - Big part of his game will be driving to the basket, so his handle has to be tight. A crossover at the FT line is a tough move in that tight of a space.

If, after watching these clips that @auror put together, you aren't excited if this kid comes to UConn to be a 10-15mpg/situational guy, then you might as well just quit watching CBB.
 
If, after watching these clips that @auror put together, you aren't excited if this kid comes to UConn to be a 10-15mpg/situational guy, then you might as well just quit watching CBB.

Yeah, he's more than acceptable as a backup. He's going to be our 4th best guard and probably our 3rd guy off the bench. He will be more than servicable in that role, and probably better than most 8th men in the country.
 
.-.
If, after watching these clips that @auror put together, you aren't excited if this kid comes to UConn to be a 10-15mpg/situational guy, then you might as well just quit watching CBB.
Does anyone get excited over backups? We’re not adding a future superstar here.
 
Compilation of some advanced stats. 39th best available transfer by RAPM/Hoop-Explorer, 56th by Evan Miya. By Win Shares he was between Polley and Gaffney last season.
diarra-Combined.png
 
Does anyone get excited over backups? We’re not adding a future superstar here.
Yeah, he's more than acceptable as a backup. He's going to be our 4th best guard and probably our 3rd guy off the bench. He will be more than servicable in that role, and probably better than most 8th men in the country.
He’s also technically a soon-to-be sophomore in terms of eligibility so ya I’m excited to see how he will develop over the next few seasons. He should be a good piece
 
.-.
I agree with this but I also hate the idea on these threads that we have to do a 1:1 comparison of who we brought in vs who we lost. We do not want to bring in clones for the guys we lost, because that means we have the same lineup issues as last year. We had 1 guy last year who would (or could?) beat his man off the dribble, and that guy was barely 6’ tall. This year we should have at least 3 of those guys on the court assuming Jackson and Hawkins develop like we expect them too. Add in a junior year Sanogo, and this team is going to be so much more fluid and versatile.
The pieces will fit together a lot better, and each individual player will have a lot fewer glaring weaknesses and be more multi-dimensional.
 
You do if the starting lineup is really solid and you're looking for a really good and complimentary depth piece.
Really good is stretching it, he’s solid at best. Nothing exciting.
Lol we have people here doing major handwringing and giving themselves ulcers about the prospect of us only filling 11-12 of our schollies instead of 13.
So adding anyone is exciting? Doesn’t there have to be levels to this?
He’s also technically a soon-to-be sophomore in terms of eligibility so ya I’m excited to see how he will develop over the next few seasons. He should be a good piece
Yeah, a good piece. But he’s a role player, guess I can’t get excited for players of that caliber.
The lack of backup ballhandlers lost us games last season, so yes.
That was a problem, but he’s not an exciting solution. But solid.
No
 
Really good is stretching it, he’s solid at best. Nothing exciting.

So adding anyone is exciting? Doesn’t there have to be levels to this?

Yeah, a good piece. But he’s a role player, guess I can’t get excited for players of that caliber.

That was a problem, but he’s not an exciting solution. But solid.

No
Seems like you're unexcitable.
 
Coincidentally this is also my answer to the question "Is Huskyforlife a good poster anymore?" No idea what happened but you've become miserable since the season ended
Ouch, don’t know what I said to deserve that? I’m still really excited for next season and like the transfers we’ve picked up so far. But sometimes I call out things that make me scratch my head.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,321
Messages
4,563,519
Members
10,457
Latest member
SeanElAmin


Top Bottom