Yeah, I don't get this. For all the "the game has changed" stuff directed at me about liking forwards on the team, this shows a complete misunderstanding of the fact that the traditional "point guard" is also a dinosaur position. Hurley used the word "facilitator". That's the current reality. You are either a guy who is good at creating shots for others or you aren't. He is. Newton is. Alleyne might be.
The focus on a "break them down" PG is a throwback to ISO basketball. Most shots are now supposed to be created by ball movement and spacing. Only if that fails does somebody need to beat their man off the dribble. And yes, Andre can certainly do that. The motion and passing should causes switches, and the offense should attack any mismatches. Andre is very much a mismatch against both small guards and many bigs.
Facilitators, connectors, and finishers.
Facilitators pass guys open or create openings for a pass. Often generate advantages. Point guard, point forward, point center, some combo guards.
Connectors are good passers that keep the ball moving and get hockey assists or assists in the flow of the offense. Essentially plus passers without the ability to create advantages, only exploit them with passes. Often good passing wings are this type, but can be guards or bigs as well.
Finishers rarely pass, but take a good amount of shots. Capitalize on advantages generated by others or themselves. Not just bigs, but also guards and wings that are run off screens for shots or specialist spot up shooters.