What stadium in the last 30 years has an overhang?If it someday gets re-modeled the thing they seem to be missing in their proposals is improving fan seating for the masses - not the few ultra premium seating but seating that will entice sell outs vs stay at home on HD TV.
There are ways with overhanging second decks etc to vastly improve the seating. Without that another CT busway white elephant.
Almost all.What stadium in the last 30 years has an overhang?
There's a difference between a second level and "overhang"Almost all.
The state is in an economic funk and it remain that way as long as long as the state government maintains a high tax policy. Does Connecticut want to grow like it did from 1945 to 1980? Go back to the low taxes we had then. This is not rocket science. High taxes and strict regulations strangle business.
Government should try to attract business, not run it off.
To me it's the age old question, which comes first the chicken or the egg? Connecticut has always struggled with that. How do you get a state out of an economic funk? Does anyone remember the intense discussion over building the Rent? Major factions then and now believed the money would have been better spent on putting more money into the city of Hartford [imagine how they could have pi--ed it away] or more welfare etc,
Would we have been better to have Hartford put $75 mil into a baseball park or into a new stadium for Basketball and Hockey? How about $600 million into a new XL center rather into Malloys pet busway which is mainly used to allow Central students party in downtown Hartford. We in Ct. Are our own worse enemy . Sorry, as in business, you can't lay off to get to sustained profitability . It's takes investment.
Perhaps that is a good thing as far as the XL center goes, since there is no realistic projections for any reasonable ROI from dumping $600 M into that building.As one of the most indebted states per capita, with one of the highest tax burdens per capita, the question of chicken and egg on state subsidized economic development is as cloudy as ever given we are also last in job recovery since 2008. Regardless of your political POV, its pretty clear in the decade to come, CT will have fewer arrows in its quiver to develop new civic projects given it largely has spent its wad so to speak. There isn't really any rope left to borrow or tax more to juice the local economy.
As one of the most indebted states per capita, with one of the highest tax burdens per capita, the question of chicken and egg on state subsidized economic development is as cloudy as ever given we are also last in job recovery since 2008. Regardless of your political POV, its pretty clear in the decade to come, CT will have fewer arrows in its quiver to develop new civic projects given it largely has spent its wad so to speak. There isn't really any rope left to borrow or tax more to juice the local economy.
An arena is not a priority investment. It doesn't generate revenue. It doesn't foster economic development.
Page 2
http://crdact.net/data/Unsorted/5-19-2016-BoardMeetingMinutes-73532-1.pdf
$250,000 unfavorable isn't that bad for a 40 yr old arena. 130 events and over a 1/2 million people to downtown Hartford. Hockey events were even with budget.
Buy more $9 beers and park @ Church St Garage since its owned by CRDA. Don't park @ LAZ spots. Parking @ Garage and buying concessions makes the arena $$$. Hockey events made more $ in terms of beer and concession sales for arena compared to b-ball.
Bonding interest rates are at an all time low with Brexit. Now is the time for investment. Rates are lower now when they first built it and lower when they re-built it.