- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 518
- Reaction Score
- 1,004
Bertolini wants to leave CT.
Bertolini wants to leave CT.
why would Malloy spend money on something actually used?
He thinks people want to ride buses from New Britain to Hartford and go to miner league baseball in Hartford's north-end
brilliant he ain't, unless you think buying certain demographics outweighs creating jobs and keeping GE's
CRDA meeting minutes - Jan
http://www.crdact.net/data/Unsorted/1-14-2016-ApprovedBoardMinutes-73404-1.pdf
CRDA meeting minutes - Feb
http://www.crdact.net/data/Unsorted/2-18-2016-ApprovedBoardMinutes-73476-1.pdf
How's this "new road into the stadium" different from original plans for what was initially called a flyway from I-84 to the Rent? Or, is it one and the same just delayed and now with possible muni bond financing? Either way, who cares if in any remote way it helps rescue our Huskies from the current island and onward and upward to a better conference?Feb minutes state that $7M has been approved for a new road into the stadium AND $1M approved for construction of a new parking lot over 10 acres to accommodate 1,000 extra cars...will be complete before the start of the 2016 football season. Looks like UConn is getting all of our ducks in a row in anticipation of a stadium expansion in the near future.
How's this "new road into the stadium" different from original plans for what was initially called a flyway from I-84 to the Rent? Or, is it one and the same just delayed and now with possible muni bond financing? Either way, who cares if in any remote way it helps rescue our Huskies from the current island and onward and upward to a better conference?
The sound of facetiously suggesting a purported "new road" has any CR-relationship flying past at warp speed ... whoosh! Back to the actual question for anyone with direct insight; same or different road from the original "flyway" proposed for the Rent?For all the reasons UConn has been screwed in CR - access to the stadium would be a strange one. If they are building out roads it's to help outlet traffic.
For all the reasons UConn has been screwed in CR - access to the stadium would be a strange one. If they are building out roads it's to help outlet traffic.
It would be 363 days a year against 6.
^^^ def some good stuff in the minutes. I also like that Malloy isn't completely against the XL renovations and put some already allocated bond $ to fix/replace the ice making machine
So 369 days a year?
This XL Center transformation was Gov. Malloy's idea.. Obviously he's not against it.
I hear ya. Even with the on-going budget issues, it reaffirms his commitment and because I saw this:
Governor Malloy conveyed that he can’t imagine Hartford without an XL Center, or an equivalent thereof. He expressed that CRDA has done the early work of competitive data regarding either a rebuilt or a brand new center. If the architects and consultants can accomplish what they are saying for the amount that they are estimating and agreements with parties involved can be reached, then it would make sense to move forward.
Plus this:
In light of the current state budget situation, the Governor is deferring the decision to put new funds into the capital budget for the XL or its long term transformation at this time. He has, however, given CRDA the discretion to use bond funds previously authorized for the agency for (1) land acquisition, (2) design work and (3) capital improvements that would serve the current building as well as be retained in any future improved building (e.g., ice repair).
Yes we're broke, but it's bonded and doesn't have to go through legislature. Some say its already fully bonded with interest rates WAY lower than they were when they 1st built the HCC. Next year they will actually allocate the bonds to the XL over 2-3 years so it's not a huge drag on budget.
Also check this out: (Take it for what its worth, but they are connected with CRDA)
Listen 15-21 minutes in. New ice making machine and 2 new zambonis by summer 2017
As a new resident of semi-Metro Atlanta it takes me 90 minutes to travel 25 miles on an excellent commute home. I'm not sure there is a situation in Connecticut that compares to 5 lanes of bumper to bumper traffic crawling along.You underestimate how many traffic jams there are on the Pike/95/93
As a new resident of semi-Metro Atlanta it takes me 90 minutes to travel 25 miles on an excellent commute home. I'm not sure there is a situation in Connecticut that compares to 5 lanes of bumper to bumper traffic crawling along.
Are people still stranded there from 1999? It's clearly not stopped dead.Metro NYC has the Cross Bronx and Van Wyck, which are bumper-to-bumper 24/7/365 while CT does have that 10 mile stretch of I-84 through Waterbury that is 2, then 3, then 4, then 2, then 4 lanes of traffic, also usually stopped dead.
Are people still stranded there from 1999? It's clearly not stopped dead.
My wife used to live in Norwalk (near fire HQ and the on ramp to 95) and commuted to Darien. 7 mile ride avg was 45 min and that was good time.As a new resident of semi-Metro Atlanta it takes me 90 minutes to travel 25 miles on an excellent commute home. I'm not sure there is a situation in Connecticut that compares to 5 lanes of bumper to bumper traffic crawling along.
As a new resident of semi-Metro Atlanta it takes me 90 minutes to travel 25 miles on an excellent commute home. I'm not sure there is a situation in Connecticut that compares to 5 lanes of bumper to bumper traffic crawling along.
I've yet to see Farmington hill in Atlanta too.Whoa there! Farmington to Hartford is like that most mornings despite all the traffic the busway was supposed to take off the highway. No its not five lanes but it should be. Add to that the crawl up the Farmngton hill which I've never seen in Atlanta.