McLovin
Gangstas, what's up?
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2018
- Messages
- 2,965
- Reaction Score
- 18,878
They need 2 more teams to qualify as a conference, so that’s one…absolutely but there's no conceivable reason for them to just add us for football
They need 2 more teams to qualify as a conference, so that’s one…absolutely but there's no conceivable reason for them to just add us for football
I just don't see how a reshaped MWC/AAC gets these kind of revenue numbers
I think we do it, depending on the share from the PAC. The likelihood of getting an all-sports invite to a conference before 2031, especially one that pays more than Big East + PAC football, is really small.Wonder how UConn would feel about a 5 year GOR… on one hand we’d have a football home. On the other, we wouldn’t be able to put football anywhere else (like the Bug 12) if they came calling. Tough one.
I think we do it, depending on the share from the PAC. The likelihood of getting an all-sports invite to a conference before 2031, especially one that pays more than Big East + PAC football, is really small.
I think the more likely scenario is that FSU and Clemson join the SEC, UNC and Miami join the big ten, and then a few stragglers like Louisville, VT, and Duke/NC st join the big 12. That would make the ACC a lot less appealing as a conference of the remaining teams.sarcasm aside let's say F$U, clemson, miami, and UNC join the BIG12. that would leave a 14 team conference with: UConn, Cuse, BC, Pitt, VT, UVA, NC St, duke, Wake, GT, Lville, SMU, Cal, Stanford and ND as a partial member.
if it paid out ~$15-20 mill/year (which seems realistic if the new PAC is projected to get ~$12mill/year) that could almost triple our current tv revenue.
so you're hoping to stay indy for football and in the BE for bball? cause that's the only other realistic option....
PS- you dont have to tag someone's username when you're replying to their post.
Nobody is leaving the ACC for the Big XII. At this point it is unlikely that the B1G or SEC want any of the ACC schools. The SEC might take FSU and Clemson, but I don't think the B1G is interested anymore, it got the 4 top programs from the Pac. Rumors of the ACC's demise are greatly exaggerated. It's still better off than the Big XII.I think the more likely scenario is that FSU and Clemson join the SEC, UNC and Miami join the big ten, and then a few stragglers like Louisville, VT, and Duke/NC st join the big 12. That would make the ACC a lot less appealing as a conference of the remaining teams.
What would be an interesting scenario is if some of the remaining schools then join the PAC 12 for an East/West division (minus BC of course).
If Clemson and FSU leave, which is very realistic and only roadblock being the grant of rights, then that downgrades the ACC a lot. UNC would be the next biggest brand and absolutely one the big ten would want. That leaves Miami and maybe VT as next biggest brands, and also the big 12 as a lot more appealing. I think Miami fits well with the big ten geographically and academically, but maybe not (VT and Miami would still definitely be brands the big 12 would want though).Nobody is leaving the ACC for the Big XII. At this point it is unlikely that the B1G or SEC want any of the ACC schools. The SEC might take FSU and Clemson, but I don't think the B1G is interested anymore, it got the 4 top programs from the Pac. Rumors of the ACC's demise are greatly exaggerated. It's still better off than the Big XII.
A conference with 6 teams would have no reason to add a big brand as a football only member as they are trying to get off the ground?absolutely but there's no conceivable reason for them to just add us for football
No one from the PAC12 was supposed to leave for the big12 either but the same exact thing is going to play out in about 10 years. All 3 of the sec big10 and big12 are going to renew their tv contracts right before the acc leaving them scrapsNobody is leaving the ACC for the Big XII.
It would be a complete gesture of charity for anyone to add us football only. Won’t believe it until I see it.A conference with 6 teams would have no reason to add a big brand as a football only member as they are trying to get off the ground?
The only school the big10 deems worthy is notre dame. The big10 and sec don’t need the others but the big12 would gladly take themI think the more likely scenario is that FSU and Clemson join the SEC, UNC and Miami join the big ten.
No one from the PAC12 was supposed to leave for the big12 either but the same exact thing is going to play out in about 10 years. All 3 of the sec big10 and big12 are going to renew their tv contracts right before the acc leaving them scraps
Wonder how UConn would feel about a 5 year GOR… on one hand we’d have a football home. On the other, we wouldn’t be able to put football anywhere else (like the Bug 12) if they came calling. Tough one.
Could always send BB 1st if it came to that as you continue to build FB toward something resembling respectability!Wonder how UConn would feel about a 5 year GOR… on one hand we’d have a football home. On the other, we wouldn’t be able to put football anywhere else (like the Bug 12) if they came calling. Tough one.
It's different. The Pac was always the weakest and most vulnerable conference. It was also arrogant and misplayed an opportunity to expand. The simple reality is that Pacific time games are worth less than Eastern time games.No one from the PAC12 was supposed to leave for the big12 either but the same exact thing is going to play out in about 10 years. All 3 of the sec big10 and big12 are going to renew their tv contracts right before the acc leaving them scraps
If Clemson and FSU leaving was realistic, it would've happened. It didn't, and the GOR isn't the hold up.If Clemson and FSU leave, which is very realistic and only roadblock being the grant of rights, then that downgrades the ACC a lot. UNC would be the next biggest brand and absolutely one the big ten would want. That leaves Miami and maybe VT as next biggest brands, and also the big 12 as a lot more appealing. I think Miami fits well with the big ten geographically and academically, but maybe not (VT and Miami would still definitely be brands the big 12 would want though).
Point being, if the schools can get around the grant of rights, the ACC is going down.
UNC to the Big 10 is a no brained. They need a school that got blown out of its own building by James Madison. That’s the ticket all right.I think the more likely scenario is that FSU and Clemson join the SEC, UNC and Miami join the big ten, and then a few stragglers like Louisville, VT, and Duke/NC st join the big 12. That would make the ACC a lot less appealing as a conference of the remaining teams.
What would be an interesting scenario is if some of the remaining schools then join the PAC 12 for an East/West division (minus BC of course).
Single game outcomes should have no weight in such matters.UNC to the Big 10 is a no brained. They need a school that got blown out of its own building by James Madison. That’s the ticket all right.
Unless it is UConn getting blown out.Single game outcomes should have no weight in such matters.
The Big 12 didn't want to add us for football for 7 years. We can do a 5 year GOR in a different conference and still join the Big 12 as originally proposed.Wonder how UConn would feel about a 5 year GOR… on one hand we’d have a football home. On the other, we wouldn’t be able to put football anywhere else (like the Bug 12) if they came calling. Tough one.
They already agreed to join it 20 years ago, the President, the AD, and the Board of Trustees, but Alumni and boosters organized against it and killed it.Notre Dame is extremely unlikely to join the Big 10 due to things that happened as far back as the 19th century and a number of times since.
I saw a Youtube on this, but it's 30 minutes and rather nerdy... But here's an article that paraphrases the ideas from the video:
Worth a read...