It may be a laughing stock, but they have the power to tarnish Coach Auriemma and his WCBB program, not to mention take away scholarships and ban the team from post-season play. I refuse to laugh at an organization that can pretty much do whatever they want when it comes to enforcement. This very well could be payback for Shabazz spouting off and embarrassing Emmert on national TV.NCAA, also, rules in record time and thus proving once again to be the laughing stock everyone knows it to be.
I would love to see them try to ban the UConn women from the tournament. It would be the END of the NCAA.It may be a laughing stock, but they have the power to tarnish Coach Auriemma and his WCBB program, not to mention take away scholarships and ban the team from post-season play. I refuse to laugh at an organization that can pretty much do whatever they want when it comes to enforcement. This very well could be payback for Shabazz spouting off and embarrassing Emmert on national TV.
I said the same thing when the men were banned. I was wrong then just as you'd be wrong now. When it comes to the NCAA the only thing you can do is bend over and take it. It's not going away any time soon, especially not over a women's basketball program.I would love to see them try to ban the UConn women from the tournament. It would be the END of the NCAA.
It was not an AAC school according to reports.Someone somewhere is sitting in their big coaches chair smiling smugly to themselves.
I think if it was someone in the conference we may know who it was by the big can of whoopa s s Geno will open on the court.
That is why I said "if" - but same holds true for any other school. Then again, that isn't Geno's style...unless it is Syracuse.It was not an AAC school according to reports.
Wow. You afraid to leave your house, too?It may be a laughing stock, but they have the power to tarnish Coach Auriemma and his WCBB program, not to mention take away scholarships and ban the team from post-season play. I refuse to laugh at an organization that can pretty much do whatever they want when it comes to enforcement. This very well could be payback for Shabazz spouting off and embarrassing Emmert on national TV.
It may be a laughing stock, but they have the power to tarnish Coach Auriemma and his WCBB program, not to mention take away scholarships and ban the team from post-season play. I refuse to laugh at an organization that can pretty much do whatever they want when it comes to enforcement. This very well could be payback for Shabazz spouting off and embarrassing Emmert on national TV.
Or BC (ask Cathy Inglese what it feels like to give up 125)That is why I said "if" - but same holds true for any other school. Then again, that isn't Geno's style...unless it is Syracuse.
Wasn't that PC, not BC? I was at the Providence game when UConn hung 126 on them. That wasn't done out of a sense of "payback". Providence was just that bad.Or BC (ask Cathy Inglese what it feels like to give up 125)
It would be awesome if the school could, you know stop cheating, just for a few years. I mean the men just got off probation for God's sake so you'd think *someone* in the Athletic Department could say "yo Geno we don't have a great track record with the NCAA so maybe on these borderline cases we should just err on the side of caution." Sorry, I know most on here just care about the streaks and Ws, but I do actually give a damn about the athletic programs keeping it clean, and a secondary violation is still a violation.Wow. You afraid to leave your house, too?
BC, next game after Inglese left her starters in long after UCONN had removed theirs in a blowout. ("OK - you wanna see what a blowout REALLY looks like?") (And Svet was more than happy to oblige)Wasn't that PC, not BC? I was at the Providence game when UConn hung 126 on them. That wasn't done out of a sense of "payback". Providence was just that bad.
Uhhhh Kevin Ollie, mebbe?Who are they going to kick around when Geno retires in 2 years after winning his 11th NC game and rides off in the CT sunset?.....