The thing that fascinates me is that this wasn't a violation. It seems like when UConn is involved, the NCAA just makes up offenses on the fly. That organization is an abomination.
I prefer to call them what they really are: bullies. Bet this wouldn't be a violation anywhere else. It feels a lot like getting stopped by the local sheriff in some backwoods South Carolina town and the cop sees you have a Connecticut driver's license and knows it's his chance to screw with a Yankee ("well, well, well loooooky what we have here Cletus!") and do what he wants because there's nothing you can or will do about it. And Muffet says Geno doesn't have class...The thing that fascinates me is that this wasn't a violation. It seems like when UConn is involved, the NCAA just makes up offenses on the fly. That organization is an abomination.
When I heard that Geno contacted her I was surprised.
Please do not hold your breath for that. Still love Shabazz for telling him off on national TV right to his face. Of course I suspect that's largely why this is suddenly a violation, but that moment was worth every penny.The NCAA president owes the young girl an apology, and should do it on national TV.
I'm not an NCAA sympathizer, but I think the reason this is suddenly a violation is because a school filed a complaint, not because the NCAA was looking for something to nail UCONN with. The NCAA wasn't going to do anything without being put in a position of having to respond to a complaint. And they're still probably not going to do anything.Please do not hold your breath for that. Still love Shabazz for telling him off on national TV right to his face. Of course I suspect that's largely why this is suddenly a violation, but that moment was worth every penny.
Let's flood the NCAA and let them know how inane we consider their action.
Completely agree with this, but you would think someone in the compliance office at the NCAA would have the sense of self-preservation, if not common sense and decency to look at this and say 'This is ridiculously trivial and a waste of our time. Case dismissed.' Instead said compliance office tied themselves in knots trying to come up with a sound reason to classify this as a 'secondary violation' falling back on 'while she is young and this was completely unrelated to recruiting, she is not a typical 13 year old and therefore we are invoking rule ____' to be able to classify this as a violation.' That took some hard work and a equally petty attitude toward the situation as the original complaint displayed.I'm not an NCAA sympathizer, but I think the reason this is suddenly a violation is because a school filed a complaint, not because the NCAA was looking for something to nail UCONN with. The NCAA wasn't going to do anything without being put in a position of having to respond to a complaint. And they're still probably not going to do anything.
That's kind of my point. If UConn was UNC, it is my belief that the NCAA would have bent over backwards to find some loophole where they could justify why it wasn't a violation ergo they have it out for UConn. Maybe I'm just a pessimist, but if it were ANY OTHER SCHOOL I feel like they would issue a statement saying the complainant incorrectly interpreted the rule and that the NCAA has determined no violations occurred and case closed.Completely agree with this, but you would think someone in the compliance office at the NCAA would have the sense of self-preservation, if not common sense and decency to look at this and say 'This is ridiculously trivial and a waste of our time. Case dismissed.' Instead said compliance office tied themselves in knots trying to come up with a sound reason to classify this as a 'secondary violation' falling back on 'while she is young and this was completely unrelated to recruiting, she is not a typical 13 year old and therefore we are invoking rule ____' to be able to classify this as a violation.' That took some hard work and a equally petty attitude toward the situation as the original complaint displayed.
Who are they going to kick around when Geno retires in 2 years after winning his 11th NC game and rides off in the CT sunset?.....
Except John A. reported a high-level source told him it wasn't ND, Duke or MD.
And Triad strikes again. You do make me laugh!View attachment 6783
Thank goodness... the scores have been bad enough in the series the past 7 years..... I definitely didnt want to see a 127-38 beatdown this December
View attachment 6783
Thank goodness... the scores have been bad enough in the series the past 7 years..... I definitely didnt want to see a 127-38 beatdown this December
What makes you think that still won't be the score?View attachment 6783
Thank goodness... the scores have been bad enough in the series the past 7 years..... I definitely didnt want to see a 127-38 beatdown this December
I can see how the NCAA could, in good faith, interpret Mo'ne to be a "prospective student athlete", since she has basically already offered a verbal to UCONN. And I guess how I can see where they might rule a secondary violation with no consequences, just to send a message to the world like, "OK, let's not push it - we might be getting a little borderline here."Completely agree with this, but you would think someone in the compliance office at the NCAA would have the sense of self-preservation, if not common sense and decency to look at this and say 'This is ridiculously trivial and a waste of our time. Case dismissed.' Instead said compliance office tied themselves in knots trying to come up with a sound reason to classify this as a 'secondary violation' falling back on 'while she is young and this was completely unrelated to recruiting, she is not a typical 13 year old and therefore we are invoking rule ____' to be able to classify this as a violation.' That took some hard work and a equally petty attitude toward the situation as the original complaint displayed.