I’m not so sure about that. But I’m none the less disappointed that Boston wasn’t initially invited to the festivities. And ESPN’s about-face invitation after the uproar makes no sense to me. But then again, I’m a simple person with no intimate details relating to the ESPY’s.guarantee you if Paige was nominated and wasn't a winner they would have invited her.
If you've have followed South Carolina wbb, they have endured this pressure for the past two years going back to their outspoken views on racial injustice, the George Floyd situation, etc.... They were a missed putback away from one potential championship and steamrolled their way to a 2nd National Championship this past year. This will most likely give them another chip on their shoulder to drive them to a second one this year. This, if for no other reason, will most likely drive their focus this year rather than distract them, which will not be good for teams trying to catch the sleeping.It doesn't take ESPN to alert me to the reality of social discrimination. I suspect that their scheduling of awards was done on the basis of public interest because ratings are directly related to profits and the people at ESPN who have the say know how to keep their jobs.
Staley has just added more pressure on her team than merely defending the '22 title. Now they are a visible voice for racial justice. Answering questions about that for 8 months can't be good for focusing on basketball.
Oh yes, the horrible injustice of NOT getting an invite to an irrelevant award show/Hollywood party. That no one in her category got an invite to, that Boston didn't win.If you've have followed South Carolina wbb, they have endured this pressure for the past two years going back to their outspoken views on racial injustice, the George Floyd situation, etc.... They were a missed putback away from one potential championship and steamrolled their way to a 2nd National Championship this past year. This will most likely give them another chip on their shoulder to drive them to a second one this year. This, if for no other reason, will most likely drive their focus this year rather than distract them, which will not be good for teams trying to catch the sleeping.
Dawn never said it was a national outrage, she just simply asked a question. The hyperbole is from those that want to re-state her objections to not airing the award or inviting Boston yet using her and the other nominees to play up the ceremony. She and any other athlete who was not invited was a disrespect in the year of Title IX to the women who bring more content and viewers to ESPN than the women they did invite from the WNBA that you can barely find on any national television outlet. But women and more accurately black women often bear the brunt of missteps or slight miscalculations that arise like this one. She spoke for all women. Wonder if there would have been a call for women from some who see no need to address issues like this, if they just resort to only inviting males to the espys. If you do not address things when they occur, you eventually will end up with the conditions that led to the inequities in the final four from a year ago. Funny, many players like Beuckers, Haley Jones, Fran Belibi, Beucker's father and countless others supported her position. Makes one wonder, how many of those that propose to advocate for equality for women and other minorities, become so quiet and unbothered if an apparent slight does not involve their favorite team or player.Oh yes, the horrible injustice of NOT getting an invite to an irrelevant award show/Hollywood party. That no one in her category got an invite to, that Boston didn't win.
Oh the injustice.
Staley called for "national outrage." If not getting invited to a hokey party is an national outrage, what is Brittney Griner's situation? School kids getting massacred? Poor American communities not having a water supply they can drink from or bathe in?
For Dawn, who supposedly is a voice for young Black women, to claim this is a "national outrage" is laughable. It's actually insulting given some of the real national outrages we have in this country.
Boston was disrespected? She won NPOY, DPOY and was MVP of the Final Four. She has been glorified by numerous overwhelming positive ESPN video and magazine features. In what universe has she ever been disrespected? (Except maybe one clip of her in tears along with another player from AZ -- hint: TV has been showing players in tears for 50 years, she's hardly the only one).
Dawn is playing this up as a media issue because it is her brand to play the victim. I find it disgusting.
Dawn didn't simply ask a question. See her original tweet.Dawn never said it was a national outrage, she just simply asked a question. The hyperbole is from those that want to re-state her objections to not airing the award or inviting Boston yet using her and the other nominees to play up the ceremony. She and any other athlete who was not invited was a disrespect in the year of Title IX to the women who bring more content and viewers to ESPN than the women they did invite from the WNBA that you can barely find on any national television outlet. But women and more accurately black women often bear the brunt of missteps or slight miscalculations that arise like this one. She spoke for all women. Wonder if there would have been a call for women from some who see no need to address issues like this, if they just resort to only inviting males to the espys. If you do not address things when they occur, you eventually will end up with the conditions that led to the inequities in the final four from a year ago. Funny, many players like Beuckers, Haley Jones, Fran Belibi, Beucker's father and countless others supported her position. Makes one wonder, how many of those that propose to advocate for equality for women and other minorities, become so quiet and unbothered if an apparent slight does not involve their favorite team or player.
Dawn didn't simply ask a question. She her original tweet.
That's cool for you. But what also matters is the exposure and recognition of these athletes. There's already a huge disparity when it comes to players that look like Boston vs players they normally highlight. Paige made it a focal point of her speech last year and ESPN used it for likes and interactions but did nothing with that information.If a UConn team -- or a UConn player -- never gets nominated or invited to the ESPYs again I could care less. I doubt our coaches could care less. I doubt our players could care less.
It is a meaningless show. The Naismith Awards matter. National titles matter. NCAA end-of-the-season awards matter.
A red carpet appearance and an interview that some people who don't watch Women's Basketball could have be exposed to. Plus the possible networking opportunities being surrounded by other top athletes and such in the industry. It was missed opportunity that could have been remedied early by ESPN once they realized she was interested. And yes I still be it's outrage when college WBB isn't represented on the network that has the rights priority rights of said sport.Boston had a glowing 7 minute interview with Holly Rowe on ESPN, and it was shown over and over on ESPN telecasts and SportsCenter. That same audience you speak of would have seen numerous ESPN the Magazine features about her. She earned all the post season awards imaginable.
Plus since she didn't win the award, voted by the public, she wouldn't have spoken on stage. So the most she would have gotten was a quick clip. That recognition is pretty meaningless.
Sorry. We're gonna have to agree to disagree on this. But to have created a firestorm over it, without understanding why ESPN did it, was BS.
Speak your piece. I am done with this really foolish "national outrage."
And yet you keep coming back, if you're done then be done. This is just one issue of a larger looming issue that's be noted by many people including the winner of the award last year. There's always bigger issues but doesn't negated what occured Just because "you" don't care then don't tell rest of us that it's a non issue. If this outrage makes is so any top female athlete no matter their complexion or school affiliation is given the opportunity to represent for WBB going forward, then it was well worth it in the end.So for all the challenges that are faced by female black athletes, black women in marketing, and female athletes, you want to tie your "national outrage" to an awards show invite and walk on the red carpet?
Knock yourself out. But, there are far bigger, more important issues Staley, in her position, could truly make a difference on. But she focuses on a red carpet. SMH.
I'm disgusted and done here.
Why does it sound like you've ignored, or are unaware of what she's done prior to the ESPYs situation? She's consistently talking about the issues you've referred to. She uses her social media platform as another way to get the word out. She's not focused solely on the ESPY snub.So for all the challenges that are faced by female black athletes, black women in marketing, and female athletes, you want to tie your "national outrage" to an awards show invite and walk on the red carpet?
Knock yourself out. But, there are far bigger, more important issues Staley, in her position, could truly make a difference on. But she focuses on a red carpet. SMH.
I'm disgusted and done here.
I'm not sure, I believe she was on a podcast a couple of weeks ago and said she was still looking for 3 more games. She said one of the previously planned opponents turned down playing us again. I didn't really think about who that could be until now, hmmm....A brief change of the subject, but does anyone know when yall (SC) release the non conference schedule? Since yall begged out of being possibly met with the fire and brimstone released by Lawson's group, curious to see who yall got to replace us.
View attachment 77717
Last couple of seasons, the schedules were released in September. Last season’s release was on 9/21.A brief change of the subject, but does anyone know when yall (SC) release the non conference schedule? Since yall begged out of being possibly met with the fire and brimstone released by Lawson's group, curious to see who yall got to replace us.
View attachment 77717
I think we have NC State this year.A brief change of the subject, but does anyone know when yall (SC) release the non conference schedule? Since yall begged out of being possibly met with the fire and brimstone released by Lawson's group, curious to see who yall got to replace us.
View attachment 77717
I think we have NC State this year.
I know for sure we have Stanford, Maryland, and UConn.
Exactly! Really wish we can get this thread back on topic…Please let it go.