- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 30,093
- Reaction Score
- 50,072
What I find lacks credibility is Paterno's insistence that he did not learn any details of what McQueary saw in the shower. If I heard this story involving a good friend and coaching colleague for 30 years I would want to know EXACTLY what the person saw. I just don't find it credible that Paterno listens to an assistant say he saw "something inappropriate" or whatever and not share details. Anyone would want to know details not because they would enjoy hearing them but to affirm the story of the eye witness to the crime, given how incredible the story is.
Public opinion is asserting that even if Paterno did not learn any details, the incident was gruesome and criminal enough that Paterno should have told the AD when Paterno reported what McQueary saw to call the cops and to let him know when they arrive because I want to talk to them too. And if the cops didn't show up within an hour Paterno would call them himself. We don't know a lot about this episode but I am wondering if Paterno ever followed up with the AD or finance guy who both heard the story to find out what was being done to get to the bottom of the issue.
Just to add one other slant to this, which really makes me question what Paterno knew, the 1998 incident was reported to authorities. Subsequently, Sandusky was forced out of his position, AND Paterno didn't show up to Sandusky's retirement party. So, one can speculate that Paterno certainly knows a lot more.