100%- people are tuning in to see Caitlin play (myself included) but that is kinda the point- if they can develop stars that people will tune in to watch within content they already own/have under their umbrella that ties into other premium content they show, it seemingly is a no brainer to put more of that content on bigger channels/platforms than just stuffing it on BTN/B1G+Iowa…the Kaitlan Clark effect. Of course folks tuned in for the record breaking performance.
Innocent neglect or something sinister? IDK - tis curious
Then let them get us into a conference.And at the same time, ESPN is showing us an unusual amount of love...
I think the players know the outcome, just not the details. They know who is leaving the ACC and where they are going. They also know who the ACC replacements are.Then let them get us into a conference.
I think the players know the outcome, just not the details. They know who is leaving the ACC and where they are going. They also know who the ACC replacements are.
Would you all be happy in an ACC without FSU, UNC and the others? Is the Big East that important to you all?
The devil is in the details right? If the big 10 is offering us, though I do "care" about the big east, we move. If the ACC remnants are offering us, it depends who remains among the leftovers and how big a media deal they have.I think the players know the outcome, just not the details. They know who is leaving the ACC and where they are going. They also know who the ACC replacements are.
Would you all be happy in an ACC without FSU, UNC and the others? Is the Big East that important to you all?
The BE is great. MSG is great. It appears that the power conferences have plans to monopolize BB as well with higher amounts of guaranteed bids. UConn would be a good fit for ACC and hopefully the ACC would continue to receive a pretty good payout at least compared to UConn’ current situation.I think the players know the outcome, just not the details. They know who is leaving the ACC and where they are going. They also know who the ACC replacements are.
Would you all be happy in an ACC without FSU, UNC and the others? Is the Big East that important to you all?
I would have us jump on it! The current Big East is fine, but it isn’t home (neither our old home or our future). It’s a pit stop with a bit of nostalgia.I think the players know the outcome, just not the details. They know who is leaving the ACC and where they are going. They also know who the ACC replacements are.
Would you all be happy in an ACC without FSU, UNC and the others? Is the Big East that important to you all?
Are you asking would we be happy back in the big east, er, ACC? Do you know who was in BE 20 years ago?I think the players know the outcome, just not the details. They know who is leaving the ACC and where they are going. They also know who the ACC replacements are.
Would you all be happy in an ACC without FSU, UNC and the others? Is the Big East that important to you all?
I agree that the players know most of the looming movements... from the UConn perspective, I think it's going to really depend on who the ACC remnants are in terms of the basketball side of things (FB will be an improvement over being independent; especially if Notre Dame continues to be playing a partial ACC schedule; time will tell on that)... from the men's BB perspective, I think as long as ACC remnants include BC, Syracuse, and at least one of Louisville, Pitt, or VA Tech then it will be received fairly well because we could presumably get out of conference games with Villanova, Georgetown, St. John's, Seton Hall, Providence regularly enough to please the fanbase (maybe throw in Marquette). I don’t think anyone will miss Xavier, Butler, DePaul. Creighton, meh....I think the players know the outcome, just not the details. They know who is leaving the ACC and where they are going. They also know who the ACC replacements are.
Would you all be happy in an ACC without FSU, UNC and the others? Is the Big East that important to you all?
Do you actually believe that eleven schools will find a home in the SEC or B1G?The likeliest ACC leftovers:
BC
Cal
Duke
SMU
South Florida (as a backfill for FSU)
Stanford
Syracuse
Wake
That's just above AAC-level football rights for that group.
The likeliest ACC leftovers:
BC
Cal
Duke
SMU
Stanford
Syracuse
Wake
That's just above AAC-level football rights for that group.
Pitt and Louisville are not going anywhere. Doubtful NC State is going anywhere, unless the P2 start dumping their Vanderbilts and Rutgerses to make room for conference upgrades.The likeliest ACC leftovers:
BC
Cal
Duke
SMU
South Florida (as a backfill for FSU)
Stanford
Syracuse
Wake
That's just above AAC-level football rights for that group.
The big 12 would love to have Pitt and LouisvillePitt and Louisville are not going anywhere. Doubtful NC State is going anywhere, unless the P2 start dumping their Vanderbilts and Rutgerses to make room for conference upgrades.
There are a limited number of P2 spots remaining. UVA and UNC are at the front of the line. FSU must be certain of a lifeline to be behaving the way they are. After that, no one is guaranteed anything.
The ACC can survive and succeed as long as they play it smart.
Simple logic when speculating. How does your speculation fall within rule #1?Pitt and Louisville are not going anywhere. Doubtful NC State is going anywhere, unless the P2 start dumping their Vanderbilts and Rutgerses to make room for conference upgrades.
There are a limited number of P2 spots remaining. UVA and UNC are at the front of the line. FSU must be certain of a lifeline to be behaving the way they are. After that, no one is guaranteed anything.
The ACC can survive and succeed as long as they play it smart.
Research in MotionWhat will the P1 look like?
I said nothing about UConn in my comment, only the ACC. They will survive in some form, as 3 conferences are simply not enough to hold all the schools with brand value. If they are smart and forward-thinking, their member schools can thrive. But that's a big "if".Simple logic when speculating. How does your speculation fall within rule #1?
You know this, how?The big 12 would love to have Pitt and Louisville
You answered your own question. Has logic especially with the ACC ever been the way they operated?I said nothing about UConn in my comment, only the ACC. They will survive in some form, as 3 conferences are simply not enough to hold all the schools with brand value. If they are smart and forward-thinking, their member schools can thrive. But that's a big "if".
Rule 1 says that if the ACC thrives, then UConn never gets an invitation. If UConn is somehow invited, then the ACC must be tanking.
But that's kind of absurd; inviting UConn is one of the smart, forward-thinking moves that would keep the conference thriving. If they go for Tulane and Memphis instead, then sure UConn gets screwed but so does everyone else remaining in the ACC.
You know this, how?
And if the conference payouts are similar, why do you think those schools will jump?
They would certainly jump to the P2, as would anyone. You think those invitations are forthcoming for any more than a select few ACC schools?