- Joined
- Mar 2, 2024
- Messages
- 431
- Reaction Score
- 1,685
Transfer Portal for the win! ... if Cronin behaves like that in public, imagine what he does in private
Transfer Portal for the win! ... if Cronin behaves like that in public, imagine what he does in private
Storming a court for beating the #13 team when their best player gets hurt is not a choice I would make.Texas Tech loses at Arizona St, and loses Toppin to a leg injury.
Miami is going to be an interesting one to watch. Being undefeated at this point in the season is impressive no matter who you are playing. But, let's say they lose in the conference final or semi final. UMass had them on the ropes a couple weeks ago and gave them a good run last night. Akron could knock them off if they play really well. So Miami finishes the regular season with 1 loss but their metrics are horrendous. They are 84th on Kenpom now (49th NET) and their non conference SOS is 359th!! They are 1-0 in Quad 1 and 2 games combined. They also played THREE Division 2 team this season. If you do the blind resume thing there is no way they'd get in. Wondering if the committee would throw them in the play in games. All that said, they would be fun to watch as a 13, 14 or 15 seed in the NCAA Tournament. Their offense scores a lot and they take a bunch of threes - their defense isnt good so it'd likely be a high scoring game.Miami gets 2, zags 1, some random team (Santa Clara? McNeese?) 1
Miami is friggin good at offense.
Miami is going to be an interesting one to watch. Being undefeated at this point in the season is impressive no matter who you are playing. But, let's say they lose in the conference final or semi final. UMass had them on the ropes a couple weeks ago and gave them a good run last night. Akron could knock them off if they play really well. So Miami finishes the regular season with 1 loss but their metrics are horrendous. They are 84th on Kenpom now (49th NET) and their non conference SOS is 359th!! They are 1-0 in Quad 1 and 2 games combined. They also played THREE Division 2 team this season. If you do the blind resume thing there is no way they'd get in. Wondering if the committee would throw them in the play in games. All that said, they would be fun to watch as a 13, 14 or 15 seed in the NCAA Tournament. Their offense scores a lot and they take a bunch of threes - their defense isnt good so it'd likely be a high scoring game.
I meant the whole class - McNeeley was a reactive get as we got him late. I often wonder if they had to do it all over again, if they would have gone with Reed given he's not exactly the prototype for the system.
Pretty much confirmation that Cronin was in the wrongDirty play builds on itself, and I don’t like watching street fights in basketball games. Cronin made the right move.
True, I guess my point is that the cycle as a whole didn't feel really well thought out. It ultimately yielded two starting years.McNeeley was a reactive get but he was still a get. Reed may not be the perfect fit but he is also not a miss. You can argue he isn't a perfect 10/10 like Silas but he's not a zero like the three guys that came and left without doing anything from that class.
What point are you trying to make? We got two good players and two bad players in that cycle. Nowell wasn't our first choice and they recruited Abraham thinking they would get his cousin Ngongba.We got McNeeley late off an Indiana decommit, coming off a B2B. There was nothing strategic or planned about it.
Prototype is rim protector, lob runner.
My point is that it was a poor recruiting cycle, theory being coaches not as focused after the B2B.What point are you trying to make? We got two good players and two bad players in that cycle. Nowell wasn't our first choice and they recruited Abraham thinking they would get his cousin Ngongba.
As for prototype. Samson and not Sanogo?
It's also worth noting that for all the talk of Michigan destroying teams this year they are now 14-12 against the spread. They are and should be the favorite, but they are much closer to the field than a runaway favorite despite what people want you to believe
At least you stopped beating around the bushMy point is that it was a poor recruiting cycle, theory being coaches not as focused after the B2B.
They'd be undefeated if not for Whisky coming in and surprising them with their Center and PF going 8-14 from 3.They have had their hiccups, but their A game is significantly better than anyone else's.
I think that’s a bit of generalizing the situations of the two. We peaked early (due to competition, remains to be seen about our peak in playing) while Mich had a huge stretch early of blowouts but have also continued to beat very good to great teams. We are also 9-17 ATS, so 14-12 is a significant bit better.They have, which is definitely a good sign for them. It's just interesting to see the narrative around a team like Michigan who has played up and down to their competition all year versus the narrative around UConn doing the same thing this year. And the fact it's coming from UConn fans makes it even weirder
They would've lost to Wake if Wake didn't choke. They would've lost to Penn State if PSU had their best player and didn't choke at the end.They'd be undefeated if not for Whisky coming in and surprising them with their Center and PF going 8-14 from 3.
Reed wasn’t a miss regardless of prototypeI meant the whole class - McNeeley was a reactive get as we got him late. I often wonder if they had to do it all over again, if they would have gone with Reed given he's not exactly the prototype for the system.
And Uconn would have........ Does it bother you if another team is good? Whisky went 15-34 from 3 that game, it was an outlier. They are the team to beat, as recognized by the quality of their roster months ago, thank you. It wasn't hard to see, yet people like you can't stomach acceptance of it for whatever bizarre reason. It's weird. You're bringing up games in the first couple weeks of the year with team that was made up entirely of transfers.They would've lost to Wake if Wake didn't choke. They would've lost to Penn State is PSU had their best player and didn't choke at the end.
He's the one grab.Reed wasn’t a miss regardless of prototype
Just get us a shot at them and we’ll take our chances.They have had their hiccups, but their A game is significantly better than anyone else's.
I meant the whole class - McNeeley was a reactive get as we got him late. I often wonder if they had to do it all over again, if they would have gone with Reed given he's not exactly the prototype for the system.
No, I'm just calling out your nonsense. If you're going to say they would be undefeated if the other team didn't shoot well while disregarding the games they should've lost you're going to get called out on it.And Uconn would have........ Does it bother you if another team is good? Whisky went 15-34 from 3 that game, it was an outlier. They are the team to beat, as recognized by the quality of their roster months ago, thank you. It wasn't hard to see, yet people like you can't stomach acceptance of it for whatever bizarre reason. It's weird. You're bringing up games in the first couple weeks of the year with team that was made up entirely of transfers.
Hopefully we get a shot at them in the F4 and pull off an outlier.
He's the one grab.
Our "prototype" is a generationally great 7'2" defender. Who knew?As for prototype. Samson and not Sanogo?
Pretty much confirmation that Cronin was in the wrong
Everyone is entitled to their opinions, but it's weird when even if we haven't improved as much as some would like we also haven't really dropped off either. We have leveled off at an elite level which seems like something fans should be excited to watchI think that’s a bit of generalizing the situations of the two. We peaked early (due to competition, remains to be seen about our peak in playing) while Mich had a huge stretch early of blowouts but have also continued to beat very good to great teams. We are also 9-17 ATS, so 14-12 is a significant bit better.
I wouldn’t call it weird seeing some narrative from our fans. I’m not saying they would demolish us or even beat us in a neutral setting, just simply that they have been impressive. I think even some of the most loyal UConn fans can admit that while we’ve been winning, a lot of it hasn’t necessarily been impressive.
Are you a bot? I’m seriously starting to question lmao. You pull the same card anytime someone disagrees with you. “Why are you offended someone else is good”. It’s so strange.And Uconn would have........ Does it bother you if another team is good? Whisky went 15-34 from 3 that game, it was an outlier. They are the team to beat, as recognized by the quality of their roster months ago, thank you. It wasn't hard to see, yet people like you can't stomach acceptance of it for whatever bizarre reason. It's weird. You're bringing up games in the first couple weeks of the year with team that was made up entirely of transfers.
Hopefully we get a shot at them in the F4 and pull off an outlier.
He's the one grab.