- Joined
- Apr 25, 2014
- Messages
- 5,289
- Reaction Score
- 19,755
Over/under 6.5 ppg?
That's the thing: I have no idea. I could see him scoring 10-12 ppg, but I could also see him scoring 3-4. We've seen so little of him that I don't know what we have.
Over/under 6.5 ppg?
Over/under 6.5 ppg?
That's the thing: I have no idea. I could see him scoring 10-12 ppg, but I could also see him scoring 3-4. We've seen so little of him that I don't know what we have.
I don't see needing 10 to 12 from Facey. 5 sounds about right.
The bulk of our scoring will come from the 1-3 spots, and hopefully Amida will be effective on put backs and dunks.
Facey is one of the keys to success or lack of this year.
We really have no one else.
The choices are a skinny freshman 2-3 or a muscular freshman ,who I believe is over his head.
If we actually had a back up five we could rotate Nolan , but he is far to valuable at the 5 .
Facey is one of the keys to success or lack of this year.
We really have no one else.
The choices are a skinny freshman 2-3 or a muscular freshman ,who I believe is over his head.
If we actually had a back up five we could rotate Nolan , but he is far to valuable at the 5 .
Here's what I put in another thread:I don't see needing 10 to 12 from Facey. 5 sounds about right.
The bulk of our scoring will come from the 1-3 spots, and hopefully Amida will be effective on put backs and dunks.
Damn if we are relying on Facey to get us to the promise land this year .. gonna be a long season
I guess my impression is that a lot of people are saying this. That Giffey and DD were so great the entire year that there was just no way to get him on the court, and I don't agree with that. If he came in playing at a Josh Boone level he would have played, and Giffey and DD just would have played less. We didn't have that option because he wasn't good enough out of the gate.
Yes dad, i'll keep that in mindyes, because that's exactly what people are saying in this thread. you should sit this one out.