ESPN Top 10 NBA Players of All Time Mistake | Page 4 | The Boneyard

ESPN Top 10 NBA Players of All Time Mistake

Are we pretending players didn't need to adjust to playing with MJ too?

No, where'd you get that from?

But for giggles, which All-Stars teamed up with MJ and in turn had to take on a reduced roll? Not just in involvement but in how they played the game?
 
LeBron has one of the best minds ever, but this dude is either trolling really hard or just someone who likes to spout completely unprovable statements.

Based on his avy it's pretty clear he's trolling but in the middle of this quarantine I'm bored out of my mind and more than willing to play with a troll lol.
 
Well, that wasn't what we were responding to. MJ has nothing to do with that.
No, where'd you get that from?

But for giggles, which All-Stars teamed up with MJ and in turn had to take on a reduced roll? Not just in involvement but in how they played the game?
Because it's an MJ/LeBron discussion and it seemed like you were implying LeBron is unique in that other stars take lesser roles to play with him
 
Because it's an MJ/LeBron discussion and it seemed like you were implying LeBron is unique in that other stars take lesser roles to play with him
Do you have someone blocked? We were specifically responding to someone who said "No player in the history of the NBA has made his teammates better than Lebron has."
 
.-.
Do you have someone blocked? We were specifically responding to someone who said "No player in the history of the NBA has made his teammates better than Lebron has."
Don't have him blocked, I just took his post to be LeBron vs MJ since it was responding to a post about MJ being the best. But maybe that's not what he was saying
 
Don't have him blocked, I just took his post to be LeBron vs MJ since it was responding to a post about MJ being the best. But maybe that's not what he was saying
If your argument is that LeBron is the best because nobody was better at making his teammates better and I can point out reasons why that isn't even remotely true, it undercuts his points without reference to Jordan.

The Jordan vs. LeBron debate there gets complicated. Certainly LeBron is a better passer, but it's impossible to quantify what having someone like Jordan does for everyone. We know that about Curry, for instance. You can't leave the guy alone and, regardless of how good a passer he is, everyone on the court is better because of him. Steve Kerr got wide open shots because of Jordan and, later, Duncan. Both of those guys were made Kerr way better.
 
Nope.

Jordan career 3P% - 32.7% Playoffs - 33.2%
James career 3P% - 34.4% Playoffs - 33.2%
Jordan 3 P% .327
Lebron 3P% 344
 
If you argument is that LeBron is the best because nobody was better at making his teammates better and I can point out reasons why that isn't even remotely true, it undercuts his points without reference to Jordan.

The Jordan vs. LeBron debate there gets complicated. Certainly LeBron is a better passer, but it's impossible to quantify what having someone like Jordan does for everyone. We know that about Curry, for instance. You can't leave the guy alone and, regardless of how good a passer he is, everyone on the court is better because of him. Steve Kerr got wide open shots because of Jordan and, later, Duncan. Both of those guys were made Kerr way better.
I'm not even saying LeBron is better than MJ. I won't even try to delve into who made their teammates better between the 2 because I couldn't tell you anything about anyone Jordan played with outside of about 3 players
 
Lebron is great he will always have an argument to be a Top 2,3 whatever. But he would've easily been the games biggest whiner (may be anyway) ever had he played back when Michael played that's a no brainer. The more I have a chance to watch the '84 Celts stuff, the Pistons stuff and Michaels stuff because there's nothing on I can't believe how hard and physical they played in comparison to todays game. Watching a C's game vs the Hawks and Kevin Willis guarding McHale and Wilkins guarding Larry as they are both backing people in and getting physically hammered while doing so, it was crazy tough basketball in those days. No reviews for hard fouls like today with pansy crap it as basketball. To win it all you had to be really really tough mentally and physically for 40 minutes a game.

I mean it's Michael as to who #1 is and it's not really close.
Its funny how you think Michael would be able to adjust his 3 pt shooting to fit with this era but no way Lebron would be able to adjust his "whining" or "toughness" playing in that era.

You guys crack me up.
 
.-.
Jordan 3 P% .327
Lebron 3P% 344
So, they shot roughly the same percentage during the regular season, and exactly the same during the playoffs.

And one guy rarely practiced 3s and the other played over half his career in a league that valued 3s above everything else. I don't get what you think this does to help the LeBron is better argument.
 
So, they shot roughly the same percentage during the regular season, and exactly the same during the playoffs.

And one guy rarely practiced 3s and the other played over half his career in a league that valued 3s above everything else. I don't get what you think this does to help the LeBron is better argument.
Well almost 2% is a big difference.
 
LeBron has one of the best minds ever, but this dude is either trolling really hard or just someone who likes to spout completely unprovable statements.

Well, if you were a sixth grader and had no more school work to do from home today, what would you do?
 
So, they shot roughly the same percentage during the regular season, and exactly the same during the playoffs.

And one guy rarely practiced 3s and the other played over half his career in a league that valued 3s above everything else. I don't get what you think this does to help the LeBron is better argument.
?

Lebron has a lot more attempts and still had a higher success rate. If you can do a job more often than the next man while being more successful, that means you are better than him doing that thing.
 
Well almost 2% is a big difference.
It isn't.

If two players take 100 threes, and one makes 40, while the other makes 38, are you going to tell your team that they don't have to close out on the 38% shooter as hard as the 40% shooter?

Over the course of a season, 2% could mean the difference between winning a losing a few games. It's not unimportant, but it isn't a "big difference". You literally can't get much smaller than 1-2% difference.

In practice, 2% isn't going to change the way the defense approaches a player. A guy who shoots 38% from three needs to be accounted for in the same manner as a guy who shoots 40%. You won't ignore someone over that 2%.
 
.-.
It isn't.

If two players take 100 threes, and one makes 40, while the other makes 38, are you going to tell your team that they don't have to close out on the 38% shooter as hard as the 40% shooter?

Over the course of a season, 2% could mean the difference between winning a losing a few games. It's not unimportant, but it isn't a "big difference". You literally can't get much smaller than 1-2% difference.

In practice, 2% isn't going to change the way the defense approaches a player. A guy who shoots 38% from three needs to be accounted for in the same manner as a guy who shoots 40%. You won't ignore someone over that 2%.
That is just such a naive and watered down take that I don’t really know how to respond.
 
To be fair none of that disproves his point. LeBron got his friends paid, Jordan would have killed Thompson himself if it meant 1 more win
He didn't make Tristan a better player. He made him more money. There's a difference. So it does disprove his argument that nobody in the history of the NBA made their teammates "better" like Lebron, when his argument is that Tristan Thompson got a max contract because of Lebron.

He didn't get a max contract, and the contract he did get was due to a number of factors, none of which were "Tristan Thompson is worth a max contract because Lebron made him into a player worthy of a max contract"
 
Last edited:
He didn't make Tristan a better player. He made him more money. There's a difference. So it does disprove his argument that nobody in the history of the NBA made their teammates "better" like Lebron, when his argument is that Tristan Thompson got a max contract because of Lebron.

He didn't get a max contract, and the contract he did get was due to a number of factors, none of which were "Tristan Thompson is worthy a max contract because Lebron made him into a player worthy of a max contract"
Oh I know, I was just making a joke that in his post he never said LeBron made Tristan Thompson a good player, just made him money
 
.-.
?

Lebron has a lot more attempts and still had a higher success rate. If you can do a job more often than the next man while being more successful, that means you are better than him doing that thing.
Again, he has more attempts because that's what offenses demanded. And if offenses demanded this then, Jordan would have been much better at it: he learned to shoot in the NBA. It's like saying baseball players are worse hitters than in the past because their averages are lower. It ignores so much.

EDIT: LeBron is a freak. He'd have adapted just fine to what 80s/90s offenses wanted. That's not the point.
 
Oh I know, I was just making a joke that in his post he never said LeBron made Tristan Thompson a good player, just made him money
hahaha Lebron 5th now thats funny. Lebron has the greatest basketball mind to ever play the game. No player in the history of the NBA has made his teammates better than Lebron has.
 
Oscar Robertson and Russell Westbrook are the only 2 who have even averaged a triple double for a season, and both are well below that for their career
Robertson also set yardsticks in versatility. If his first five NBA seasons are strung together, Robertson averaged a triple-double over those, averaging 30.3 points, 10.4 rebounds and 10.6 assists. For his career, Robertson had 181 triple-doubles, a record that has never been approached.
 
Again, he has more attempts because that's what offenses demanded. And if offenses demanded this then, Jordan would have been much better at it: he learned to shoot in the NBA. It's like saying baseball players are worse hitters than in the past because their averages are lower. It ignores so much.

EDIT: LeBron is a freak. He'd have adapted just fine to what 80s/90s offenses wanted. That's not the point.
Shooting is arguably the hardest part of the game to consistently improve. MJ may very have been a good 3pt shooter in this time, but as it stands he wasn’t a very good one. LeBron isn’t anything special but he has become a 3pt threat.
 
Yet no one ever considers Oscar when discussing Goats
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,215
Messages
4,557,559
Members
10,442
Latest member
StatsMan


Top Bottom