2025 Recruiting: - Eric Reibe Official Visit | Page 3 | The Boneyard

2025 Recruiting: Eric Reibe Official Visit

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think you could see Stewart break out, but not to the level of lottery pick Jordan Hawkins. I think you can reasonably expect 10+ ppg in either a starting, or 6th man role. The first round leap might come in his junior season.
 
View attachment 102956Clearly you are part of the JStew fan club. That’s a lot of confidence for a kid that only started seeing real minutes towards the back half. He only played 4 minutes in the NC, 7 against Bama. Had no stats in either game. Not a rebound.

I’ll take your bet - 100 bucks the opposite of your guarantees happen.
I'm not as high on Stewart as he is but this is a hilarious way to frame a freshman getting minutes in the biggest games possible for one of the best college teams of all time.
 
I was thinking Mahaney/McNeeley/Stewart/Karaban/Reed would be our second most likely lineup. My guess is Hass starts over Stewart, but I really have np confidence in that.

We're so deep, feels like at least 9 guys could start and not surprise me.
To me the easy call for Hurley is to have McNeeley come off the bench. It's super easy to sell him on playing starters minutes coming in for Stewart, who is also a very good player, has paid his dues for a year, and honestly is going to be better defensively at the start of the season than McNeeley anyway. McNeeley can still close games, and he's been in the NBA pipeline for years playing on the FIBA teams, so it's not going to effect his NBA stock at all to come off the bench. It's just way more logical in a situation where you have a bunch of guys all good enough to start.
 
Been around for way longer than 2011. Where is that old battle ax Fishy these days anyway?

Been a die hard home grown Husky fan since I was a kid late 80s, good chunk of the family Alum. The Ollie years and AAC were hard to watch. Like an oncoming accident you hope sorts itself out while not looking, for something you grew up with so much pride in. I guess everyone treats sports trauma differently. Hurley has created a lot of renewed enthusiasm obviously and reinvented the program into something so amazing it’s hard to believe sometimes.

As a former professional athlete, I don’t wear rose colored glasses 24-7. I know some here do, and expect everyone else to. I just don’t find it objective, or interesting ;).
Thanks. So did you not post for a long time? So the success the team had with Hurley brought you back? I'm just wondering how you didn't post for so long and why compared to how much you're posting now. Were you reading the Boneyard and just not posting? I post a decent amount and I can't imagine reading the board and not posting at all.
 
.-.
We don’t even know if he’s starting. Most prognostications have him coming off the bench in favor of McNeeley. He’s a talented kid but I think most are highly over blowing his draft stock. I’d be surprised if he goes this year and I don’t mind being wrong. He had some very mini flashes last year, but I still see him as a raw product.

Hawk was a core starter and center of offense. Agree that the jump can happen at any point but I don’t even know what his strength is at this point. What I know is it isn’t his jump shot/3, as he shot 21% last year and that was after getting hot-ish towards end of year. Having been at the open practice I can see why in his release. I honestly don’t know why anyone can be “shocked” if he’s back.
Who are these prognosticators?

I gave a strong suspicion that as a whole they are doing little more than guessing.
 
I'm not as high on Stewart as he is but this is a hilarious way to frame a freshman getting minutes in the biggest games possible for one of the best college teams of all time.
Sent his season stats and another poster shared his overall tourney stats, a tourney where we blew out opponents every game, except for Bama.

In 21 minutes between the Illinois and NW games, he scored 2 points and had 1 rebound. Across the season he averaged 9 minutes per game and averaged 2 points and 1 rebound, shot 20.7% from 3.

He had a really nice breakout game against Marquette in the BE final, and 1-2 other nice games the entire remainder of the year. I get it, fans get excited. I really like the kid, just haven’t seen anything yet to anoint him an auto 1st round draft pick. Feels like it’s based purely on hopeful speculation and one game. 95% chance he’s back junior year. Happy to eat crow on that one.
 
Thanks. So did you not post for a long time? So the success the team had with Hurley brought you back? I'm just wondering how you didn't post for so long and why compared to how much you're posting now. Were you reading the Boneyard and just not posting? I post a decent amount and I can't imagine reading the board and not posting at all.
Variety of life factors, multiple business’, etc and was honestly following more realignment stuff at the time than hoops as kinda knew the future of the program really depended on getting out of the AAC. Ollie was on a clear downward trajectory. I’d consider myself a prideful spoiled fan as watched JC build this thing from nothing to the apex, to then see it flushed away. It was hard to watch. I’m beyond grateful for Hurley.
 
Thanks. So did you not post for a long time? So the success the team had with Hurley brought you back? I'm just wondering how you didn't post for so long and why compared to how much you're posting now. Were you reading the Boneyard and just not posting? I post a decent amount and I can't imagine reading the board and not posting at all.
not uncommon, I read for years before I posted. Retired and bored, the Yard is a hobby now, lotsa fun!
 
Most prognostications are dumb then if they don't have him starting. He's going to start, and he's going to be a 1st round pick. This conversation is going to look dumb in a few months. I honestly don't know what you were watching based on your comments on Stewart, it certainly wasn't any of the UConn basketball games last year
What??? Listen, you may be proven right, but to think that he WILL definitely go from fringe rotation player to the NBA is more crazy than thinking that he will take an extra year to work on his game. This topic must be read in conjunction with how incredibly deep we are. It wouldn’t be a shame on him to back up Liam and Alex. Your take is too radical.
 
there's more way to get drafted than college production. it's really about talent.
 
.-.
The starter tag will be less important on the upcoming version of the Huskies squad than just about any in recent memory. Other than Karaban, I’d be surprised if anyone averaged over 30 minutes a game. There should be a bunch of guys averaging 15-25 minutes a game, imo. There should be a lot of opportunities for guys to shine and handle different roles.
 
Thanks. So did you not post for a long time? So the success the team had with Hurley brought you back? I'm just wondering how you didn't post for so long and why compared to how much you're posting now. Were you reading the Boneyard and just not posting? I post a decent amount and I can't imagine reading the board and not posting at all.
I followed the board for 10-15 years and never posted for what its worth
 
What??? Listen, you may be proven right, but to think that he WILL definitely go from fringe rotation player to the NBA is more crazy than thinking that he will take an extra year to work on his game. This topic must be read in conjunction with how incredibly deep we are. It wouldn’t be a shame on him to back up Liam and Alex. Your take is too radical.
It's not radical when he's already being mocked in the 1st round and is being mentioned as one of the top sophomores to watch for the NBA in multiple articles already
 
To me the easy call for Hurley is to have McNeeley come off the bench. It's super easy to sell him on playing starters minutes coming in for Stewart, who is also a very good player, has paid his dues for a year, and honestly is going to be better defensively at the start of the season than McNeeley anyway. McNeeley can still close games, and he's been in the NBA pipeline for years playing on the FIBA teams, so it's not going to effect his NBA stock at all to come off the bench. It's just way more logical in a situation where you have a bunch of guys all good enough to start.
Narratively, I think you're right that this is cleanest.

But if McNeeley is one of our best players in actual practice, I don't think you can start Stewart over him. All the guys will know who is playing best and that's antithetical to the culture.

Tea leaf reading suggests McNeeley is definitely going to be one of our better players (Hurley moving summer practice allocations to accommodate his injury is a big tea leaf reading <!!!>), and his tape is some of the best I've ever watched for a high school player fitting into a college system day 1 as a high level complementary player. But to be honest even parsing every morsel super closely (and the open practice tape/feedback) I don't really have any clue which of the 2 of them (or Mahaney if we're including the 2G) has an edge to start.
 
It's not radical when he's already being mocked in the 1st round and is being mentioned as one of the top sophomores to watch for the NBA in multiple articles already
Can you please share all these mocks and NBA circle articles about Stewart? I’ve seen one mock with him at pick 30, by Sam V. Would love to read more about this.
 
.-.
Can you please share all these mocks and NBA circle articles about Stewart? I’ve seen one mock with him at pick 30, by Sam V. Would love to read more about this.
There's a thread somewhere on here with all the mock drafts and all that in one spot. The ESPN article is here, I think there was another one from Rivals or 247 or something too. It was a few months ago so don't remember what site

 
Mahaney, Stewart, Karaban are locks to start in my eyes. If McNeeley can handle playing the 2 spot he probably starts over Ball there. No idea at the 5 spot.

I recognize it may be bold, I just don't see any way Stewart doesn't start even with all the talent we have
The reason Stewart probably doesn't start is because McNeeley is better than him and I doubt we start three 6'7ish players.
 
The reason Stewart probably doesn't start is because McNeeley is better than him and I doubt we start three 6'7ish players.
Don't some mocks have McNeeley going this year? Too talented not to start
 
Agreed it'll be Stewart or McNeeley. Stewart may have an edge because we need an athletic wing defender, and he's probably not that far behind McNeeley offensively, in a vacuum.

I'm going to take it as a great sign if McNeeley does start, because that probably means he's far too gifted offensively to bench, aka our next lottery pick. But I will be watching how we defend gifted scoring wings with that lineup.
 
Agreed it'll be Stewart or McNeeley. Stewart may have an edge because we need an athletic wing defender, and he's probably not that far behind McNeeley offensively, in a vacuum.

I'm going to take it as a great sign if McNeeley does start, because that probably means he's far too gifted offensively to bench, aka our next lottery pick. But I will be watching how we defend gifted scoring wings with that lineup.
i thought Diarra did a great job tag-teaming w/ Castle on Shannon. maybe i'm misremembering that but we arent going to be playing many wings as good as him anyways. maybe Edgecombe or Ian Jackson but they arent as big as Shannon. i'm confident in Diarra being our lockdown perimeter defender against anyone but a stretch 4, e.g., cade tyson, momcilovic, etc.
 
.-.
Don't some mocks have McNeeley going this year? Too talented not to start

Reed Sheppard went third overall in the draft and wasn’t a starter last season.

(Before Navery responds and tries to be a you know what I realize he started 5 games out of the 33 they played)

Kemba didn’t start as a freshman
Andre didn’t start as a freshman
Hawkins didn’t start as a freshman…
 
Reed Sheppard went third overall in the draft and wasn’t a starter last season.

(Before Navery responds and tries to be a you know what I realize he started 5 games out of the 33 they played)

Kemba didn’t start as a freshman
Andre didn’t start as a freshman
Hawkins didn’t start as a freshman…
What do Kemba, Andre, and Hawkins have to do with this?
 
I think he means a lot of talented players that then played in the league didn’t start as freshman and used them as examples.
None of them were one and done projected lottery picks before their freshmen season started.
 
None of them were one and done projected lottery picks before their freshmen season started.

Reed was one and done. I also listed a few UConn examples of talented freshman who didn’t start as freshman.

I don’t have the 2009 and 2021 nba pre season mock drafts memorized like you do but please share so I can familiarize myself. Thx
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,556
Messages
4,582,782
Members
10,492
Latest member
7774Forever


Top Bottom