intlzncster
i fart in your general direction
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 29,091
- Reaction Score
- 60,514
Free sex is free sex.
Can't refute this.
Free sex is free sex.
You are wrong
Fast strong hands. Big body. And he could move ... Not lumbering. He did have one impressive game blocking out & rebounding against Meier of Houston. His offense looked promising.
But ... you have to lean towards the explanation that he wasn't responding to Coaching. Because he looked awful a lot.
Redshirt program was made for him. Like Gonzaga has done repeatedly. But from the stands ... you'd have to say that there was a simple disconnect. There is a good possibility that he never will get it.
He didn't have trouble guarding bigs, he was worse than that. Enoch may go to Louisville, but unless something miraculous happens over the year he sits out, his role there won't be any different than here.Somehow I have a visual image in my head of Enoch trying to execute on D in Tricky Ricky's full court press. It's not a pretty picture.
This guy had trouble trying to guard fairly stationary bigs in the paint, and the lane was an open freeway to the hoop every time he entered a game. Attempting to play in Pitino's pressing D will make his head explode.
Rick Pitino seems to think he's good enough to take up a scholarship for the next three years - Pitino's pretty good at this sort of thing, so perhaps we're wrong and Enoch actually has potential.
But Louisville likes him!...so... it's Oregon!Enoch shot 29.7% in the toughest games of the season (A+B games in KenPom) and rebounded less of available defensive rebounds while he was in those game than Christian Vital.
It doesn't really matter what Pitino thinks. We saw him for two years and not once did he show he can play impactful minutes on both sides of the floor.We need to wait and see. He may never develop anywhere and the staff will look just fine. I think he will end up as a good player, and he would have here, but I don't think Louisville giving him an offer means much more than taking a flyer on a huge guy who was highly ranked in HS. Those rankings tend to carry some weight even after the player enrolls.
It doesn't really matter what Pitino thinks. We saw him for two years and not once did he show he can play impactful minutes on both sides of the floor.
It doesn't really matter what Pitino thinks. We saw him for two years and not once did he show he can play impactful minutes on both sides of the floor.
Yeah, but...
1. could he play D? Which is the more important question.
2. that's comparing him to Brimah. lol not the highest of bars there.
3. Didn't seem to be able to translate practice play to game play.
LOL - You just don't get it. Jim is a loyal man and doesn't agree with me that Glen couldn't coach Bigs. Agree to disagree on that as they say.So either you're saying you really don't know what refute means, or you are saying that you know how to coach basketball better than. Jimmy C?
I can assure you Calhoun would refute my assessment of Glen Miller's Bigs Coaching.
Brimah did nothing to continue starting at center over someone with talent. We're going to pay in the long run for it.
He gave us a better chance to win games this year. That's the only reason you play is to try and win the game. Otherwise, why bother?
Rick Pitino seems to think he's good enough to take up a scholarship for the next three years - Pitino's pretty good at this sort of thing, so perhaps we're wrong and Enoch actually has potential.
Calhoun would have turned that kid into a lottery pick!I feel like many never played on a team. Enoch got minutes and opportunity. And UConn - with Brimah and Facey - had opportunities through mid February to exceed where they actually ended up. I AM a big proponent of Steve Enoch's potential. Unfortunately, that kid showed that he couldn't sustain a winning post effort in the last 6 weeks of the season. And I am going to bet that paralleled what he did in practice. I back Ollie in what was a key 2016-2017 development. You nudge Enoch ... but you are not doing your Program nor Steven Enoch any good giving him minutes beyond what he has proven is his. A 20 minute Enoch allotment only should have come with better performance on defense/rebounding and in practice daily. Calhoun would have eaten that kid up.
We realized we needed to win the AACT to go dancing in January/February. Why he didn't get reps despite fouls and poor defense is beyond me. Even when we were up in games by 15+ he was still on the pine in favor of Brimah.Most pints here are valid.
I still would have liked to see Enoch get more minutes last year.
Painful to watch minutes as a fan and most likely infuriating to watch as a coach.
But I would have liked him to get all those minutes. Even if he fouled out in 14 minutes.
I wanted to see him get reps.
Simply put, the kid looked absolutely lost on the court. Maybe that's some coaching (and I've been very critical of Ollie and co.) but there is just a certain innate basketball IQ that some guys either have or don't.
If Enoch showed 1 "plus" characteristic besides his frame I think he could amount to something, but I just don't see it.