Emmitt Matthews Jr Commits to UConn | Page 8 | The Boneyard

Emmitt Matthews Jr Commits to UConn

Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
1,419
Reaction Score
5,492
Well TL will definitely see some time at PF this year like he did last year. Either way I think EM is being groomed more as a 3 as his handle doesn't seem tight enough to play 2 at UCONN. He might see some spot minutes at the 2 and the 4 but I see him more of a 3. I think Sid Willson will play the 4 when they are in together. That is why I think we can still sell JC on playing the 2 and some 1 here at UCONN.

Exactly. Thanks for proving my point WingU!
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
1,419
Reaction Score
5,492
Gentlemen - is there any other reason than "having to be right" that you are getting pissy with each other with this argument about whether Mr. Matthews will be a 2, 3 or 4 here at UConn?

Our head coach has said over and over and over again... he wants players that are versatile and can play multiple positions depending upon situations and matchups within each game to execute his schemes. Matthews' game fits the mold of proto-typical Kevin Ollie player. That is seemingly a great thing for our program's future.

Why would you be stubborn about an argument that has no basis in fact based upon what our coach has said and done for 5 years whenever he had the players and versatility to execute his schemes?

For example: WingU-Conn, you tend to make good points in other threads... so why would you continue to argue that Matthews will never play the 4, when we all saw Niels Giffey play the 5, even in a National Championship game?
"Matthews is never going to play the 4." I will take the other side of that and all but guarantee that at some point Matthews will be playing the 4 in a game... in addition to the 2 and 3. I base that on the only thing that should really count: proof of actual games coached by KO.


Better to speculate on all the different combinations that KO and staff might come up with to best utilize this young man's blossoming talents once he is here, don't you think? Much more fun, too.

Agreed. This is why I defended the original poster who was getting crushed for saying he'd play more 4 than 2. He may be wrong, but everyone was acting like it was an insane thing to say.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
5,524
Reaction Score
14,000

Vance Jackson and his father were a head case. They would never be happy here it seemed.

The college game has changed as there are players that play the PF with Larrier's size. I mean look at Villanova year in and year out with undersized 4's. I bet you TL plays more than a few minutes at the 4 this year with a small lineup at times. It will be a big advantage to us scoring points if we can go small. We have him and Williams Polley and hopefully Wilson who are interchangeable at the 3 or 4. I don't think we will have this defined 4 like Diarra who I can see playing center at times. I think with our present talent , hoping that Wilson can play immediately, we just have a better lineup going small this year. None of our bigs can really play together as they just don't have the offensive skills to do so or are too young right now.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
34,053
Reaction Score
99,451

Partially right but not completely. I mean there may be times they will play "small" because they need to score the ball and maybe the new front court is a bit short on offensive ability right? Tough even for a great trio like AG, JA and TL to get open space with 2 guys who can't score the ball so only at times and certain match ups could we see maybe 3 guards and Terry with a Cobb or alike or even 2 guars, Polley and Terry with a 5.

But we do need to be able to put 2 big rebounding bodies out there most often to be really effective I agree.
 
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
2,985
Reaction Score
9,300
I don't think we'll being seeing much Matthews at the 4. I have faith in the future of the UConn front court. I think Mamadou and Carlton are both going to be really good. Williams may take some getting used to D1 but I think he will give us great energy, rebounding, and jumping ability at the 4. Whaley will take a year or two but I could see him averaging 10 and 8 before he graduates. Matthews will likely split his time between the 2 and 3.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
5,524
Reaction Score
14,000
I don't think we'll being seeing much Matthews at the 4. I have faith in the future of the UConn front court. I think Mamadou and Carlton are both going to be really good. Williams may take some getting used to D1 but I think he will give us great energy, rebounding, and jumping ability at the 4. Whaley will take a year or two but I could see him averaging 10 and 8 before he graduates. Matthews will likely split his time between the 2 and 3.
I think we have no idea how any our bigs are going to do. It really is a crapshoot as we have no sure thing up front. That is why predicting a lineup with this many question marks going into the season is not worth it. The only people we have an idea on are JA, , CV while to a lesser extent AG and TL. That is why you see alot of posters going with the small lineup because at least we have an idea these players can score which has been our Achilles heel the last few years. Playing with two non scoring bigs last year was crippling at times.
 

ctchamps

We are UConn!! 6 >>>1!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
17,446
Reaction Score
44,225
Partially right but not completely. I mean there may be times they will play "small" because they need to score the ball and maybe the new front court is a bit short on offensive ability right? Tough even for a great trio like AG, JA and TL to get open space with 2 guys who can't score the ball so only at times and certain match ups could we see maybe 3 guards and Terry with a Cobb or alike or even 2 guars, Polley and Terry with a 5.

But we do need to be able to put 2 big rebounding bodies out there most often to be really effective I agree.
Exactly. If KO utilizes TL at the 4 because he wants to go small and create match up problems like the 2014 terrific. If he plays TL at the 4 because none of the bigs are decent we can be in trouble.
 
Joined
Sep 2, 2011
Messages
1,638
Reaction Score
17,273
Not saying they aren’t out there, but does anyone have a link in which it states Matthews has grown to 6’9? I haven’t seen it, but a few people have mentioned it.

The 6'9 statement comes from a Washington State high school coach that KansasHusky reported on Sept 19th in the other Emmitt Mathews thread. I tried to link that quote with yours in this reply, but evidently I'm too technologically challenged
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
9,523
Reaction Score
35,250
Larrier, Polley and Williams could all play some 4. The determining factor will be matchups and most importantly, if one of them turns out to be a great rebounder. Much easier to play a small 4 with offensive skills if he plays good D and has a nose for the ball. I suspect KO actually does see the roster as 5's, PGs, and everyone else. From there it will be situational.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Messages
2,286
Reaction Score
15,475
The 6'9 statement comes from a Washington State high school coach that KansasHusky reported on Sept 19th in the other Emmitt Mathews thread. I tried to link that quote with yours in this reply, but evidently I'm too technologically challenged

That was from me. To make my wording clear, he is 6'7 now, but growing and supposed to top out at 6'9. He was 6'4 last March.
 
Joined
Jan 30, 2015
Messages
4,288
Reaction Score
35,631
The 6'9 statement comes from a Washington State high school coach that KansasHusky reported on Sept 19th in the other Emmitt Mathews thread. I tried to link that quote with yours in this reply, but evidently I'm too technologically challenged
That was from me. To make my wording clear, he is 6'7 now, but growing and supposed to top out at 6'9. He was 6'4 last March.
Thanks boys
 
Joined
Apr 27, 2017
Messages
422
Reaction Score
1,582
Larrier, Polley and Williams could all play some 4. The determining factor will be matchups and most importantly, if one of them turns out to be a great rebounder. Much easier to play a small 4 with offensive skills if he plays good D and has a nose for the ball. I suspect KO actually does see the roster as 5's, PGs, and everyone else. From there it will be situational.

Williams will play the 4 because he is a 4
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,526
Reaction Score
37,257
Exactly. If KO utilizes TL at the 4 because he wants to go small and create match up problems like the 2014 terrific. If he plays TL at the 4 because none of the bigs are decent we can be in trouble.

It will probably be a little of column A and a little of column B.

There is a not-insignificant chance that, at least this year, zero of our frontcourt players (Cobb, Carlton, Onuorah, Whaley, Diarra, Williams) are UConn-caliber. The law of probabilities is in our favor that not all of them are busts, but who of that group do you look at and say "yup, that's the guy"?
 

nomar

#1 Casual Fan™
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,169
Reaction Score
45,954
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,514
Reaction Score
4,984
Joined
Dec 7, 2016
Messages
2,152
Reaction Score
16,005
Everybody knows UConn. It's a storied program. Shabazz [Napier] holding his jersey up, telling everybody, 'I told you so.'

Yeah, this is the main quote I was thinking of. How do you watch that on TV as a young basketball player and not want to come play for UConn? Love that it resonated with Matthews.
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
2,443
Reaction Score
9,001
Wait, I thought today's recruits didn't even know who Shabazz was?
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
17,204
Reaction Score
27,580
You say you don't see a frontcourt as thin as when Giffey played. How do we know this? Out frontcourt could be good but to my knowledge no one has played yet and Larrier and Diarra are coming off injuries.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
17,204
Reaction Score
27,580
It's funny, I look at that lineup of Brimah, Nolan , Olander and Facey and I wonder how, but Daniels was pretty talented and anything can happen.
 

Online statistics

Members online
306
Guests online
2,623
Total visitors
2,929

Forum statistics

Threads
161,225
Messages
4,255,280
Members
10,098
Latest member
Hillside


.
Top Bottom