- Joined
- Aug 17, 2011
- Messages
- 16,344
- Reaction Score
- 92,567
If Hurley wants him, then I want him. I think Hurley has shown a good eye for talent and he seems to know exactly what he wants in his players. So....bring him aboard.
This is what I was saying. I went to Fairfield and used to watch MAAC games a lot. The level of competition is no where near what the NBE is. It doesn't even compare to the American. Not necessarily saying its not a possibility he could perform, but its def not a sure thing his game will translate.Has anyone actually watched games of his? MAAC to Big East is a big jump.
A lot of people talking about how covid19 affects recruiting. Although it definitely does, the good coaches will be able to use it to their advantage. Can't forget that everyone is effected by the pandemic the same way.The looming transfer rule and covid 19 situation is having a huge impact on recruiting. The transfer rule seemed like it was going to be passed through, now there seems to be a lot of uncertainty. Not sure it’s worth waiting to find out, I’m not confident in anything that the NCAA will do or how long it may take. Don’t love the idea of taking a player that will have to sit for a year.
Kelly was second team all-MAAC and he’s playing in the ACC. This kid was a unanimous first team selection.This is what I was saying. I went to Fairfield and used to watch MAAC games a lot. The level of competition is no where near what the NBE is. It doesn't even compare to the American. Not necessarily saying its not a possibility he could perform, but its def not a sure thing his game will translate.
Respectfully disagree. He could be here, or not. I'm less confident that we woulda probably seen what his future looks like.Also don’t believe Sid is leaving. We woulda probably seen by now. His social media doesn’t make it seem like he is. That’s gold though, I want him around.
Kelly?Kelly was second team all-MAAC and he’s playing in the ACC. This kid was a unanimous first team selection.
He's talking about Rich Kelly from Quinnipiac who just said he's transferring to BC. Weird he would bring up a player who has never played a second in the ACC.Kelly?
56% FT?Vs p6 comp over 3 years.
Providence -- 7/3/0, 3 TO, 0 STL, 1 BLK. 3/6 FG. 1/1 3FG. 0/0 FT.
PSU -- 16/7/0 2TO, 1 STL, 0 BLK. 6/9 FG. 2/5 3FG. ⅔ FT.
Oregon -- 25/6/2 0 TO, 2 STL, 3 BLK. 11/21 FG. ¼ 3FG. ⅔ FT.
UCF -- 14/5/0 1 TO 0 STL 0 BLK 6/9 FG. ½ 3FG. ¼ FT
WVU -- 11/8/3 2 TO 4 STL 1 BLK 4/11 FG ⅓ 3FG ⅔ FT
ASU -- 8/10/0 6 TO 0 STL 1 BLK 3/8FG 0/3 3FG ⅔ FT
Temple -- 11/10/0 4 TO 1 STL 1 BLK 5/15 FG 1/3 3FG 0/0 FT
Wiscy -- 7/8/2 3 TO 0 STL 1 BLK 3/8 FG 0/1 3FG ½ FT
Average:
12.4 PTS
7.1 REB
0.9 AST
2.6 TO
1.0 STL
1.0 BLK
47% FG
32% 3FG (2.8 attempts per)
56% FT (2.5 attempts per)
Don't love the AST and TO numbers. But he would be a great addition regardless. We need tough, physical defenders.
In that small sample yes. 71% for his career56% FT?
56% FT?
Can’t assume the rule change anymore. The pro change momentum totally died once they pushed the date back. Most people on other boards seem to believe the rule will NOT change now. At least not this year.Assuming the transfer rule changes, would players like Nolley and Murphy be turned off by the addition of an established big guard? Lots of competition for playing time in this scenario.
We are in good shape with Vaughn. Not saying it is sealed but the staff think they will land him.
We are in good shape with Vaughn. Not saying it is sealed but the staff think they will land him.
That's a copy and paste from an e-mail. Now who was the e-mail from is the question? Credible source?I've always thought a poster's credibility correlated strongly with their font size. Don't let me down.