Nika, Dorka also.I think they’re showing you that Ducharme didn’t play and Azzi was limited because the game following that is when her foot injury absences began.
Nice opinion. Which of the all powerful SEC really scare you?Still think SC is the better overall team. I think UCONN is improved but some of these latest wins are against subpar opponents.
A key the officials need to stop protecting Boston.Double-teaming Boston and boxing her and SC out is the key. SC kills you on offensive rebounds. I’m hoping it’s a tightly called game and the refs aren’t afraid to call Boston for over the back fouls.
Boston is a good defender too especially if she can get set on defense. UConn bigs (Liv, I’m talking to you) need to put up a shot quickly before she can prepare to defend, you’ll get fouled most likely.
Christyn had one of her best offensive games yesterday. Love it, she wants a championship this year.
Keep healing Caroline! Would love to see her roaming around inside more, with her height and around the basket mobility, I think she can cause havoc. She’ll get her outside shot back, if not, Paige and Azzi (and Christyn and Evina, heck, maybe Nika will score a couple of baskets) will snipe away.
So, smother Boston, grab those rebounds, and fire away!
There is a path for Connecticut to beat South Carolina, it’s incredible talent and good coaching notwithstanding, but it isn’t relying on Paige to out rebound South Carolina’s front court.UConn has a kid name Paige who won every awards in her freshman year. If she is healthy this year, she will be a stud on the boards.
And she is improving her injury everyday now.
SC with the # 1 D in the nation won't let Uconn see too many open 3'sI hope we get to see a rematch with SC but as others have pointed out there's a whole lot of basketball to be played before that can happen.............if UConn is shooting well from three in the hopeful rematch the odds are they win........if they shoot poorly from the outside the odds are SC wins......it's as simple as that........
If UConn is as good as Missouri we can beat South Carolina.There is a path for Connecticut to beat South Carolina, it’s incredible talent and good coaching notwithstanding, but it isn’t relying on Paige to out rebound South Carolina’s front court.
the story, thus far.all those players played in the 1st meeting Sc, you know the one where SC held Uconn to 7 pt in the 4th?
Yeah, I don’t know if it’s quite that simple.If UConn is as good as Missouri they can beat South Carolina.
I have great respect for SC's defense, but I don't think they've have seen another team with this kind of outside firepower running on all cylinders this season........It's going to be a battle........... if SC overplays Bueckers, CW, Fudd, Westbrook or Ducharme you know they can dribble drive, take the midrange jumper or draw out Boston and the other bigs leaving ONO, Edwards and Dorka free inside.......of course I want UConn driving on Boston and friends all night long to get them into foul trouble no matter how many shots they block..........it's certainly not going to be easy but of all the teams that could challenge South Carolina, I'd say UConn has the best likelihood of beating them if they are on their game......SC with the # 1 D in the nation won't let Uconn see too many open 3's
Yep, I’m well aware of that.UConn has a kid name Paige who won every awards in her freshman year. If she is healthy this year, she will be a stud on the boards.
And she is improving her injury everyday now.
You’ve earned the bragging rights at this time.all those players played in the 1st meeting Sc, you know the one where SC held Uconn to 7 pt in the 4th?
SC doesn’t pack it in. They play a very tight man-to-man defense. If you have 3 pt. shooters they will come out. A good example is Arkansas. UConn does have better shooters and it would be a challenge. The fun thing about that matchup if it does occur is your strength is your guards, SC strength is it’s bigs.We have changed since the first meeting. Azzi, Caroline and Dorka have been acclaimated to UConn's offensive and defensive schemes. We have the size to compete with them and Yes we are definitly better 3 point shooters. SC like to pack it in have you beat them with outside shooting. We will do that and run the break on them. Our defense is better as well. UConn by 10 points.
Edwards has improved offensively, especially when being fed the ball in & around the key. However, her weak point is committing fouls & put on the bench shelve. I'm sure the foul acting classes are in full session for the tournaments !Personally I think one key to a match up between UConn and S.C. (Should it occur) Is Edwards vs Boston, 2 Strong, physical players. If Aaliyah, who has shown a consistent improvement the las 5-6 game, can hold her own against Boston, at least make things difficult for her, the rest of the team should be able to handle the rest.
Yes, but UConn was shooting them over Providence, Georgetown, et. South Carolina’s schedule. 2021-22 Women's Basketball Schedule - University of South Carolina Athleticsthe story, thus far.
fg%:
UConn 49%
angry birds 44%
3 ball %:
UConn 34%
angry birds 31%
and these include our long stretch of shooting on crutches, and from the hospital bed or couch. nobody can hit a shot from a lawnchair, not even us.
![]()
Boston averages 1.5 fouls per game, hasn't fouled out this year and just twice has had 4 fouls. That, along with UCONN not being a particularly bruising/physical team means Boston getting/not getting calls is probably a non issue.A key the officials need to stop protecting Boston.
Fouls called and fouls ignored different. Quick recent example SC Arkansas game 1 st quarter started with Boston going over Ramerize's back, who was attempting to block her out. No call. Few minutes after a Arkansas player driving Boston swiped down, did not keep her arms vertical, across her arms no call. The before the season even started promoted as NPOY is protected.Boston averages 1.5 fouls per game, hasn't fouled out this year and just twice has had 4 fouls. That, along with UCONN not being a particularly bruising/physical team means Boston getting/not getting calls is probably a non issue.
UConns help defense is why they are smothering opponents. Another point with their height up top and down low they have become a better rebounding and defensive team. UConn has held opponents to under 40 pts in their last 4 games and under 40pts in their last 5 of 6 games. Now I dont care who your playing thats great. How many other top ranked teams have come close to that. Another point. UConn is winning with a balanced offense which is now 9 deep and UConns execution on offense is a passing clinic and on defense is smothering. UConn has been up 50 pts in many of those wins. Do you think that SC is 40 pts better? Hey SC is very good but against this UConn team which is not the same team they faced early in the season I dont think SC wins. In fact it would take a complete collapse for UConn to loose any game the rest of the season. UConn has to many weapons and foul trouble with 9 deep is not the biggest concern.
i really like this show.Just here to read the comments....
![]()
Last 5-6 games against very weak teams with virtually no height.Personally I think one key to a match up between UConn and S.C. (Should it occur) Is Edwards vs Boston, 2 Strong, physical players. If Aaliyah, who has shown a consistent improvement the las 5-6 game, can hold her own against Boston, at least make things difficult for her, the rest of the team should be able to handle the rest.
It’s also about keeping constant pressure on the ball.the thing I don't understand is ppl keep mentioning the depth of the bench, there can only be 5 players on the court. So either 2 scenarios are going to happen.
They are going to put 4 guards and 1 big (not the best option imo) or they are going to put 3 guards and 2 bigs. So when people say Uconn has: Westbrook, Williams, Ducharme, Fudd, Bueckers. That means 2 of those players are going to be on the bench, it's not who has the most talented players, it's who can you put on the floor your best 5 against Sc's best 5 for numerous stretches.
Confidence makes a big difference. Playing weaker teams does help build confidence. DePaul, Marquette and Creighton in my opinion would be more mid-strength teams compared to Providence, St John's and Georgetown which are weaker. So, the competition wasn't all weak. DePaul and Morrow as an example........Last 5-6 games against very weak teams with virtually no height.
Not a compelling indicator.
3rd game in the Tourney is where the rubber starts to hit the road.
Then we’ll see.
I think we will, but let’s not get ahead of ourselves.