It is indeed Capital One, but what that has to do with the commercials isn't entirely clear.
Monday night was the first time I'd seen an Oregon State game from start to finish this year, and I'm not totally sure what to make of them. They shot the lights out from 3 in the first half, and their offense seemed to be humming. After halftime, Baylor really amped up its defensive intensity, both pressing fullcourt and pressuring the ball more in the halfcourt, which forced Oregon State into a bunch of turnovers and difficult shots. Oregon State shot 0-for-5 on 3-pointers in the second half and made only 2 field goals in the fourth quarter. Someone who's seen more of them can correct me, but to me they seem to be a smart, tough team that likes to run its offense at a certain pace, but one that can be forced into mistakes if you can speed them up.
Oregon State's defense is solid, but Baylor helped them out a bit by trying to make a bunch of difficult individual plays in the lane. Also, if (as UcM said above) the Beavers refused to play zone against Tennessee of all teams, does that mean they're going to play man-to-man against UConn for 40 minutes? UConn has seen so much zone this year that I think I can see their eyes light up when an opponent comes out in man-to-man.
My biggest concern about this game (aside from injuries, shots not falling, and all the other things that apply to any game) is probably rebounding, especially defensive rebounding. Oregon State looks to be very tough on the glass, and if UConn has another rebounding game like it had against Texas, it could spell trouble. As with the Texas game, I think UConn's opponent has more things to be worried about than UConn has, but Oregon State could still pose some problems if a few things break their way. As always, this late in the tournament, I'm not about to take anything for granted.